Channel
@dibai_01
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,028subscribers
-890 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002106131712 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dibai_01 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dibai_01 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @dibai_01/45486 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC | @baoguang_123/1005337 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @dibai_01/45490 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC | @baoguang_123/1005387 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @baoguang_123/1005187 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC | @dibai_01/45492 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dibai_01/45506 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC | @baoguang_123/1005237 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @baoguang_123/1005367 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC | @dibai_01/45510 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @baoguang_123 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dibai_01 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 104,028 | -203 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 104,231 | -127 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 104,358 | -182 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 104,540 | -259 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 104,799 | -108 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 104,907 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 104,918 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 413,570 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮 🇧🇮 西湖娱乐城 老品牌 大额出款无忧 单笔百万U秒出 全网担保上押1300万U 电子百家乐0审核0风控包出款 全球顶级博彩平台 盘总聚集地 🫤【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航 集团背书 信誉担保 全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 合营代理 独立后台 佣金周结 自主赚赔 层级保护，官方零接触用户 😍【封神战报 · 实力见证】 🇧🇮开挂人生：真人百家乐大神再创奇迹，狂揽680万U，引发圈内轰动热议 🇧🇮天降好运：神秘大哥2天创下300万u惊人战绩，单笔提现百万u秒到账 🇧🇮鸿运当头：幸运玩家一夜爆发，一举斩获88万U，出款秒到，大奖狂潮仍在继续！ 😬这行大家都懂，你能不能赢是一回事。你赢了能不能拿走，是另一回事。别拿真金白银去测人性，找个硬一点的盘子，心里起码踏实。 😆😆😆😆😆 @xhylcbot 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👍👍👍👍👍 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️2026美加墨世界杯 官方指定投注平台 全网最强福利 最高返利75% 👍👍👍👍👍【贵宾会】 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 官网 750.cc ⚡️⚡️⚡️👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👍扎根东南亚，面向全世界，打造东南亚华人的专属银行，携 Solaire 千亿实体资本入场，菲律宾索莱尔 · 官方直营，欢迎盘总挑战狗庄。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️👍👍👍👍👍 😘PG娱乐城大客户再创新高： 👍天之骄子：日本神秘大佬PG电子麻将胡了爆大奖出款176万U👈点击 👍重磅来袭：新加坡退休盘口老板百家乐1条天路喜提320万U👈点击 👍空前绝后：缅甸某园区股东9天赢走192万U 单笔提款百万u财务秒出款👈点击 👍👍👍…
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡TG全网最大信誉台 全网每月投流费用高达千万😃 #182体育 无处不在 ⚡⚡免实名 专属网址： 182195.com 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳 #182体育 存取款方便快捷 🔤🔤🔤😘以及C币 K豆 OKpay等20多种电子钱包 微信 支付宝 存取款。 气运之子：PP电子极速糖果1000爆庄763万 😍 真人视讯：PA真人过五关斩六将 盈利 555万 😀 麻将大水：麻将胡了满配发财五条拉爆狗庄 832万 赏金女王：女王降临好运挡都挡不住拉爆狗庄 638万 😘【182体育｜新人专享福利】 首存1万 赠送彩金1888 首存3万 赠送彩金2888 首存5万 赠送彩金4888 首存8万 赠送彩金6888 首存10万 赠送彩金8888 首存20万 赠送彩金18888 每日存款彩金每日送，每笔存款加赠 1️⃣🔤 182体育 #无风控 #电子真人零审核…
🎉1
【N1国际】U投首选平台|实力认证 |值得信赖！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 😀注册网址： N10255.com 全网广告频道上押1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣万😘 TG最大信誉平台 玩家首选综合🔤台 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 😀每日返水😀😀😀返水无上限 大额无忧！ 气运之子：PP极速糖果 30U爆25000倍大奖75万U 😀 糖果大水：PP极速糖果 单注500爆得500万U巨奖😀 PG大水：玩家在麻将胡了2 拉出满屏八万 爆230万U 😀 麻将大水：PG电子麻将胡了2 玩家进关爆510万U 😀 #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移 首复存均送每日存每日送 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 USDT存出款 电子超高爆率！#电子真人0审核包出款 😳😁😉😚 无风控 免实名 无需手机号 ⚡⚡⚡👍👍👍👍👍 😀Solaire千亿实体资本，菲律宾索莱尔 · 官方直营😘#真人视讯单注限红20万u一口 欢迎各位大佬来爆庄 😀 申请客服：@N1…
🇺🇸美国FBI局长披露“黑夜行动”成果 在特朗普总统的领导下，联邦调查局正在主动出击，直捣窃取美国人毕生积蓄的全球诈骗网络。代号为“黑夜行动”（Operation Blackout）的行动取得了以下历史性成果： → 查扣了价值152亿美元的非法资产 → 捣毁了数十个诈骗中心 → 逮捕了数百名犯罪分子 → 解救了数千名人口贩运受害者 → 关闭了7500多个互联网终端 → 向近9000名潜在受害者发出了预警 → 避免了约5.62亿美元的潜在损失 这些诈骗中心并非简单的呼叫中心，而是跨国犯罪企业，从事人口贩运，洗钱数十亿美元，并且从海外针对美国人实施犯罪活动。 ——联邦调查局局长卡什· 帕特尔 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀N1国际 免实名无风控 反水无上限 大额无忧！ 😍😍😍😍⚡⚡电子大水柬埔寨大哥 麻将胡了两万一拉爆1600万 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 电子百家乐0审核0风控 包出款 全球顶级华人博…
朱镕基同志逝世 中国共产党中央委员会、中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会、中华人民共和国国务院、中国人民政治协商会议全国委员会沉痛宣告：中国共产党的优秀党员，久经考验的忠诚的共产主义战士，杰出的无产阶级革命家、政治家，党和国家的卓越领导人，中国共产党第十四届、十五届中央政治局常委，国务院原总理朱镕基同志，因病医治无效，于2026年8月12日11时06分在北京逝世，享年98岁。 朱镕基同志，1928年10月生，湖南长沙人。&& 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀N1国际 免实名无风控 反水无上限 大额无忧！ 😍😍😍😍⚡⚡电子大水柬埔寨大哥 麻将胡了两万一拉爆1600万 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 电子百家乐0审核0风控 包出款 全球顶级华人博彩平台 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩综合U台 赌神降临11天赢走1.6亿秒出款 零审核包出款 福利频道 @Y3SVIP75 官方网站： y3381.com 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠…
#国内资讯：广东梅州公安侦破特大虚假助贷诈骗案，抓获106人，涉案金额380余万元！ 广东省公安厅8月4日通报：近期，梅州市公安机关深入研判、波次收网，成功打掉一个传统诈骗与电信网络诈骗相结合，利用“线上+线下”模式，在全国实施虚假助贷的新型诈骗犯罪团伙，彻底捣毁“信息端—引流端—线下端—话务端”完整犯罪链条，抓获犯罪嫌疑人106人，涉案金额达380余万元。 经查，涉案团伙假借银行名义，向全国不特定群众群发虚假贷款诱导信息，完成前端引流，同时安排专人对受害人尤其是重疾人员、老年人、失业人员等易受骗群体进行话术引导，随后推送至本地线下“助贷公司”。线下助贷公司利用合法注册公司、正规写字楼办公的方式包装经营资质，伪装合法正规经营身份对接上门客户，通过虚构贷款实力、谎称拥有内部审批渠道、专属放款额度、低利率贷款资质等名义，对不懂网络贷款的群众虚构“风险管理金”骗取网贷金额25%的费用，实则仅代办群众可自主申请办理的普通信贷业务。 …
#缅甸资讯：克伦邦再曝69英亩新诈骗园区 关联克伦民族军首领之子 缅甸媒体8月10日发布调查，在克伦邦帕因觉镇一带发现一处新建诈骗园区，位置在梅拉瓦迪新村约1英里外，占地超过69英亩。 调查人员将现场视频和卫星影像进行比对，园区位置、建筑布局等特征基本吻合 卫星记录显示，这片区域从2025年12月开始大规模施工，与今年1月曝光的玉龙湾园区并非同一处。 调查显示，这处园区与克伦民族军首领索奇督的儿子索奇奇有关。索奇奇现任克伦民族军第999战术指挥部副指挥官。 一名前工作人员提供的信息显示，园区使用星链卫星网络和发电机维持运作，内部开展针对美国人的网络诈骗业务，工作人员外出受到限制。 今年1月曝光的玉龙湾园区位于妙瓦底一带，早在2020年就开始建设，当时关联的是索奇督另一名儿子索图埃穆。此次新园区的地点、建设时间和关联人物均不相同。 美国财政部此前已对克伦民族军、索奇督以及他的两个儿子索图埃穆和索奇奇实施制裁。相关制裁…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩品牌铸就非凡 · 实力绝非偶然 ➡️ 超级玩家赌神附体，狂揽1.6亿，可自行验证真伪 😀注册网址： y3381.com ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 #东南亚盘总们首选最权威综合😃台 集团储备资金2亿U 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台。 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 📣Y3国际 #真人视讯限红50万u一口 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀#电子可3000U一拉 😀Solaire千亿实体资本，菲律宾索莱尔·官方直营 😘Y3精彩时刻： 女王大水 玩家在PG电子赏金女王盈利450万U PP电子糖果大水玩家在PP电子极速糖果盈利380万 麻将胡了爆大分 玩家在PG电子麻将胡了盈利420万 【#Y3国际｜全网福利天花板】 单笔出款50万 彩金3888 单笔出款100万 彩金8888 单笔出款300万 彩金38…
#最新消息：今天中午金三角特外杀疯了，老挝警察到处查，到处追，没护照的兄弟赶紧撤！！！ PS：看监控都开枪了，安全最重要，开工无所谓 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀N1国际 免实名无风控 反水无上限 大额无忧！ 😍😍😍😍⚡⚡电子大水柬埔寨大哥 麻将胡了两万一拉爆1600万 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 电子百家乐0审核0风控 包出款 全球顶级华人博彩平台 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩综合U台 赌神降临11天赢走1.6亿秒出款 零审核包出款 福利频道 @Y3SVIP75 官方网站： y3381.com 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 PG集团耗资百亿美金打造全网最顶级线上娱乐城，业界龙头，行业第一，PG直营 仅此一站 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 全网广告费每月投入500万u 东南亚上押500万u 全网上押 5000万U 煮酒论英雄 广告论实力 资金储备5亿U 世界杯大哥首选 🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮🇧🇮😆😝😝😝😜老品牌 出款无忧 电子百…
#雅典娜案反转 警方澄清，并没有任何警方公布雅典娜已遇害 “近日，有关百万粉丝网红“雅典娜Liya”（本名孔丽梅）确认遇害的消息在网络流传，引发广泛关注。 2026年8月11日，宁波公安对此传闻作出官方回应，澄清了案件归属及关键信息的来源，强调并未证实该网红已遇害。 频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😀😀😀N1国际 免实名无风控 反水无上限 大额无忧！ 😍😍😍😍⚡⚡电子大水柬埔寨大哥 麻将胡了两万一拉爆1600万 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 电子百家乐0审核0风控 包出款 全球顶级华人博彩平台 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩综合U台 赌神降临11天赢走1.6亿秒出款 零审核包出款 福利频道 @Y3SVIP75 官方网站： y3381.com 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 PG集团耗资百亿美金打造全网最顶级线上娱乐城，业界龙头，行业第一，PG直营 仅此一站 🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥 全网广告费每月投入500万u 东南亚上押500万u 全…
【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉平台 玩家首选 🇺🇸🇻🇳🇷🇪🇻🇪🇺🇸🇻🇳⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 全网每月投流费用高达千万😃 #2028体育 无处不在 ⚡⚡免实名 专属网址: 2028vip169.com #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移，平台支持USDT 👌 微信 👌 支付宝 K豆等100多种钱包！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 首存送 复存送 投注送 豪车嫩模！ 电子黄金周 周一至周日福利拿不停！ 单笔出款奖励最高⚡😍😍😍😍😍 以小博大 PP电子 极速糖果1000 爆出12103倍💥 百家乐战神 真人收割机 大佬一天收割2000万💥 气运之子 PP电子 麻将大胜 100元爆25000倍250万💥 PG战神 独创奇迹大佬麻将胡了1 两万一拉爆了3400万💥 ⚡️2028体育欢迎各大老板盘总娱乐 #东南亚超高爆率电子人民币台 PG电子单注可拉2万一转 百家乐单注限红可打20万一口 （大额提…
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @dibai_01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 863,486 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜新闻|海豹资讯曝光|dubai news” (@dibai_01), 104,028 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dibai_01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.