Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی “اسکینی”

Channel

سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی “اسکینی”

@eskini_vi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,791subscribers

+2,797 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316622651
TypeChannel
Username@eskini_vi
Description️ سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی 📊 نگاهی تحلیلی به بازار، با رویکرد ارزش‌محور 👤 سبحان اسکینی دکتری مدیریت مالی و فعال بازار سرمایه 👤 علی اسکینی مدیر سرمایه‌گذاری تأمین سرمایه نوین 📲 در بله نیز با همین آدرس همراه ما باشید سبدگردانی پیغام دهید: @Eskini_vI_PRX
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eskini_vi

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@eskini_vi/1294 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC@bourse24ir/4451861 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bourse24ir6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutesthis entry (5–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 73 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

5,9948,7917,392.55 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,002 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,174 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,226 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,335 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,389 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,473 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,519 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,137 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,307 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,362 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,384 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,396 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,411 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,544 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,746 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,794 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,828 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,924 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,058 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,082 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,173 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,239 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,301 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,431 subscribers12 November 2026 — 8,791 subscribers5 August 202612 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 98 days, net +2,797. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,574–9,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 03:108,791+360
8 Nov 2026, 02:098,431+130
4 Nov 2026, 21:068,301+62
2 Nov 2026, 06:448,239+66
30 Oct 2026, 05:368,173+91
27 Oct 2026, 08:078,082+24
24 Oct 2026, 03:478,058+134
20 Oct 2026, 23:467,924+96
17 Oct 2026, 12:507,828+34
14 Oct 2026, 12:467,794+48
11 Oct 2026, 06:197,746+202
4 Oct 2026, 23:387,544+133
25 Sept 2026, 09:597,411+15
17 Sept 2026, 05:197,396+12
13 Sept 2026, 10:157,384+22
9 Sept 2026, 21:387,362+55
4 Sept 2026, 19:007,307+170
31 Aug 2026, 22:277,137+618
28 Aug 2026, 14:066,519+46
25 Aug 2026, 04:556,473first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.6%
avg views ÷ 8,791 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,800
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held77 (29 July 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total206,393
Reactions total3,368
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 13:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,220
Videos
≈140
Links
≈115

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 54m
Average length
37m 42s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,347 reactions across 75 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,347100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (14.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 12:37 UTC753 views21 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

#طلا #ارز | وضعیت بازارهای موازی با اونس ۳٬۸۷۹ دلاری و دلار آزاد ۲۶۷٬۶۰۵ تومانی، دلار ضمنی صندوق‌های طلا حدود ۲۶۰٬۷۰۰ تومان است؛ حدود ۲٫۶٪ پایین‌تر از بازار آزاد. شمش نیز با دلار ۲۵۹٬۱۰۰ تومانی و سکه با دلار ۲۷۰٬۵۰۰ تومانی معامله می‌شود. ☑️سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی ㅤ @eskini_vi

👍21

Signed Ali Eskini

14 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,510 views130 reactionsread 15 November 2026
File

▶️ نسخه کامل لایو | آخرین وضعیت بازار در لایو امروز با بچه های بورس ۲۴ ابتدا شرایط فعلی بازار و متغیرهای اثرگذار بر روند معاملات را بررسی کردیم؛ سپس سناریوهای مختلف پیش‌رو، از تشدید تنش و جنگ تا توافق و حالت‌های بینابینی را مرور کردیم و اثر هر سناریو بر بازار را سنجیدیم. در ادامه، وضعیت و حساسیت صنایع مختلف در هر یک از این سناریوها بررسی شد و در پایان نیز به نمادهای برتر و گزینه‌های جذاب‌تر بازار پرداختیم. ☑️سرمایه…

👍130

Signed Ali Eskini

14 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC≈2,450 views71 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @bourse24irPhoto

گفت و گوی زنده بورس۲۴ با علی اسکینی مدیر سرمایه گذاری تامین سرمایه نوین با موضوع: آخرین وضعیت بازار بورس امروز ساعت۱۶ @bourse24ir

👍71

Signed Ali Eskini

14 Nov 2026, 04:36 UTC≈2,910 views66 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔋افت رقابت در PVC موقت یا دائمی؟! 👈از ابتدای سال ۱۴۰۵ و بعد از آسیب دیدن نیروگاه فجر (تامین کننده یوتیلیتی و برق پتروشیمی اروند) در منطقه ماهشهر، یکی از محصولاتی که روند صعودی گرفت، PVC بود و با درصد رقابت بالای ۱۰۰٪ در بورس کالا رقابت شد. 👈در دو مقطع رقابت PVC با افت همراه شد، یکی تفاهم نامه اسلام‌آباد و افت شدید نرخ ارز و دوم، بازگشت اروند به مدار تولید PVC. اما بعد از مدتی، این اثر از بین رفت! 👈در آخرین معاملات…

👍66

Signed sobhan eskini

12 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,870 views135 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🎥 #سرود | بررسی بنیادی سیمان شاهرود در این ویدئو سعی کرده‌ایم سیمان شاهرود را به‌صورت جامع از منظر بنیادی بررسی کنیم؛ از وضعیت تولید و فروش و روند نرخ‌ها گرفته تا حاشیه سود، سودآوری، ریسک‌ها و پارامترهای ارزش‌گذاری سهم. سرود از شرکت‌های صادرات‌محور صنعت سیمان است و با توجه به رشد مقدار فروش و تسعیر درآمدهای صادراتی با نرخی نزدیک به دلار آزاد، می‌تواند سودآوری مناسبی داشته باشد؛ حتی با در نظر گرفتن مفروضات نسبتاً حد…

👍135

Signed Ali Eskini

12 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC≈3,780 views80 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

✅ #سرود #کارشناسی_سود 🎥در ویدئوی پست بعدی، به‌روزرسانی سودآوری سیمان شاهرود ارائه شده است. ☑️سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی ㅤ @eskini_vi

👍80

Signed Ali Eskini

10 Nov 2026, 17:50 UTC≈4,970 views89 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

◀️ #سپاها؛ رشد ۵۵ درصدی سود سالانه، با بودجه ۳ همتی برای سال جدید ㅤ سیمان سپاهان سال مالی را شهریور می‌بندد و در سال ۱۴۰۵ حدود ۱.۹ همت سود خالص ساخته که ۵۵٪ بیشتر از سال قبل است. فروش سالانه هم با ۴۳٪ رشد به حدود ۵.۲ همت رسیده که کل آن از نرخ آمده است. مقدار فروش ۹٪ کمتر شده، ولی متوسط نرخ فروش ۵۸٪ بالا رفته است. تابستان، مثل خیلی از سیمانی‌ها، فصل افت حاشیه سود بود. حاشیه سود ناخالص از حدود ۵۰٪ در بهار به ۲۸٪ رسید، …

👍89

Signed Ali Eskini

9 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈4,810 views77 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🔵 هفدهمین تحلیل بنیادی ۱۸۰ ثانیه‌ای 🤔 تحلیلی محافظه‌کارانه از نماد #لطیف 🖌 تحلیلگر: ا.رحیمی ✅سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی @eskini_vi

👍77

Signed sobhan eskini

9 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC≈9,340 views104 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔵 تحلیل ۹ نماد ارائه‌شده در وبینار بررسی گزارش‌های ماهانه مهر 🔵 ㅤ ✅ در وبینار روز گذشته انیگما، ۹ نماد از منظر بنیادی و با اتکا به گزارش‌های اخیر بررسی شدند. بخشی از این نمادها توسط کانال سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی و بخش دیگر توسط آقای پویان مظفری مطرح شد. 📌 برای دنبال‌کردن تحلیل‌ها و مطالب پویان مظفری | اقتصاد-سرمایه‌گذاری می‌توانید از طریق کانال زیر همراه ایشان باشید: @pouyaninvestment ㅤ ☑️سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی ㅤ @eskini_vi

👍104

Signed Ali Eskini

8 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC≈9,330 views141 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🎥 #وبینار #ماهانه نسخه نهایی وبینار بررسی گزارش‌های فروش مهر صنایع بورسی. در این وبینار، گزارش‌های فروش صنایع مختلف مرور و شرکت‌های مستعدتر هر گروه بررسی شده‌اند. ☑️سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی ㅤ @eskini_vi

👍141

Signed Ali Eskini

8 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,810 views46 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @enigma_investingPhoto

🔴 لینک ورود وبینار ( لطفا به صورت مهمان وارد شوید) https://skyroom.online/ch/enigma_investing/mehr1405

👍46

Signed Ali Eskini

7 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC≈5,600 views126 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

💊#دسبحان #کارشناسی_سود انبار پر، حاشیه بالا و چشم‌انداز مناسب سودآوری ㅤ سبحان دارو در ۹ ماهه منتهی به شهریور ۱۴۰۵ با فروش ۶٫۳ همت و حاشیه ناخالص ۶۸٪ حدود ۲٫۹ همت سود خالص ساخته است. این رقم ۵٫۵ برابر سود کل سال ۱۴۰۴ (۵۳۰ میلیارد تومان) و ۷۴٪ بودجه سالانه ۴ همتی است. برای کل سال مالی منتهی به آذر، با فرض افت حاشیه ناخالص به ۶۳٪، سود ۴٫۷ همت (۴۶۵ تومان به ازای هر سهم) برآورد می‌شود. شرکت حدود ۴ ماه مواد اولیه در انبا…

👍126

Signed Ali Eskini

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @eskini_vi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@eskini_vi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

گروه نوویرا | Novira Group
@noviraco · 28,909
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
شرکت سبدگردان زاگرس
@zagrosassetmanagement · 15,091
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
استخدام در نهادهای مالی - کانون کارگزاران
@SEBAemployment · 26,831
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 25,039
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
کانال کدال 724
@C0dal724 · 23,305
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی “اسکینی”” (@eskini_vi), 8,791 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eskini_vi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.