Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Еловский. Выборы - это просто.

Channel

Еловский. Выборы - это просто.

@Yvybor

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,111subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002628069470
TypeChannel
Username@Yvybor
DescriptionАвторский канал политконсультанта, ответственного секретаря рабочей группы по социальной архитектуре РАСО Дмитрия Еловского. 🔹ТОП-20 политических каналов по версии РАСО. Для обратной связи: @Yvybor_bot Мой сайт: https://yelovsky.ru/ N°773128205
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Yvybor

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 17 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@yellow_sky_policy21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (15–6)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 79 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 17 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @politburo2. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 17 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,06010,11810,0896 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,066 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,066 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,068 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,066 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,065 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,061 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,060 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,062 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,064 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,066 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,068 subscribers3 October 2026 — 10,062 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,061 subscribers12 October 2026 — 10,062 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,061 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,060 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,061 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,099 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,108 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,111 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,110 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,112 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,115 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,116 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,118 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,116 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,115 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,116 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,115 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,114 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,115 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,114 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,113 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,112 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,111 subscribers10,1116 August 20269 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 95 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,051–10,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 18:3110,111-1
8 Nov 2026, 09:5910,112-1
7 Nov 2026, 07:1910,113-1
5 Nov 2026, 06:1110,114-1
4 Nov 2026, 08:3110,115+1
3 Nov 2026, 09:4610,114-1
2 Nov 2026, 07:0910,115-1
1 Nov 2026, 06:4610,116+1
31 Oct 2026, 08:3010,115-1
30 Oct 2026, 12:0010,116-2
29 Oct 2026, 14:5510,118+2
28 Oct 2026, 11:5610,116+1
27 Oct 2026, 11:4610,115+3
26 Oct 2026, 13:2710,112+2
25 Oct 2026, 16:3610,110-1
24 Oct 2026, 17:1010,111+3
23 Oct 2026, 17:5910,108+9
22 Oct 2026, 15:5610,099+38
21 Oct 2026, 11:4910,061+1
16 Oct 2026, 11:2710,060first reading

Engagement

99 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.24%
avg views ÷ 10,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.196%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 99 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held99 (22 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total13,779
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
41
Videos
3
Links
366

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1h 17m
Average length
1h 17m

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2332.4%
👍2028.2%
🔥1115.5%
👏68.45%
😁57.04%
🙏57.04%
🤔11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (2.38%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Павел Дорофеев и Иван Мотоусов о кампании ЛДПР на выборах в Заксобрание Кировской области: Стартовые условия: • В декабре 2025 года поддержка партии в регионе — 7%. • Жёсткие ресурсные ограничения, нет бюджета на проверку гипотез и стартового медийного преимущества. • Сильная партия власти с админресурсом и парламентские партии с устоявшимся электоратом. • Новый координатор отделения появился только в октябре 2025 г…

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Кампания Анны Альминовой в 23-м округе на выборах в Заксобрание Кировской области от «Новых людей»: Альминова — олимпийская спортсменка и чемпионка Европы. В Кирове её фамилия почти синоним спорта, и спортивная биография заслоняла остальное: она руководила региональным министерством спорта и молодёжной политики, была депутатом городской думы. Задача — показать за известной фамилией сильного политика. Стартовые усло…

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Александр Балабанов о своей кампании на выборах в Заксобрание Кировской области от «Новых людей»: «Всё против Балабанова». Ещё до старта кандидату дали понять, что в Заксобрании видят его оппонента, действующего депутата от «Единой России» Ильгиза Бурханова. У того три созыва в Заксобрании, поддержка социальной сферы и административный ресурс. Стартовые условия: • Округ из двух частей. В Вятскополянском районе Бала…

🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 12:08 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Пётр Быстров о кампании «Единой России» в Оренбургской области на выборах в Госдуму и Заксобрание: Стартовые условия: • Поддержка губернатора Евгения Солнцева — 55%. Для Оренбуржья это высокий рейтинг, у его предшественника он был существенно ниже. • Сильные позиции КПРФ после 2021 года: большая фракция в Заксобрании и несколько одномандатных округов. • В отличие от 2021 года, элиты консолидировались вокруг губернат…

🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC65 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания Алексея Золотарёва в 111-м одномандатном округе в Госдуму (Курская область): Стартовые условия: • В округ вошли все отселённые и обстреливаемые приграничные территории, где сосредоточен основной протестный потенциал. • Риск срыва голосования из-за обстрелов и делегитимизации выборов. • Информационные атаки ЦИПсО: в отдельные дни до четырёх фейков в сутки. • Три разные аудитории: приграничье (около 20% избир…

11 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC65 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания «Единой России» на выборах в Курскую областную думу: Стартовые условия: • Выборы под ударами: около 91 тыс. из 850 тыс. жителей отселены из обстреливаемых районов. Индекс социального самочувствия низкий. • Риск снижения явки, вопрос безопасности избирателей и доверия к выборам. Решения: • Список возглавил губернатор Александр Хинштейн, кампанию синхронизировали с губернаторскими выборами 2025 года. Тройка …

11 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC66 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания Сергея Никитина (ЕР) на выборах в Заксобрание Красноярского края: Главная особенность кампании: популярность кандидата работала против него. Никитин — политический тяжеловес, 21 год в Ачинском городском и окружном советах. Жители так привыкли к нему, что готовы были голосовать против, лишь бы не «отпускать» его в Красноярск. Стартовые условия: • В округе одновременно шли выборы в Госдуму, Заксобрание и доп…

11 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC78 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания Партии пенсионеров на выборах в Заксобрание Карелии: Стартовые условия: • Рейтинг партии в июне около 1,5%, слабое присутствие в регионе, сложности с финансированием. • Одна из самых конкурентных кампаний в стране: 11 кандидатов в одномандатном округе в Госдуму, 9 партий на выборах в Заксобрание и Горсовет. • Высокая протестная активность и пересечение аудитории со «Справедливой Россией», чей кандидат борол…

11 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC81 viewsread 11 November 2026

Сергей Усатенко о кампании «Новых людей» на выборах в Заксобрание Карелии: При скромном бюджете цель была набрать 24 тыс. голосов при ожидаемой явке около 38%. Задачи: • Показать, что «Новые люди» в Карелии — это не «партия имени Сергея Усатенко», а команда разных лиц. • Перетянуть электорат «Яблока», которое в 2021 году набрало более 9% и два мандата в Заксобрание. • Вывести кампанию за пределы Петрозаводска, на в…

11 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC86 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания Григория Бачерикова (ЕР) на выборах в Заксобрание Свердловской области: Риски на старте: • Узнаваемость 10%, рейтинг 5%. • Переход кандидата из КПРФ в «Единую Россию». • Репутационный риск: приватизация Ирбитского молочного завода, директором которого он является. • Неблагоприятный экономический фон и паводок, от которого пострадали более тысячи домовладений. • До этого кандидат никогда не участвовал в прям…

11 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC86 viewsread 11 November 2026

Ирина Виноградова о кампании «Новых людей» в Свердловской области на выборах в Госдуму: Одновременно прошли выборы в Госдуму, Заксобрание и муниципалитеты, поэтому кампанию вели единым штабом на всех трёх уровнях. Все пять парламентских партий в регионе традиционно сильны. План — 10% в Госдуму и 12% в Заксобрание. Позиционирование: не «супертехнологичная молодая партия», а партия для тех, кто живёт здесь и сейчас. …

11 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC76 viewsread 11 November 2026

Кампания «Единой России» в Севастополе на выборах в Госдуму: Стартовые условия: партия шла лидером, поэтому главный вызов — сохранить и оправдать доверие. Но людям было не до выборов: тревожность, перебои со светом и бензином, атаки беспилотников. Только 20% жителей могли назвать дату выборов. Идея: сначала поддержать и защитить, а уже потом говорить о выборах. Людям нужна была опора, и ей стала городская система в…

Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @Yvybor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Politteh - Комитет по политтехнологиям РАСО
@Politteh · 6,580
6 posts
Клуб Регионов
@clubrf · 42,197
2 posts
Евгений Минченко. Персонально по делу
@enminchenko · 23,454
2 posts
Образ лидера. Семинары "Минченко консалтинг"
@MinchenkoConsulting · 3,162
2 posts
Российская ассоциация по связям с общественностью (РАСО)
@rasopr · 4,103
2 posts
Щеголихин Пишет Хорошо
@sssccchhhe · 1,490
2 posts
Александра Бокова
@AbokovA23 · 632
1 post
Канал Алексея Комиссарова
@akomissarov2022 · 26,171
1 post
ПУЛЕМЁТ ДЕГТЯРЁВА 🇷🇺
@Degtyarev_Info · 18,678
1 post
ЭИСИ - Регионы
@eisr_region · 1,234
1 post
Эксперт по Госдуме/Склянчук Павел
@expertgd · 14,011
1 post
Премия Гамбургский счет
@GamburgPrize · 85
1 post
ИНСОМАР
@insomar · 1,297
1 post
Татьяна Косачева
@kosacheva62 · 1,811
1 post
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,832
1 post
МГИМО. Официально
@mgimo_university · 30,281
1 post
НЕЧАЕВ
@nechaev_official · 37,003
1 post
Обухов.PRO
@obuhovpro · 5,580
1 post
Политесса Кислицына
@politessakislitsyna · 8,509
1 post
ТолмачёV наZтоящий
@realtolmachev · 1,291
1 post
Старовойтов о политике
@sstarovoytov · 3,600
1 post
Геннадий Зюганов
@zyuganov · 8,957
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Еловский. Выборы - это просто.” (@Yvybor), 10,111 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yvybor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.