Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ESG World

Channel

ESG World

@esgworld

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,690subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240131512
TypeChannel
Username@esgworld
DescriptionНовости, доклады, аналитика по теме ESG, изменения климата, энергоперехода. Сообщество интересующихся повесткой устойчивого развития. Идеи, вопросы, предложения - @konzarr
Created14 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/esgworld

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6897,7667,727.56 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,765 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,766 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,757 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,755 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,758 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,759 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,763 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,756 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,757 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,752 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,746 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,737 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,730 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,720 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,715 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,709 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,710 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,701 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,695 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,689 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,690 subscribers7,6906 August 202610 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,677–7,778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 10:187,690+1
6 Nov 2026, 17:157,689-6
3 Nov 2026, 14:167,695-6
31 Oct 2026, 12:517,701-9
28 Oct 2026, 07:377,710+1
24 Oct 2026, 23:267,709-6
22 Oct 2026, 08:277,715-5
19 Oct 2026, 01:197,720-10
15 Oct 2026, 17:167,730-7
12 Oct 2026, 13:507,737-9
6 Oct 2026, 04:427,746-6
28 Sept 2026, 23:387,752-5
19 Sept 2026, 12:207,757+1
14 Sept 2026, 19:167,756-7
11 Sept 2026, 00:367,763+4
6 Sept 2026, 01:577,759+1
2 Sept 2026, 07:587,758+3
29 Aug 2026, 23:137,755-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:247,757-5
23 Aug 2026, 14:127,762first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.96%
avg views ÷ 7,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
612
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held61 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total18,968
Reactions total247
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,550
Videos
≈50
Links
≈3,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

558 reactions across 58 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24043.0%
👍16028.7%
🔥7513.4%
✍213.76%
😢132.33%
💯122.15%
🤔122.15%
👎111.97%
👏61.08%
⚡40.717%
🤯40.717%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 558 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (6.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC184 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

#Дайджест интересного с COP31. Часть 1 Вы же не думали, что мы оставим вас без сводок с форума? 📰 COP31 открылся в Анталье — и на этот раз обошлось без многодневного спора вокруг повестки: её приняли в первый день, а африканские пункты по адаптационным финансам и торговле в неё не вошли. Саймон Стил с порога задал тон: скачок цен на ископаемое топливо "распространяет инфляцию как рак", а Крис Боуэн пообещал, что ит…

❤3🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC296 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @energytransition4Photo

Энергетические атташе РФ Сегодня принял участие в программе профессиональной подготовки энергетических атташе в МГИМО с лекцией по глобальному энергопереходу. По плану слушатели этой программы после завершения подготовки разъедутся по посольствам РФ в других странах, где будут представлять интересы российского энергетического экспорта. Основная мысль моей лекции — климатический кризис реален, температура в приземно…

👍6❤3🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 07:21 UTC506 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Российская заявка в CORSIA: что дальше Совета ICAO одобрил рекомендацию Технического консультативного органа (TAB) CORSIA — российскую заявку придётся отправлять повторно (реаккредитация) после доработки механизмов отечественного углеродного рынка. Что это значит для рынка, рассуждает Андрей Птичников, к.г.н., главный эксперт Центра цифровых технологий для природно-климатических проектов НИУ ВШЭ @natureclimate: В…

❤5👍4🔥4

9 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC573 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Три вопроса COP31 В Анталье открылся COP31 — главный климатический форум года, интересный хотя бы своей конфигурацией. COP принимает Турция, а переговоры ведёт Австралия — так разделились роли после того, как обе страны претендовали на проведение. Фоном идут войны, ИИ сосёт энергию как не в себя, а США официально отсутствуют второй год кряду, хотя де-факто от Штатов приехала солидная делегация. Саммит приходится …

❤6👍4🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC466 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Форум "Социальные инвестиции-2026" в Noôdome Великое заземление, возвращение к основам, социализация повестки — можно называть происходящее как угодно, но факт есть факт: роль S-блока в устойчивом развитии сейчас велика как никогда. Анализу одного из самых важных — и многомерных — сегментов блока, социальным инвестициям в широком смысле, будет посвящён экспертный форум, который в эту среду проведут ЦСП "Платформа" …

🤯4❤2🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC513 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как рассказывать об экологических свойствах своей продукции? Если слукавишь — кто ответит и сколько это будет стоить? И как выстроить процесс, чтобы все заявления проверялись загодя, а не задним числом после претензии ФАС? Ответы на эти вопросы будем искать в ближайший четверг на совместном вебинаре Экологического союза, Comply, Бюро экологического комплаенса FUTUR — и @esgworld. Спикеры и программа 🔹 Юлия Граче…

❤4👍3

6 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC585 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Крупнейшую за 24 года альпинистскую трагедию в России увязали с климатическими изменениями — официально #Риски 👍 ESG World

😢5👎2🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC639 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📰 Российские углеродные единицы пока не допустят до CORSIA — но шанс остаётся. Технический консультативный орган ИКАО рекомендовал доработать заявку и подать её повторно. Что именно надо исправить, впрочем, не раскрывается. Российская программа — 1 из 10, которым рекомендовано переподаться после доработки. Совет ИКАО с рекомендациями TAB согласился, повторная подача ожидается в начале 2027 года. Драматизировать не ст…

⚡4❤3

6 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC461 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Полный текст рисёрча к посту выше ☝️ #Доклады #Стандарты 👍 ESG World

👍5👏2

6 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC578 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Какие движения в нефинансовой отчётности в России? Топ интересных фактов из исследования @ACRAru и @committeer, проведённого при скромной поддержке @esgworld #Доклады #Стандарты 👍 ESG World

❤5👍4

5 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC563 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Уважаемые коллеги! Вторая редакция нашего доклада (по главам) будет размещена на сайте ЦЭНЭФ-XXI 2-3 ноября по ссылке: https://cenef-xxi.ru/articles/ocenochnyj-doklad-rossiya-v-usloviyah-zelenoj-tehnologicheskoj-revolyucii.-stagnaciya-ili-smena-drajverov-rosta . Прошу вас максимально широко разослать эту ссылку всем заинтересованным экспертам с приглашением присылать свои комментарии и замечания на адрес: [email protected]…

❤5

5 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC574 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Лонживити и устойчивое развитие Устойчивое развитие — концепция, обращённая в будущее, и в этом отчасти её проблема: когда горизонт планирования сжимается, многим становится как бы не до того. Но есть будущее, которое сложно отложить до лучших времен, — собственное: наше здоровье или нездоровье, долголетие или нет, счастливая жизнь или не очень. В этом ракурсе @esgworld предлагает посмотреть и на ESG, тем более пр…

💯4❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @esgworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@esgworld edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

"Расширенная ответственность потребителя" — здравая идея или перекладывание ответственности?

  1. Идея здравая: ответственность надо делить19%
  2. Проблема реальна, но решать её надо через стимулы30%
  3. Это перекладывание обязательств с бизнеса на потребителя51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Возможности в устойчивом развитии
@check_opportunities · 22,704
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
«Зелёный» змий
@greenserpent · 23,536
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
Ресайкл
@recyclemagru · 58,109
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Экология | Энергетика | ESG
@ecologia_i_energetika · 57,652
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
ШЭР / Шеринг. Экология. Рациональность
@etosher · 116,747
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
Эколог Соколова ®
@sokolovaeco · 29,596
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Экология без фанатизма
@ecodays · 38,378
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Экологиня
@ecomisli · 45,258
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Сортировочная
@sortirovochnaya · 24,010
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Эколог Жора Каваносян
@ecozhora · 32,069
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
СИБУР
@siburofficial · 28,516
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Energy Today
@energytodaygroup · 24,285
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ESG World” (@esgworld), 7,690 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esgworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.