Channel
@polina_svet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,005subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001748751170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polina_svet |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polina_svet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 1,005 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 1,006 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1,005 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
338 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 34.3% | |
| 🔥 | 92 | 27.2% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 10.7% | |
| 🤣 | 31 | 9.17% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 5.62% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 4.44% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 4.14% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 2.66% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.296% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.296% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polina_svet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 February 2026 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
После небольшой паузы врываюсь в эфир по двум прекрасным энергетическим поводам! - Отмечаем День рождения самой крутой команды Транснефтьэнерго - Записали энергетический подкаст в Глобальной энергии на самую (на мой взгляд) захватывающую тему энергетических технологий будущего
❤20🔥10👍5
Signed Polina S
В День радио обычно с теплом вспоминаю свою работу на радиостанциях. Это невероятная магия, которая всегда будет со мной. Сначала на областном музыкальном радио включала песни по заявкам. Ночные смены были самыми романтичными. Потом в Москве стала корреспондентом, ходила на крупные мероприятия, вела репортажи в прямом эфире, работала в студии. Люди радио знают важный секрет: Одна минута — это целая вечность! За э…
❤24🔥14👏8💯3👍1
Signed Polina S
Электроэнергетика — это красиво! https://t.me/artlebedev/7794
🔥11❤7👀2👏2
Signed Polina S
Нет, это не я. Вы ошиблись.
👀9😱6⚡3❤2🥱1
Signed Polina S
Как же поживает атомная энергетика: Министр энергетики Германии: «Отказ от атомной энергетики был огромной ошибкой… нам не хватает этой энергии». Предлагает корректировать курс, потому что Европа слишком сфокусировалась на климате и недооценила фактор стоимости энергии. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/german-energy-minister-calls-nuclear-phase-out-huge-mistake В Японии перезапустили атомный энергоблок …
🔥4❤3⚡1👍1
Signed Polina S
Как механизм управления спросом на электроэнергию вышел из «местечковой» темы в федеральную повестку [Для тех, кто хотел про коммуникацию] Все мы были новичками в чем-то. А новичкам обычно дают задания, которые никто не хочет делать. Сложно, тяжело и «неинтересно». В энергетике у меня это была тема управления спросом на электроэнергию. Писала про каждый отбор. Ночами разбиралась в результатах - у кого сколько мега…
❤16🔥7👍6💯5
Signed Polina S
Новости: Программу модернизации старых ТЭС предлагают переместить за пределы 2031 года, сделать бессрочной На фоне переносов сроков модернизации вправо и отмен звучит вполне логично. Сделать переносы бессрочными
🤣7👍4
Signed Polina S
МЭА как всегда очень оригинально Крупнейший в истории кризис на рынке нефти. Хуже, чем в 1973 году. Агентство снова всем советует на удалёнку и поменьше летать… каждый раз одно и то же. Прошлый нефтяной кризис привёл к самой масштабной стройке АЭС в мире как альтернативе углеводородам. 🫥 Как там поживает атомная энергетика?:) Ссылка на доклад МЭА тут https://www.iea.org/news/new-iea-report-highlights-options-to-…
🤣7🔥4❤2
Signed Polina S
Биткоин vs кВт•ч Центробанк выпустил Обзор рисков финансовых рынков По данным ЦБ за 12 месяцев: Криптовалюты — худший финансовый инструмент. «Отрицательная полная доходность была отмечена у криптовалют (минус 31,2%)». За февраль — минус 14,6% Электроэнергетика — в плюсе. Полная доходность — плюс 8,8%. За февраль — минус 1,2% Лидеры: «За последние 12 месяцев наибольшую полную доходность показали золото (59,1%) …
👍7👀3🤣3😱2
Signed Polina S
Если я всё правильно поняла, то на энергетическом языке это звучит так: - для ЦОД и майнинга предлагается отменить одноставочный тариф на передачу - в качестве объема платы за мощность в двухставке брать максимальное значение из: •среднее из дневного потребления в рабочие будни (отмена пиковых часов СО) •среднее из круглосуточного потребления все дни месяца •90% от макс потребления https://www.kommersant.ru/doc…
❤3👍3💯3🔥2
Signed Polina S
Девочки, с праздником! мы — сила! ❤️ Энергетика — мужская отрасль. Большинство моих контактов в телефоне — мужчины. Женщин в энергетике немного, но каждая — уникальна. В каждой — стойкость, мудрость, та самая нежность и эмпатия, без которой невозможно развитие. Каждая — восхищает своим умом и дальновидностью. В каждой — жизнь и искренность. Мы-то знаем, что без нас всё было бы сложнее и намноооого скучнее!!🥰 Мужч…
❤23🔥9💯4👏3😱1
Signed Polina S
Только сейчас осознала: как удивительно быстро летит время! Тем выше его ценность! https://t.me/polina_svet/371 ПС: год прошёл
🔥15❤10👏2
Signed Polina S
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @polina_svet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📱 Нужен ваш совет. Открывать канал в МАХ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,324,050 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“P.S. Верно подсвечено” (@polina_svet), 1,005 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polina_svet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.