Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НААНС-МЕДИА

Channel

НААНС-МЕДИА

@naansmediapublic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,081subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291068748
TypeChannel
Username@naansmediapublic
Created6 September 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/naansmediapublic

Growth

1,0811,0841,082.56 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,081 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,081–1,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:151,081-1
13 Aug 2026, 04:571,082-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:541,083-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:421,084+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:211,083no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:531,083first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 1,081 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,108
Reactions total71
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6684.6%
🔥67.69%
33.85%
👏33.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📊 По итогам за июль 2026 года нефтегазовые доходы бюджета составили - 934 млрд рублей, рост относительно июня 2026 года +250 млрд рублей, достигнув пикового значения за период с мая 2025 года. В январе - июле 2026 года нефтегазовые доходы бюджета составили 4595 млрд рублей, снижение -17% относительно предыдущего года несмотря на рост мировых цен на нефть в марте-июле на фоне разрастания Ближневосточного конфли

👍2👏1🔥1

Signed Tamara Safonova

3 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Изменение рынка акций российских нефтегазовых компаний за торговую неделю с 27 по 31 июля 2026 года, подготовленный НААНС-МЕДИА: ⛽️ Газпромнефть 🔼 6,17% от 427,60 до 454,00 рублей ⛽️ Татнефть 🔼 5,33% от 499,30 до 525,90 рублей ⛽️ Сургутнефтегаз 🔼 3,02% от 14,74 до 15,19 рублей ⛽️ Роснефть 🔼 2,42% от 339,50 до 347,70 рублей ⛽️ Лукойл ➖ 0,01% от 4630,00 до 4630,50 рублей 🔋 Новатэк 🔽 -0,22% от 10

👍7

Signed Kirill Babushkin

3 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📊 Представляем обзор бункерного рынка за июль 2026 года, подготовленный МАВUХ. В июле мировой бункерный рынок формировался главным образом под влиянием геополитических факторов, волатильности цен на нефть, региональной динамики предложения и логистических ограничений. Ключевыми драйверами рынка стали: → Геополитическая напряжённость на Ближнем Востоке: сохраняющаяся неопределённость вокруг Ормузского пролива и ма

👍4

Signed Andrey Andreev

3 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC75 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Выбор прогнозируемого сценария по мнению подписчиков НААНС-МЕДИА

  1. 🔽Пессимистичный сценарий - 80-90 $/bbl33%
  2. ➡️Базовый сценарий - 91-101 $/bbl67%
  3. 🔼Оптимистичный сценарий - 102-120 $/bbl0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Andrey Andreev

3 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC73 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @energytodaygroupPhoto

Фактически сложившиеся на биржевой площадке ICE Brent - цены, а именно - средневзвешенное значение фьючерса на нефть сорта Brent с поставкой в сентябре - с 27 июля по 2 августа 2026 года - $88,5 за баррель, что соответствует нашему пессимистичному сценарию. Цены на нефть Brent на прошедшей неделе находились в диапазоне: - от min $84,1 за баррель во вторник - до мах $90,7 за баррель в четверг Наше видение прогн

Signed Andrey Andreev

2 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📊 Еженедельный обзор динамики нефтяных котировок на международных биржах от НААНС-МЕДИА На межконтинентальной торговой площадке ICE по итогам торгов в пятницу 31 июля 2026 года расчетная стоимость поставок в сентябре североморской нефтяной смеси Brent / ICE Brent Settlement Price остановилась на отметке 90,12 $/bbl, продемонстрировав недельный рост на 1,76 $/bbl. На ближневосточной товарной бирже GME стоимость реги

👍3

Signed Alexander Andreev

31 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ФАС начала возбуждать дела из-за цен на бензин. Что грозит компаниям и как это скажется на стоимости топлива Чем грозит компаниям такое внимание ведомства и как это отразится на стоимости бензина, "Российской газете" рассказали эксперты. «Последствия для компании зависят от того, что именно выдала ФАС: предупреждение или предписание с чётким сроком для устранения нарушения. Невыполнение предписания влечёт админ

👍1

Signed Ирина

29 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Изменение рынка акций российских нефтегазовых компаний за торговую неделю с 20 по 24 июля 2026 года, подготовленный НААНС-МЕДИА: ⛽️ Татнефть 🔼 16,53% от 442,90 до 516,10 рублей ⛽️ Лукойл 🔼 9,28% от 4316,50 до 4717,00 рублей ⛽️ Газпром 🔼 9,16% от 85,40 до 93,22 рублей 🔋 Новатэк 🔼 8,65% от 937,90 до 1019,00 рублей ⛽️ Роснефть 🔼 8,53% от 324,60 до 352,30 рублей ⛽️ Газпромнефть 🔼 7,27% от 393,95 д

🔥3👍2

Signed Kirill Babushkin

29 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Infotek_RussiaPhoto

Мини-НПЗ — спасение топливного рынка? Власти озвучили идею строительства в стране мини-НПЗ, которые будут производить бензин Могут ли мини-НПЗ спасти от топливного кризиса, каким потенциалом обладают действующие заводы малой мощности, каких процессов им не хватает и как может помочь Китай — в статье доктора экономических наук, генерального директора ООО «Независимое аналитическое агентство нефтегазового сектора» Та

👍3🔥21

Signed Ирина

28 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️По мнению аналитиков, значительный подъем спроса со стороны дата-центров, ориентированных на ИИ, уже создает сильную нагрузку на электросети страны. Сохранение таких быстрых темпов роста спроса может привести к дефициту электроэнергии, поскольку генерирующие компании не имеют возможности вводить в строй достаточный объем новых мощностей, отмечают эксперты. МЭА ожидает, что мировое потребление электроэнергии ЦОДам

👍3

Signed Ирина

27 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @energytodaygroupPhoto

Нефть Brent завершила неделю (20–26 июля) на отметке $94,4/барр. по средневзвешенному значению — в рамках оптимистичного сценария прогноза НААНС-МЕДИА для Energy Today. Диапазон недели: от $89,2 в понедельник до $100,7 в четверг. Главные драйверы роста — остановка перевалки на КТК после атаки беспилотника на танкер NELSA и заявление хуситов о блокаде Баб-эль-Мандебского пролива. На неделю 27 июля – 2 августа аналитик

👍1

Signed Andrey Andreev

26 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC145 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📊 Еженедельный обзор динамики нефтяных котировок на международных биржах от НААНС-МЕДИА На межконтинентальной торговой площадке ICE по итогам торгов в пятницу 24 июля 2026 года расчетная стоимость поставок в сентябре североморской нефтяной смеси Brent / ICE Brent Settlement Price остановилась на отметке 96,8 $/bbl, продемонстрировав недельный рост на 7,6 $/bbl. На ближневосточной товарной бирже GME стоимость регион

👍3

Signed Alexander Andreev

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @naansmediapublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Выбор прогнозируемого сценария по мнению подписчиков НААНС-МЕДИА

  1. 🔽Пессимистичный сценарий - 80-90 $/bbl33%
  2. ➡️Базовый сценарий - 91-101 $/bbl67%
  3. 🔼Оптимистичный сценарий - 102-120 $/bbl0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Выбор прогнозируемого сценария по мнению подписчиков НААНС-МЕДИА

  1. 🔽Пессимистичный 70-80 $/bbl13%
  2. ➡️Базовый 81-91 $/bbl50%
  3. 🔼Оптимистичный 92-110 $/bbl38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 245,129 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НААНС-МЕДИА” (@naansmediapublic), 1,081 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naansmediapublic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.