Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Lee — Вибрации

@lee_vibrations

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,918subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396416152
TypeChannel
Username@lee_vibrations
DescriptionАвторский канал lee об осознанном творении своей жизни. все ссылки - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/1780 Дзен - https://zen.yandex.ru/lee_vibrations чат - https://t.me/lee_chat Рекламу не размещаем
Created9 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lee_vibrations

Growth

29,91829,96129,939.56 August 2026 — 29,961 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,961 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,952 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,941 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,924 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,925 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,918 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,912–29,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:2729,918-7
12 Aug 2026, 00:1529,925+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:5329,924-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:5129,932-9
8 Aug 2026, 16:3429,941-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:0129,952-9
6 Aug 2026, 18:1529,961no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4929,961first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 29,918 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,910
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held45 (31 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total221,110
Reactions total16,059
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,860
Videos
414
Links
8,490

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,059 reactions across 45 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,12550.6%
🔥2,83117.6%
❤‍🔥1,3228.23%
👍1,0986.84%
custom 53976090529916793384802.99%
🐳4232.63%
custom 58124503405654222132251.40%
😁1861.16%
🥰1651.03%
custom 53144703445458331541440.897%
🙏1350.841%
💯1320.822%
🤩1260.785%
🕊1240.772%
😍970.604%
🤔850.529%
🦄780.486%
custom 5375583150732749356500.311%
👏410.255%
330.205%
25 further kinds1590.99%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,059reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈1,570 views224 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли название у нашей цивилизации? ❓ВОПРОС: Была цивилизация под названием Лемурия, а какое название нашей нынешней цивилизации? ❗️ОТВЕТ lee: Ну, они так себя не называли. Это был период начала землян как людей на континенте Му. Причём длинный период сотен тысяч лет, в котором были разные народы из разных звездных колоний. В общем виде, если тысячелетия складывать в эпохи, то Лемурия – это первая эпоха – заселени

❤‍🔥88🔥6146👍13🤣5🕊3😁2🙏2

14 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈2,430 views218 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Как смотреть глазами Источника на страдания животных? ❓ВОПРОС: Понимаю, что мои страдания от страданий бездомных животных из-за точки зрения, отличающейся от точки зрения Источника. Но я не понимаю, как смотреть на это глазами Источника, когда им больно. или им на самом деле не больно и они это так не воспринимают? Что я упускаю? ❗️ОТВЕТ lee: Ваши страдания – это отдельный процесс. Вы его создаёте сами, и он никак н

128🔥44custom 539760905299167933817👍10🕊8❤‍🔥6🐳5

14 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC≈2,610 views159 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🌸 🌸 Чудесного дня! Вспомнить пост - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/4689

84🔥33custom 539760905299167933817👍13💯6🕊4🐳1👌1

13 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈3,300 views414 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Как не сожалеть об несостоявшемся материнстве? ❓ВОПРОС: У меня нет детей. Я приняла этот факт. Но иногда всё же накатывают горькие мысли, что не продлила свой род, что нет полноценной семьи с детками, и самая гнетущая мысль, что с возрастом это будет больнее ощущаться, что внуки – это тоже не про меня. Я осознаю свою ценность и без детей, но всё же кажется, что жизнь заиграла бы другими красками, если я была бы мамо

250custom 581245034056542221344👍39custom 539760905299167933831❤‍🔥17🐳14custom 53755831507327493568🦄6

13 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,080 views695 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли смысл молиться Богу ❓ВОПРОС: Мне попалась книга «Беседы с Богом» Уолша. Что Ты думаешь про эти беседы. И есть ли смысл молиться Богу, если, в принципе, всё зависит от нас самих? ❗️ОТВЕТ lee: Замечательная серия книг. Кажется там было 4 книги (а далее уже комментарии к ним) – все они последовательно расширяют друг друга. И там Бог прямо говорит автору «я и есть ты». То есть, если вы проследите логику, то вопр

371❤‍🔥104🔥93💯38🙏22👍20🦄17custom 581245034056542221316

13 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC≈3,480 views160 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

😎 Удивительного дня! 😎 🫥 Вспомнить пост - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/4687

102👍29😁13🐳8custom 53976090529916793387🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,990 views580 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Главная сила конспирологов — ваше внимание ❓ВОПРОС: Уважаемый lee, насмотрелся видео про конспирологию, тайное правительство, на верхушке евреи владеют абсолютно всеми компаниями, манипулируют через корпорации всеми людьми, делают патенты на растения, распыляют в атмосферу химикаты… Если так и есть внешние силы, которые мы выбрали для этой симуляции - какова наша цель в этом абсурде? Кто практикует, уже наблюдал как

254🔥156❤‍🔥68👍48🐳17custom 531447034454583315415😁11🕊7

12 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈3,750 views329 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Пересекаются ли ветки реальности ❓ВОПРОС: Очень хочется верить, что всё так и происходит в нашем мире. Но смущает, что есть предел между микромиром, где частицы могут быть в суперпозиции, и макромиром, тут работают законы не квантовой физики, а классическая физика. Я далека от физики, но про декогерентность слышала. И ещё «прыжки» между ветками реальности не очень понятны. Они противоречат ведь закону сохранения эне

188🔥63👍33🤔14🐳12🕊5🥰5🎉4

12 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC≈3,820 views179 reactionsread 14 August 2026

❤️💘 Красивого дня! Вспомнить пост - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/4683 🤍 Открытый вебинар "ЛЮБОВЬ, любовь, влюбленность": YouTube - здесь, Дзен - здесь

102🔥20custom 581245034056542221317custom 539760905299167933810❤‍🔥7🍓6🥰6👍5

11 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈4,490 views503 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Справедлив ли мир? ❓ВОПРОС: Мир справедлив? ❗️ОТВЕТ lee: Вселенная – это Машина. Она безупречна. Даже если вы что-то считаете не-справедливым, Вселенная учтёт триллионы всех нюансов во всех смыслах и измерениях – в итоге (если можно вообще говорить об итогах) всё идеально будет скомпенсировано. Ваше мнение тоже будет учтено с бесконечным вниманием к тому пути, как вы пришли к своему мнению и с пониманием того, куда

🔥174169😁62❤‍🔥27🙏17🐳16🤩14💘11

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,230 views198 reactionsread 14 August 2026

😀 Вебинар «Новое Сознание. Тело как доказательство» | Начало https://youtu.be/BSMVH1wFlnI?si=zzPL-vv5hGMOipPJ время просмотра - 08мин 47сек Подробнее о вебинаре «Новое Сознание. Тело как доказательство» - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/9889 ➡ Посмотреть видео на Дзен - здесь 😀😀😀😀 🎞 Видеоцитаты из вебинаров lee - плейлист #видеоцитаты #новоесознание

127🔥36👍10🐳75❤‍🔥5🤩4💯2

11 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC≈4,190 views216 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

💜 🪷 Увлекательного дня! Вспомнить пост - https://t.me/lee_vibrations/4680

130🔥29👍20🦄13❤‍🔥10custom 53976090529916793389🐳5

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @lee_vibrations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,435 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

👻 Ченнелинги! Вести оттуда!
@Chennelingvesti · 32
10 posts
💖 Отношения? Отношения!
@otnosheniya_otnosheniya · 20
5 posts
Bhaktin Julia
@bhaktinjulia · 216
3 posts
💃🕺 И не ЗОЖем единым...
@i_ne_zozh · 72
2 posts
Человек
@isceleniegizni · 6
2 posts
Мужчины! Кто они?
@muzhchini_kto_oni · 18
2 posts
СвобоДА быть собой!❤️
@svoboda_inbox · 216
2 posts
Проводник к Душе_ Александра
@a_novskaya · 249
1 post
Заметки на полях моей жизни
@altviks_life_path_nodes · 31
1 post
ДаталияМ
@DNataliaM1 · 8
1 post
Дом Души
@domus_animae · 98
1 post
Елен Милк Таро | секреты реальности
@elenmilk · 97
1 post
Pythia
@Happypickles_Mcgee · 31
1 post
Саморазвитие, амулеты, мастер-классы.
@healingamulet · 101
1 post
ПОХУДЕТЬ РАЗ И НАВСЕГДА! Это возможно!
@hudeemrazinavsegda · 30
1 post
🌏 Искатели
@iskateliistini · 32
1 post
🌝 КОЛОБОК КОЛИБРИ💥
@kolobok_kolibri · 80
1 post
ЯСНО ВИДЕТЬ
@maru_energy · 362
1 post
Музочная
@new_age_muse · 442
1 post
🐬 Обо всём!
@obo_vsemvnasheyzhizni · 130
1 post
Худеем! 🔥 И Точка ●|Тренировки| Нутрициология
@shapelypeople · 56
1 post
Триединство со Светланой Дубровской
@triedinst_vo · 503
1 post
Я разРЕШАЮ ВСЁ
@ya_mihina · 265
1 post
💃Женщинам о женщинах! О мудрости и глупости!
@zhenschinamozhenschinax · 18
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ада Кондэ - личный канал - Ada Conde
@Adaconde1 · 126,047
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Тимофей Кармацкий
@karmatsky_timofey · 186,889
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Zarina del Mar/Про Тебя
@WhatevaCircle · 111,697
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Светлана Драган
@svetlanadragan · 115,927
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lee — Вибрации” (@lee_vibrations), 29,918 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lee_vibrations.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.