Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Boris Pastukhov

Channel

Boris Pastukhov

@b_pastukhov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,021subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001714886572
TypeChannel
Username@b_pastukhov
Created20 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/b_pastukhov

Growth

25,00525,02125,0136 August 2026 — 25,008 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,014 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,011 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,005 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,007 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,017 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,015 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,005 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,014 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,021 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,003–25,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:5325,021+7
15 Aug 2026, 17:1525,014+9
14 Aug 2026, 02:1525,005-10
12 Aug 2026, 23:3525,015-2
12 Aug 2026, 00:5225,017+10
11 Aug 2026, 03:5825,007+2
10 Aug 2026, 06:2125,005-6
9 Aug 2026, 05:0225,011-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:1825,014+6
6 Aug 2026, 09:4925,008first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

15,992 reactions across 20 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,25045.3%
3,87524.2%
🔥1,5379.61%
💯9365.85%
🤔8575.36%
😁6484.05%
😢1901.19%
🤡1150.719%
😱770.481%
🎄670.419%
👎660.413%
👏530.331%
💊460.288%
🤮330.206%
👀310.194%
🗿270.169%
🕊230.144%
🤣150.094%
🙏130.081%
🥴130.081%
26 further kinds1200.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,992reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
115
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @b_pastukhov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 December 2025 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC≈125,000 views569 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026

Сегодня ночью вышла внеочередная «Кухня», посвященная статье Мельниченко (какой-то номер в списке Форбса) в The Economist. Ссылку я вешать не буду: кто не подписан на канал - подпишитесь, и вам воздастся. Вместо этого я выложу музыкальный эпиграф и цитату из него. It takes a certain kind of man with a certain reputation To alleviate the cash from a whole entire nation Take my loose change and build my own space stat

🔥288👍13894🤔17😁12💯6🥴5🤝3

4 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC≈26,900 views862 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026

Часть моей ленты соцсетей заполнена фотографиями Медведева на похоронах Аятоллы с разными ироническими комментариями о причинах его тоскливо-депрессивного вида. Одной из причин, безусловно, может быть легендарное «на его месте должен был быть я»,- и проблема эта для Кремля нешуточная. Казалось бы, физически защищаться российским лидерам надо только от украинцев, США и союзники, очевидно, не будут пытаться убить лиде

👍527112🤔94😁54💯30🔥19👀11💊8

13 Jun 2026, 21:08 UTC≈35,200 views915 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

По ощущениям, наиболее схож с оппозицией в России новогодний «Голубой Огонек». Одни и те же лица, с одним и тем же репертуаром, из года в год пытаются добиться изменения суммы, переставляя местами слагаемые. Эпиграф к этому действу двести лет как написал Крылов: «А вы, друзья, как ни садитесь…».

💯485👍218😢78😁5228🔥15🤔13🍾9

27 May 2026, 06:57 UTC≈45,800 views835 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

На главной странице BBC статья дня посвящена подбору переговорщика от ЕС с Россией и озаглавлена «Can EU find a Russian whisperer to mediate an end to war in Ukraine». В русском переводе даже появляются дополнительные смыслы: «Сможет ли ЕС найти заклинателя* для переговоров с Россией для окончания войны в Украине». «Заклинатель» в этом случае - как индийский заговорщик змей, который заставляет ядовитую кобру покладис

👍517💯13478🤔37🔥18😢18🤯9👎8

26 Apr 2026, 05:30 UTC≈161,000 views681 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026

В Вашингтоне, судя по всему, произошло очередное неудачное покушение на Трампа. В отличие от многих комментаторов и некоторых общественных деятелей, никакого злорадства я не испытываю: вопрос не только в самом Трампе (и тех, кто около него находится), но и в нормализации идеи о политическом насилии, как таковом. Чем чаще происходят (даже неуспешные) политические покушения, тем чаще сама идея их совершать будет оказыв

👍455111💯53🤔28🔥11👎10🤡6💊4

13 Apr 2026, 17:56 UTC≈42,900 views489 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

Так мы узнали, что Пиночет не был диктатором https://t.me/voinasordoy/5969

😁298👍9923🤡19🤣13🤔11💯10🔥8

27 Mar 2026, 16:55 UTC≈50,700 views405 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @mideastr

И вчерашний эфир с @b_pastukhov Мне кажется очень уютно получилось поговорить буквально обо всем: Путин, Трамп, Европа, Китай https://youtu.be/5S252eQlIQc?si=G65jrTnDy67sFo-2

👍28867🔥31🤔11🗿5👏3

15 Mar 2026, 15:30 UTC≈48,800 views407 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026

Сегодня с утра на "Живом Гвозде" коротко поговорили о перспективах нового Кубинского кризиса. https://youtu.be/c5nC2mmLDQE

👍30175🤔17👏9🔥4🗿1

8 Mar 2026, 20:01 UTC≈48,100 views1,176 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @v_pastukhov

Дмитрий Еловский под занавес сегодняшнего выпуска ЧКП спросил меня про мое отношение к тому, что Андрей Ланьков опубликовался в каком-то журнале, редактурой которого занимаются Сергей Караганов и Федор Лукьянов. Я в ответ вспомнил о судьбе несчастного Александра Бутягина, арестованного в Польше за то, что занимался археологическими раскопками в Крыму. На мой взгляд, это связанные случаи. Я бы мог поставить точку на

554👍333💯122🔥50🤔33🤮29🤡19👏15

3 Mar 2026, 05:36 UTC≈195,000 views823 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, несмотря на все происходящее, Иран начинает готовить почву для замирения с Америкой. По сообщению Аль-Джазиры, глава МИД Ирана выступил с заявлением, что Америка вступила в войну как бы «от имени» Израиля и потому кровь и иранцев, и американцев - «на руках израильтян», а «американцы заслуживают лучшего». Если это не подкладывание соломки для идеологического объяснения иранцам, почему с Америкой помирились (

👍447🤔20273😁41💯20🤡15💊9🙏5

28 Feb 2026, 14:44 UTC≈201,000 views1,528 reactions14 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Вышли в прямой эфир (первый для канала) вдвоем перед одной камерой (первый раз за три года) из Бахрейна с видом на горящую американскую базу за спиной. Если вы не придете посмотреть и пролайкать такой эксклюзив, то я не знаю, чем вас еще порадовать. Фото из окна номера прилагается. Ссылка на эфир ниже: https://youtube.com/live/3jvN8Dwjf9I

🔥903👍326179😱43🕊23👀20😁16💩7

5 Feb 2026, 22:39 UTC≈213,000 views1,517 reactions8 Starsread 16 August 2026

Прослушал интервью Марии Колесниковой и с интересом прочитал множество откликов на него, доходящих местами фактически до обвинений в оппортунизме. В связи с этим не могу не поделиться наблюдением. Русскоязычное политическое пространство в основном состоит из людей, публично говорящих о неприемлемости компромиссов с авторитарной властью, но при этом готовых тайно в отношении себя лично идти на подобные компромиссы. М

828👍498🤔73🔥47💯40👎8🥴8🤡6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @b_pastukhov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vladimir Pastukhov
@v_pastukhov · 153,856
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Boris Pastukhov” (@b_pastukhov), 25,021 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b_pastukhov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.