National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Самые Новые Известия” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 40 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @newizvestya — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,313–20,418 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:47
20,325
-8
16 Aug 2026, 02:16
20,333
-14
14 Aug 2026, 13:57
20,347
-12
13 Aug 2026, 05:18
20,359
-8
12 Aug 2026, 07:42
20,367
-9
11 Aug 2026, 07:24
20,376
-6
10 Aug 2026, 06:32
20,382
-18
9 Aug 2026, 04:21
20,400
-6
8 Aug 2026, 07:23
20,406
+19
7 Aug 2026, 04:42
20,387
-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:06
20,395
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
20,395
first reading
Engagement
122 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 20,325 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,310
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.377%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
122
of 122 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 121 of 122 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
122 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
404,212
Reactions total
1,518
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 37s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,307 reactions across 100 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
270
20.7%
❤
178
13.6%
😁
160
12.2%
👎
156
11.9%
👍
125
9.56%
🙈
80
6.12%
🤔
77
5.89%
😱
74
5.66%
🔥
60
4.59%
🤯
29
2.22%
😭
28
2.14%
💯
19
1.45%
🙏
19
1.45%
🕊
16
1.22%
👌
6
0.459%
💔
6
0.459%
👏
4
0.306%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,518reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 122 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @newizvestya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 122 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇩🇪 Германия на пороге логистического коллапса из-за обмеления Рейна
Продолжительная засуха привела к критическому падению уровня воды в одной из главных транспортных артерий Европы, сообщает N-TV со ссылкой на участников рынка.
На ключевом участке Рейна в районе Кауба утром в субботу уровень воды составлял всего 8 сантиметров, а ночью опускался до 6 сантиметров. Для нормального прохода барж необходимо не менее 40 с…
❗️ Instagram* мог стать одним из факторов миграционного кризиса в испанской Сеуте
В соцсети обнаружили сеть аккаунтов, которые показывают опасный путь в Европу как легкую прогулку и продают инструкции по пересечению границы, — расследование BBC.
Журналисты нашли десятки взаимосвязанных профилей, ориентированных преимущественно на молодых марокканцев. Они публикуют привлекательные ролики с людьми, которые якобы легк…
NYT: страны Балтии и Венгрия не доверяют Франции и Германии переговоры по Украине
Ряд европейских государств сомневается, что Париж и Берлин смогут в полной мере учитывать их позиции в случае начала переговоров по урегулированию конфликта на Украине. Об этом пишет The New York Times со ссылкой на трех европейских чиновников.
По данным газеты, наибольшее недоверие испытывают небольшие страны, граничащие с Россией и …
🤓 Российские школьники стали хуже запоминать и анализировать информацию на фоне активного использования ИИ
Примерно у трети российских школьников наблюдается снижение когнитивных функций, заявила клинический психолог Ирина Грекова. По ее словам, одной из причин может быть чрезмерное использование нейросетей в учебе.
«Примерно у трети школьников отмечается снижение когнитивных функций. Чем больше ребенок общается с …
👨🔬 Подъем по лестнице вместо лифта может снизить риск ранней смерти, выяснили ученые
Регулярное использование лестницы связано с укреплением сердечно-сосудистой системы и увеличением продолжительности жизни. Наибольшую пользу, по данным исследования специалистов Университета Восточной Англии, может приносить подъем примерно по шести лестничным пролетам в день.
В исследовании приняли участие почти 500 тысяч человек…
Трамп поручил вернуть паровые катапульты на новые американские авианосцы
Президент США Дональд Трамп распорядился пересмотреть проект строящегося авианосца USS Doris Miller класса Gerald R. Ford. Вместо электромагнитной системы запуска самолетов он предлагает использовать традиционные паровые катапульты, а современные подъемники вооружений заменить гидравлическими.
В Белом доме решение объясняют стремлением упрости…
Голикова назвала регионы России с самой высокой рождаемостью
Чечня и Тыва лидируют среди российских регионов по коэффициенту рождаемости. Об этом заявила вице-премьер Татьяна Голикова во время рабочей поездки в Челябинск.
По ее словам, в этих двух республиках сохраняется расширенное воспроизводство населения — то есть рождается достаточно детей не только для замещения поколения родителей, но и для роста численности…
🇺🇸 Госдолг США вплотную приблизился к отметке в 40 триллионов долларов
С начала июля американский государственный долг вырос более чем на $500 млрд — с $39,389 трлн до $39,913 трлн к середине августа, следует из данных Минфина США.
За первые десять месяцев 2026 финансового года расходы американского правительства на обслуживание долга и выплату процентов достигли рекордных $963 млрд.
В ближайшие годы долговая наг…
В Британии изменили маршрут энергокабеля за £430 млн из-за «могилы» Добби
Разработчикам энергетического проекта стоимостью £430 млн пришлось скорректировать маршрут подводного кабеля между Великобританией и Ирландией после жалоб поклонников «Гарри Поттера», пишет The Telegraph.
Причиной стал пляж Фрешуотер-Уэст в Уэльсе, где снимали сцену смерти эльфа Добби в фильме «Гарри Поттер и Дары Смерти». После выхода картин…
❤10🤔4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @newizvestya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 6,331 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Новые Известия” (@newizvestya), 20,325 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newizvestya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
