Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Проект «УРК»

@urkproject

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,823subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887814055
TypeChannel
Username@urkproject
Created11 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/urkproject

Growth

2,8232,8282,825.57 August 2026 — 2,828 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,827 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,823 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,822–2,829 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:532,823-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:212,827-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:022,828first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 32s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15845.0%
10028.5%
🔥4813.7%
👏195.41%
😁174.84%
👀61.71%
🤡10.285%
🤩10.285%
🫡10.285%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 09:15 UTC473 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В последнее время в сети много споров о данном изделии. Его характеристики полностью не раскрываются, алгоритмы работы известны лишь поверхностно. Споры идут о малой эффективности из-за отсутствия БЧ. Но как человек, который использует её лично, хочу сказать, что два пуска с разницей в 15 минут, два сбитых борта это нереальный показатель — всё это произошло при развёртывании "более эффективного" и сложного в управлен

👏186👍6

6 May 2026, 09:04 UTC431 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Varyag_bplaVideo

Отряд «Варяг» с помощью дрона-перехватчика «Ёлка» сбил очередной вражеский БПЛА. Враг усиливает атаки БПЛА на Курскую область, но мы крепко держим оборону. 🤩 Отряд БПЛА «Варяг»

10👍6🔥4

6 May 2026, 09:03 UTC424 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Елка» — оптико-лазерная система для перехвата БВС. Алгоритм работы: 1) Тепловизор видит тепловой след мотора цели. 2) ИК-прожектор подсвечивает БПЛА — он становится виден «как на ёлке». 3) Лазерный дальномер даёт точную дистанцию. 4) Встроенный и обученный ИИ рассчитывает траекторию цели, что не оставляет шансов для дрона противника. Условные технические характеристики: • Масса комплекта 150–250 г • Тип матрицы т

👍3

20 Nov 2025, 13:17 UTC≈2,400 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Долгожданные установки

👍16🔥63

20 Nov 2025, 12:53 UTC≈2,510 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

До 2026 года, ценник на наше оборудование остается прежний. Советую долго не думать и не делать ставку на халяву! Ваша жизнь, намного дороже денег! Сделать предзаказ - @urksvyaz_bot

12👍3🤡1

13 Nov 2025, 17:03 UTC≈2,400 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Доброго всем! Готовимся к серьёзной сертификации 🙏🙏🙏. А пока красивые кадры от наших крылатых братьев ! ❤️ @urkproject

👍12🔥31

1 Nov 2025, 19:35 UTC≈2,220 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dontstopwarVideo

Прекрасный солнечный день... К сожалению эта фраза не относится к нашим соотечественникам, проживающих в приграничных регионах так как дождь , морось, туман это шанс на хоть какое то спокойствие и это типичные будни. Нашей группой был осуществлён выезд в Брянскую обл. для проведения мероприятий, встретились/познакомились со всеми профильными ведомствами обеспечивающими безопасность граждан, надеюсь решения будут

14👍4🔥3

26 Oct 2025, 20:00 UTC≈2,060 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поступают лестные отзывы о РЭБ и бесперебойном аккумуляторе. Спасибо друзья за ваше доверие, приняли в оборот очередную партию ваших заказов. Оформить предзаказ можно через наш Бот обратной связи - @ukrprodaja_bot Остерегайтесь мошенников.

16

11 Oct 2025, 21:12 UTC≈2,700 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ребята, не тот РЭБ берете…

😁17👀5🤩1

6 Oct 2025, 08:51 UTC≈2,360 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скоро будут доступны предзаказы.

👍4🔥3

24 Sept 2025, 19:22 UTC≈102,000 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Доброго вечера всем! Хотел сказать спасибо всем, кто помог нам организовать эти испытания! Низкий поклон нашим инженерам! Также хотим сказать спасибо всем участникам канала 🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR и участникам каналов наших друзей. Без вас ничего бы не получилось, ваша поддержка дала стимул работать в этом направлении. Почти год назад мы мёрзли на полигоне на первых наших испытаниях в Подмосковье и мечтали вывезти, “обкатат

19👍9🔥5

23 Sept 2025, 17:45 UTC≈2,360 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ещё одно доказательство того, что техника на тяжёлых направлениях - расходник! Парни живы, а это главное! Работаем мужчины ! @urkproject

11👍6🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @urkproject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇷🇺 DONTSTOPWAR
@dontstopwar · 245,328
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проект «УРК»” (@urkproject), 2,823 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/urkproject.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.