Channel
@dnyqqbj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
120,578subscribers
+7,526 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001177631396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyqqbj |
| Description | 本群内容：🏆曝光频道🏆 广告投放 投诉建议 🌈🌈🌈请联系： @shiyyyy016 🌈曝光信息一定要真实。我们也没办法去调查信息的真假。如果有误联系管理就行。请不要纠结我们。谢谢 ⚠️频道广告不作担保，上门探访过属于担保，如有担保会进行备注：认证广告！！！ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyqqbj |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 120,578 | -1,319 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 121,897 | +5,268 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 116,629 | -312 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 116,941 | +2,970 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 113,971 | +2,953 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 111,018 | -471 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 111,489 | -2,841 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 114,330 | -286 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 114,616 | -126 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:24 | 114,742 | -174 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:46 | 114,916 | -132 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 115,048 | -110 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 115,158 | -140 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 115,298 | -125 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 115,423 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 115,457 | -135 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 115,592 | -310 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 115,902 | -217 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 116,119 | -155 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 116,274 | first reading |
826 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 468 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 826 (12 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,286,365 |
| Reactions total | 88 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 354 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 96 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 7.77% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 7.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 6.80% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 96 of the 826 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 826 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😃😃😃😃 经典品牌，返水高、出款快，热门游戏应有尽有！别人赢的不是运气，是敢上桌；你不来，永远只看别人爆。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 😖 做代理，佣金稳定，靠谱！！！ 😒 没有不负责的平台只有不负责的上级 😫 给我一分信任，我还你十分满意！ 😎 一线传三代，人走线还在，造福后代你只差一个靠谱的平台 🎁全网最燃福利盛宴，与😃😃😃并肩，踏上辉煌征程！尊享时刻，独一无二，每步璀璨，每秒传奇。速来加入，共铸不朽荣耀！🎁 群主担保链接 r6503.top 🥰 官方招商专员： @kyqp00002 ✅
西港，这是当街绑架？ 9月25日凌晨2时许，西哈努克市第4分区奥彻迭海滩附近疑似发生一起掳人事件。 一名男子被强行推入车内带走，现场情况引发关注。目前，警方已介入调查，具体案情及涉案人员身份尚待进一步确认。 压力来到刑警部门
#网友投稿：“西港”红灯笼隔壁，独牙附近，宪兵队正在沿街开展例行检查，途经人员以及附近的兄弟注意！
#菲律宾新闻 菲律宾网络犯罪投诉暴增 每10宗有7至8宗涉网诈等案件 NBI行动量接近翻倍 9月24日，菲律宾国家调查局局长梅尔文·马蒂巴格在参议院公布最新数据，目前NBI收到的投诉中，平均每10宗就有7至8宗属于或涉及网络犯罪，包括网络诈骗、欺诈及其他利用数字平台实施的犯罪。 NBI的执法行动也大幅增加。2025年平均每月约110次，今年4月前后开始增至每月200至220次，行动量接近翻倍。 马蒂巴格还表示，菲律宾离岸博彩业被禁止后，部分原有从业人员和经营者转向诈骗据点及加密货币相关犯罪，网络犯罪手段也在持续变化。 随着案件和行动数量增加，NBI希望加强技术设备和网络犯罪调查能力，包括提升对深网、暗网等网络活动的监测。
Bitget热钱包突发安全事件，涉及约3.516亿美元 9月25日凌晨2:31，Bitget监测到部分热钱包及温钱包发生异常转账，初步涉及约3.516亿美元。平台表示，冷钱包未受影响，用户账户余额准确，相关损失由规模超过4.64亿美元的用户保护基金覆盖。 目前充币和交易功能正常，提币功能暂时关闭。异常地址已被标记，执法部门及链上安全机构已介入调查。 Bitget将在24小时内公布完整报告，包括事件原因及整改措施。 PS：保护基金确实能兜底，但3.5亿美元不是小数目。现在大家最关心的，还是提币什么时候恢复。
1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣—1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣ 游戏机器人：@feitou（👈点击进入） 正版厂商 · 盘总首选 · 商会保障 · 大额无忧 飞投娱乐 · 妈祖庇佑 · 商会护航 · 一起玩赢 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ U充U提不限iP 多重炸裂活动持续上线 官方频道每天发6个红包 游戏多福利好 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@fjsh 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@usdb 🐋🐋🐋🐋： fjsh.com 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣：@feitou
#木姐突袭电诈窝点爆发枪战 抓获543人 9月23日，军方下属安全联合部队突袭掸邦北部木姐市一处网络诈骗窝点，与曼比民团发生枪战，部分军警受伤。 行动共抓获543人，其中中国公民188人、缅甸公民355人，缴获人民币70余万元、手机58部及武器5件。当地居民称，被捕人数或达约800人。 PS：这是哪个盘总的公司被团灭了
我说名声怎么坏了，原来是关系淡了 刚从中国到菩萨的时候，我们两个关系好得不得了。一起吃饭，一起上班，一起熬夜聊天，什么话都敢说，什么事都敢讲。那时候别人都说我们是最佳闺蜜，我也是真把你当成了自己人。 后来不知道从什么时候开始，话越来越少，联系越来越少，见面也变得客客气气。以前无话不说的人，慢慢变成了朋友圈都懒得点赞的人。我一直以为只是大家忙了，没想到关系淡了以后，连曾经说过的那些私话，也成了别人嘴里的故事。 最难受的不是别人怎么说我，而是那些话，偏偏是从你这里传出去的。因为别人不了解我，说什么我都可以不在乎，可你是知道事情原委的人。 你知道我当时经历了什么，也知道哪些是真的，哪些是气话，哪些只是我们两个人之间的玩笑。 现在再回头想想，我终于明白了一件事。有些人不是突然变坏的，只是关系好的时候，她愿意替你解释；关系淡了以后，她甚至懒得管真相是什么。 以前一起吃苦的时候像亲姐妹，后来翻脸了，却恨不得把彼此最难堪的那一面都翻出…
这个质量可以啊 帮群友问问什么价位啊
#网友爆料：缅甸御龙湾最大黑公司老板“苹果”，个子很矮，103办公室，做中国股票，残害中国同胞，军方二公子长期保护，无视中国打击！ 里面对外宣称没有一个公司，军方二公子也经常在哪里驻军，只要二公子过去，就不允许进出，有动静就往旁边107躲避，然后又回去。 苹果本来在经常来办公室，他这个人谁都不相信，只要没业绩就不允许下面，前面还会殴打员工，现在不会打，但是会体罚，比打更难受。他的后勤“金发”，一个赌鬼，出了名的黑，对外宣称可以接未成年骗招，只要是个人都可以接。 苹果开会表面又说不需要骗招，真的当面一套、背后一套，还请军方二公子看清此人，取缔该公司。这个公司真的给你们军方抹黑，实在太黑了，没有新曾200深蹲，一个星期没开单不允许回宿舍。 该公司柬埔寨七星海搬过来的，在七星海发生死人事件，很多人知道。二公子你自己好好掂量，别为了这么家把自己折进去，果敢四大家族就是你们的后果。
🇮🇹 AI冒充高管克隆声音 意大利一银行被骗9500万欧元 据消息人士披露，诈骗分子利用AI技术冒充高管，从意大利最大银行Intesa Sanpaolo旗下的私人银行Fideuram盗走9500万欧元（约1.08亿美元）。 今年2月，诈骗团伙伪造集团CEO的即时通讯信息，并利用AI深度克隆知名律师声音拨打电话，诱导时任Fideuram董事长保罗·莫莱西尼安排向中国内地及香港等地的海外账户转账。 银行随后发现异常并报警，经多国执法合作成功追回约5300万欧元，但仍有约3600万欧元经多国账户清洗并兑换为加密货币后下落不明。高管团队未被调查，莫莱西尼已于3月辞职。米兰检方目前已对一名涉案的外籍嫌疑人展开调查。
#2026世界杯 #美加墨世界杯 #体育内幕 #足球包赢 #协议足球 🚨迎战2026世界杯，四年一次的机会，有人发财，有人洗白，抓住机会你就能上岸发财，公司世界杯渠道已经全部对接好，有资源来打爆狗庄‼️ 💎全网寻找大量的赌博平台下注合作，我们做的是协议球，协议球的意思就是假球，所有足球比赛都有内幕‼️ 🔈我们公司专注协议球渠道，只要你手上有资源，有赌博平台、体育盘口下注，我这边给你提供足球或者其他体育内幕料，只要你能下注成功，能出款就是捡钱，比赛做了协议就是包赢。 如果比赛输了，我们公司包赔下注本金，比赛赢了盈利五五交收‼️ 🌐合作进频道联系财神：https://t.me/+J60FmYP9PqNjNDU1
Showing the 12 most recent of 826 posts we hold for @dnyqqbj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光” (@dnyqqbj), 120,578 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyqqbj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.