Channel
@PG681
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
34,535subscribers
-412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001433337290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PG681 |
| Description | #迪拜 #柬埔寨 #东南亚 #泰国 #缅甸 #金三角 东南亚头条大事件，专注于海外华人最新动态咨询，悬赏通缉，揭露事实，曝光真相！ 合作/重大爆料联系： @aikeke88 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PG681 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @PG681/19757 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC | @baoguang821/1115007 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC | 1.00 | 70 minutes |
| @PG681/19767 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC | @baoguang821/1115047 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @PG681/19760 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC | @baoguang821/1115057 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC | 1.00 | 68 minutes |
| @PG681/19762 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC | @baoguang821/1115107 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC | 1.00 | 60 minutes |
| @PG681/19766 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC | @baoguang821/1115127 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC | 1.00 | 64 minutes |
| @PG681/19769 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC | @baoguang821/1115167 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC | 1.00 | 70 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @baoguang821 | 9 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 66 minutes | this entry (9–0) |
| @ershouflb | 8 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.8 hours | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @PG681 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 34,535 | -76 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 34,611 | -60 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 34,671 | -102 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 34,773 | -73 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 34,846 | -90 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 34,936 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 34,947 | first reading |
189 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 189 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 57,037 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
冒充 中国特务 诈骗156万港元 19岁女大学生被捕 香港一名24岁男子遭骗徒冒充电讯公司职员及中国公安，以涉嫌“洗黑钱”为由实施层层诈骗，最终被骗逾300万港元（约156.2万令吉）。 骗徒要求男子入住酒店并定时汇报行踪，随后安排19岁女大学生冒充“中国特务调查人员”，向其出示伪造证件及盖有假公安印章的保密协议。 香港警方调查后，于8月11日在上环拘捕该名19岁女大学生，并在其住所检获疑似伪造执法证件、文件及打印机等物品。 警方调查发现，该女子疑被诈骗集团招揽充当“调查人员”，负责与受害人见面并交付假文件，而幕后同党始终未露面。 罪行，根据香港法例第210章第17条，定罪最高可判监禁10年，年轻人切勿因一时受诱而沦为诈骗集团工具。
🙂↕️😜😘🔤🔤😀🤩🔤🤩🤩🤩 🌐：官方U投网址： 000.com 1️⃣体育赛事2️⃣真人娱乐3️⃣PG电子 4️⃣彩票游戏5️⃣棋牌对弈6️⃣捕鱼游戏 免费观看体育赛事直播 ：000.liven 🇧🇷3️⃣🤩4️⃣3️⃣3️⃣4️⃣4️⃣😘🙃4️⃣4️⃣ 🥇实力派平台 🙂↕️😜😘🔤🔤😀🤩 🥈众多福利等你来拿 ⭐️新人六重豪礼 ⭐️娱乐反水最高1.10% ⭐️YGG电子单注最高20000+ ⭐️七日连签领豪礼：满签直拿164U ⭐️新人专享礼包最高可领：10000U 曝率拉满，入场即赢：🔤🔤😀🤩 🥉无需实名 无需绑卡 不限IP 🌐：官方U投网址：000.com 极致优势 资产秒提 零审必出 体育赛事免费高清直播：000.liven 欢迎各位老板加入000体育娱乐城！ 😀 官方飞投：@ty000com_bot 😀 申请客服：@TY000KF 😀 活动频道：@T
#国内资讯：警惕全新视频通话骗局！蚌埠警方近期侦破了一类新型盗取付款码诈骗案件。 骗子通过社交软件和受害人接通视频通话，聊天过程中，会以视频验证、身份核验、刷单、开通会员等各种理由，诱导受害者打开手机付款码页面。 很多人以为只是给对方看一下屏幕并不会出事，殊不知骗子会利用视频高清画面，远程拍下你的付款条码，直接完成扣费盗刷。不需要拿到你的手机，仅仅通过视频画面，就可以转走账户内资金。 警方温馨提醒大家：微信、支付宝付款码属于资金支付密钥，绝对不要在视频通话里展示付款码。无论对方是什么理由，只要让你亮出付款码，一律视作诈骗。
#柬埔寨新闻 【柬泰贸易逐步趋稳 前七月总额16.1亿美元】 尽管陆路口岸持续关闭，2026年前七个月柬埔寨与泰国双边贸易额达16.1亿美元，较2025年同期的24亿美元有所下降，但同比降幅已从1月的43.5%收窄至7月的32.7%。柬埔寨对泰出口降幅14%，至4.2亿美元，自泰进口则下降37.5%，至11.9亿美元。贸易逆差由约14.1亿美元缩减至约7.7亿美元，显示商业活动在冲击后渐趋稳定。
#福建跑路狗大财：吃我的喝我的，还玩消失。 福建人大财，之前混西港，柬埔寨扫荡后跑缅甸，在那边朋友处待不住又跑来投我。到这没几天，吃住全包还预支钱，结果不到10天直接跑路。 给他时间还钱，刚开始嘴上说有了就给，后面信息不回，彻底装死。本来不想撕破脸，但这态度太恶心，就当喂了狗。东南亚的盘总们，接到这货自己掂量，人品烂到根了。
#柬埔寨资讯：金边市波森芷区某本地村庄发生一起疑似抛尸事件。 据当地村民举报，在一处废弃工地的地下水道内发现一个可疑行李箱，现场疑似存在尸体迹象。接到报警后，当地警方迅速赶赴现场，并对事发区域进行封锁，禁止无关人员靠近。目前，警方正在对现场展开勘查，并进一步确认行李箱内具体情况。 截至目前，案件相关身份信息、死亡原因以及是否涉及刑事案件等情况尚未公布，警方调查工作仍在进行中。
#群友爆料：新加坡有家园区公司，打着公司待遇很好的幌子，实际上是一家黑园区。 最开始在国浩大厦，公司老板叫默，外号，当地那一层楼都叫他莫老板。主管外号叫无影，组长有三个，一个叫牛牛，公鸡，可乐。天天压榨员工，只要是花钱买来的员工，就会被不停地压榨，直到压干为止。没有任何利用价值，就叫联系家里打赔付。 当地也有关系，每次团建我在门口听老板打电话，叫李哥、黄哥的，所谓关系网不浅。起初是从柬埔寨搬过去的公司，现在公司位于裕廊，一个偏远的工厂，一栋楼。 希望能通过曝光舆论打击一下该园区，园区名字叫光明园区。我朋友花了70w才肯放人，回来人都有点不正常了。被骗过去的，听说里面还有上百号人是骗过去的，里面基本上都是自愿参加诈骗的。此园区长期买卖人口，望通过帖子镇压一下。以上都属实。
菲律宾大事件曝光 pinned a video
人民币真人盘 ❗️大额出款无忧❗️ 东南亚顶流线上博彩平台👍👍👍👍 在全网上押500000USDT押金 #东南亚顶级高爆电子台！😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌 USDT存出款，东南亚盘总首选U台👍不限ip 提款无上限！ 😍王者加冕 · 荣耀诞生：真人中一路连胜，尽显实力!成功累计提款6320000❗️👈点击查看 17年老品牌台子 电子百家乐 0风控 包出款 PG电子最高可20000一拉 真人最高可50万一注 ➡️福利频道： @PGDZ169 💬客服专员： @huaxian 🥹 🐖注册网址： qs2426.cc 👈
#菲律宾新闻 【西南季风持续影响菲律宾多区宣布8月13日停课】 菲律宾多个地方政府因西南季风持续影响，宣布8月13日（星期四）停课。国家气象局表示，季风正影响吕宋岛西部地区，部分地区将出现阴天及分散至大范围降雨。目前国家首都区、科迪勒拉行政区、中央吕宋及甲拉巴松等区域已列入停课名单。更多更新信息将持续发布。
#马来西亚新闻 【前总稽查署署长称未被传召作证感失望】 马来西亚前总稽查司玛蒂娜声称，在针对朝圣基金局的皇家调查委员会程序中，她虽准时到场并等候逾30分钟，却未被传召作证，认为自己的申述权被剥夺。调查报告指其2014至2017年审计缺乏坚定立场，但她辩称决定基于审计证据及国际标准。
#越南资讯： 银行反诈拦下近5.5万亿越南盾 超150万客户及时停手 越南国家银行8月11日在2026年银行业数字化转型发布会上公布最新反诈数据 截至7月，银行反欺诈系统已向超过460万人次客户发出诈骗风险警告。 收到警告后，超过150万人次客户选择暂停或取消转账，涉及资金近5.5万亿越南盾 避免资金继续转入存在诈骗风险的账户。越南国家银行从2025年开始运行支付欺诈风险管理、监测和预警系统，通过银行账户及电子钱包等信息识别异常交易，并在客户转账前发出提醒。 目前，越南银行业还在持续清理和核验账户身份信息，超过1.67亿份个人客户资料及278万份机构客户资料已完成生物识别信息核验。
Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @PG681. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 809,469 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件曝光” (@PG681), 34,535 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PG681.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.