达沃市长将出席弹劾法庭作证 菲律宾参议院弹劾法庭本周恢复听证,达沃市长塞巴斯蒂安·杜特尔特与前参议员特里连礼示将出庭作证。副总统萨拉·杜特尔特的弟弟预计今明两日到庭,特里连礼示可能在今日至周三期间作证。 检方将重点追查副总统涉嫌来源不明财富。达沃市长将作为敌意证人,就被迫说明副总统申报的商业利益,涉及49份地方合同、金额约3500万比索。特里连礼示预计披露杜特尔特夫妇67亿比索财富的来源。反洗钱委员会执行主任布埃纳文图拉预计10月1日或2日被传唤。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren

Channel
菲律宾大事件
@dnydxw
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,142subscribers
-28,003 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001017926995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnydxw |
| Description | #菲律宾 #东南亚 #新闻 #资讯 #曝光 菲律宾大事件频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 ✅发布信息联系: @zhuanren 商务合作: @geren |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnydxw |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 71,142 | -15,845 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 86,987 | +9,160 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 77,827 | -543 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 78,370 | -591 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 78,961 | -1,047 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 80,008 | -2,831 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 82,839 | -10,256 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 93,095 | -1,341 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:35 | 94,436 | -902 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 95,338 | -645 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 95,983 | -608 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 96,591 | -299 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 96,890 | -280 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 97,170 | -100 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 97,270 | -128 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 97,398 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 97,435 | -84 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 97,519 | -117 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 97,636 | -91 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 97,727 | first reading |
Engagement
1,272 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.13%
- avg views ÷ 71,142 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,220
- 711 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.053%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 711
- of 1,272 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 711 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,272 (7 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,580,703 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈25,700
- Videos
- ≈1,330
- Links
- ≈16,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 19s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 18.5% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
注意!大马尼拉多地今晚停水,最长7小时 大马尼拉部分居民注意!马卡蒂、马尼拉和帕赛多个地区将于9月29日晚至9月30日凌晨停水,最长约7小时。 Maynilad Water Services Inc.表示,此次停水时间为9月29日晚上7点至9月30日凌晨2点,原因是马尼拉市Quirino Avenue及Osmeña Highway部分路段进行供水审计。 受影响区域包括马卡蒂市、帕赛市及马尼拉市多个Barangay,涉及范围较广。 Maynilad提醒受影响居民和商户提前储水,并表示停水期间将安排供水车待命,必要时为受影响地区提供饮用水。 住在相关区域的华人注意提前检查自家所在Barangay,别等到晚上打开水龙头才发现没水。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
菲律宾交通罢工3天 ,9月28日至30日 ,大岷区出行或受影响 菲律宾国家首都地区警察办公室(NCRPO)表示,9月28日至30日大岷区将迎来连续3天交通罢工,警方已在交通总站、主要道路、商业区、学校及购物区等重点区域加强警力部署。 警方预计部分公共交通车辆可能减少,通勤者或面临候车时间延长、交通拥堵等情况。不过,目前并非所有线路都会停运,部分司机和运营商仍可能正常提供服务。 为应对可能出现的乘客滞留,NCRPO将协调地方政府及交通部门提供“免费乘车”服务,帮助受影响的通勤者前往工作地点、学校及住家。 警方同时表示,将保障运输团体和平表达诉求的权利,但不会允许有人恐吓或阻拦继续运营的司机。 9月28日至30日需要在大岷区出行的华人,尤其是依赖公共交通上下班、上学或接送孩子的家庭,建议提前安排出行时间,并及时关注当地交通及罢工最新消息。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0…
菲律宾48家企业资料疑外泄 信息通信技术部紧急调查 菲律宾信息通信技术部9月25日表示,近日发现一起疑似资料外泄事件,初步涉及可信评估服务商认证项目中的48家企业及约410份文件。 据初步调查,相关资料容量约600兆字节,解压后约770兆字节,文件可能包含企业登记、许可证、认证材料、网络安全资质,以及部分员工资料和企业评估文件。 菲律宾国家计算机应急响应团队已介入调查,目前重点核实这些文件是否真实、来源何处,以及是否确实属于相关认证项目企业。 信息通信技术部表示,如果最终确认涉及个人资料或其他受法律保护的信息外泄,将依据数据隐私相关规定采取措施,并通知可能受影响的企业。 目前调查仍在进行,官方尚未确认约410份文件全部为真实资料,也没有公布具体受影响企业名单。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
近日 X 社交平台流传一张配图,刻意制造观点对立,歪曲了菲律宾参议员丽莎・洪蒂维罗斯与众议员切尔・迪奥克诺关于校园枪击议题的立场。 网传图片说法:迪奥克诺认为根源在于枪支,洪蒂维罗斯则认为问题出在手机。 实际情况并非如此。洪蒂维罗斯一方面呼吁收紧枪支管控,同时也提出要重视心理健康、网络极端主义以及网络平台的责任。迪奥克诺则联署相关决议,要求在全国范围开展校园安全审计。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
交通罢工影响通勤 首都多地启动免费乘车 菲律宾首都地区9月28日出现交通罢工,多地政府紧急调派车辆,为受影响的通勤者提供免费乘车服务。 马尼拉埃尔米塔的Kartilya ng Katipunan已设立免费乘车点,马拉邦市从凌晨5点起启动接驳服务。地方政府表示,将根据交通调度情况,把车辆派往需求较大的区域。 与此同时,部分运输团体仍维持正常运营。此次罢工预计持续3天,运输团体主要抗议燃油价格上涨,并要求调整运价。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
拉克森促迪松证达义无幽灵工程 2026年9月28日,菲律宾参议员拉克森要求公共工程部长迪松证明达义市不存在幽灵工程。拉克森指出,公共工程部自身记录显示,该市一个项目的现场地理标签位于600公里外的莱特省。 该项目合同编号220B0106,承包方为Discaya家族所有的St. Timothy Construction。该项目的预付款及多笔进度款所附照片坐标均指向莱特省,与达义市实际位置不符。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
海关承认管理漏洞,申请100亿比索建设销毁设施 海关查获的走私肉,本该依法销毁,结果却被曝重新流入市场,面对议员的质疑,菲律宾海关局局长阿里尔・内波穆塞诺承认,这类管理漏洞确实存在。 他解释称,海关目前缺少专项经费来建设属于自己的走私货物销毁处理场地,现阶段只能外包给私人承包商处理没收物资。外包模式下,货物管控链条更容易出现缺口,因此海关希望国会能够提供支持,自建销毁设施,从根源上减少货物外流的风险。 财政部长吴诗泽也在听证会上说明,海关已经在2027年度预算中申请追加100亿比索,部分资金计划用于建设查扣走私品的专用销毁设施。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
大批警察突查马卡蒂红灯区!警方连夜加强治安巡逻 菲律宾马卡蒂警方9月26日晚出动大批警力,对韩国街红灯区及多个重点区域展开突击检查和治安监督。 行动从晚上9时持续至11时,参与警力包括各警察分局、特警队、机动部队及增援部队,重点检查固定岗哨、主要道路、商业区和娱乐场所的警力部署情况。 警方表示,此次行动主要是评估治安管控和警力应急状态,同时加强重点区域巡逻和反犯罪行动。 警方还提醒在岗人员提高警觉,并要求摩托车骑手在停车或等候载客时摘下头盔及蒙面头套,以便警方进行识别和治安管理。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
杜特尔特案证据增至62130份!辩方要求砍到1万份以内 前菲律宾总统罗德里戈·杜特尔特在国际刑事法院的案件中,检方披露的证据材料已增至62130份。 杜特尔特辩护团队9月25日提交文件,要求法院大幅压缩证据范围,并建议最多保留1万份。 辩方表示,案件确认指控阶段检方最初披露的证据仅5275份,如今已增加至62130份,材料规模大幅扩大,给辩护团队审阅和准备案件带来压力。 辩护团队认为,部分材料可能存在重复、无法辨认、未经核实或与案件关联有限等情况,因此希望审判庭要求检方进一步筛选。 按照辩方提出的1万份上限,目前超过5万份材料可能需要被排除。不过,最终哪些证据可以进入审理范围,仍由国际刑事法院审判庭决定。 目前杜特尔特案预计于11月30日开庭,随着开庭日期临近,双方围绕证据范围及审判准备的争议仍在持续。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhu…
一知名国际公司遭菲政府关闭!这样的环境,谁还敢来? 一家在澳大利亚经营多年的教育、培训及招聘集团近日遭菲律宾政府整顿,旗下5家公司及关联企业被下令关闭。 菲律宾劳工与海外就业部门9月25日通报,AUSPHIN PTY LTD、AUSPHIN GROUP及关联企业涉嫌在没有取得必要授权的情况下,在菲律宾开展海外招聘及安置业务,因此被发出5份关闭令。 调查显示,这些企业涉嫌招募菲律宾人前往澳大利亚工作,涉及厨师、酒店及旅游等行业,并向求职者收取培训、材料及签证等费用,按照官方通报所列项目,部分申请人累计支付超过40万比索。 菲律宾当局表示,相关负责人可能面临非法招聘指控,企业还可能被取消营业许可及公司注册。 值得注意的是,AUSPHIN集团自2012年起运营,业务涉及职业教育、培训、招聘及签证移民服务,并在多个国家开展业务。此次菲律宾方面调查的重点,并非其海外培训资质,而是其在菲律宾开展海外招聘业务是否取得当地规定的授权。…
别再卖了!菲律宾FDA宣布这个商品商家不得再卖 华商注意!菲律宾食品药品监督管理局近日发布公告,点名一款正在市场流通的维生素C产品,认定其属于未经注册的健康产品。 被点名的是“Webber Naturals维生素C 500毫克片剂”,120片装。菲律宾食品药品监督管理局表示,经上市后监测发现,该产品没有完成菲律宾规定的注册程序,也没有取得相应的产品注册证书或授权文件,因此提醒消费者不要购买或使用。 同时,监管部门要求相关商家停止销售、分销该产品。按照菲律宾相关规定,未经授权的健康产品不仅不能销售,进口、分销、转让、推广和宣传等行为同样受到监管。 在菲经营保健品、药品及跨境商品的华商要注意,产品进入市场前务必确认是否完成菲律宾当地注册并取得合法销售授权,否则可能面临监管处罚。 😍 订阅菲律宾大事件频道 ↓ 🔗 t.me/+5KMoYfiPPRozYWQ0 😀 投稿爆料联系:@zhuanren
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,272 posts we hold for @dnydxw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 467,845#1
@BG_BG8 · 38,746#2
@cctv_dy · 36,686#3
@AQzx_3 · 93,113#4
@kanxia · 470,157#5
@baoguangba0 · 155,609#6
@heicaibaog · 83,485 (as read 16 August 2026)#7
@BG576 · 376,817#8
@baoguang_w · 47,000#9
@baoguang212 · 17,370#10
@uu888u · 1,744#11
@ke5689 · 167,871#12
@dny099 · 75,081#13
@MB_149 · 121,941#14
@flwph66 · 168,355#15
@aa144 · 35,225#16
@nnccqq · 38,432#17
@uae918 · 87,186#18
@quanwangbaoguangb · 148,210#19
@bg99599 · 95,505 (as read 16 August 2026)#20
@tx100 · 158,539#21
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#22
@BG423 · 33,478#23
@quanwangBG1 · 1,690#24
@baoguang85 · 31,656#25
@dnyxst · 70,799#26
@AQzx_1 · 175,586#27
@sii76 · 200,375#28
@dongnanya108 · 161,350#29
@bominwang18 · 4,647#30
@flbhuarenquan · 68,887#31
@dnybgtt · 53,637#32
@xinwen811 · 207,923#33
@bbb1b · 348,524#34
@jrttbg · 157,522#35
@kk4568 · 126,337#36
@kz692nn · 139,774#37
@tghuarenba · 44,364#38
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#39
@Gaosl · 1,095#40
@GTR133 · 8,137#41
@mianbeitongjiling · 30,330#42
@dnyggg · 43,934#43
@a0159 · 128,346#44
@bodu08 · 58,821#45
@oxkkk · 11,358#46
@zhaopinqiuzhi580 · 31,761#47
@qqt13 · 203,311#48
@feixingzhe0 · 58,575#49
@xigang13 · 63,166#50
@ZYWX6 · 101,169#51
@uuuuuf · 282,422#52
@xigang1 · 49,485#53
@SB919 · 128,290#54
@pzbgfabu666 · 354,924#55
@baoguang2022 · 148,798#56
@ChiGua8999 · 11,870#57
@jsj62 · 22,648#58
@DNYXSTJL6668 · 10,055#59
@DNYKX · 60,054#60
@baoguang211 · 24,074#61
@baoguang_g · 52,228#62
@AirdropVerifieSdss · 35,450#63
@dubai0 · 77,364#64
@BGSS8 · 1,029#65
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,661#66
@dny88 · 65,507#67
@ZaoTiePH · 3,390#68
@xigangz · 89,934#69
@VP2130123 · 4,028#70
@dubaixinwen2 · 221,985#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@baoguangba0 · 155,609
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@AQzx_3 · 93,113
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
@xigang1 · 49,485
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
@JPZ990 · 90,168
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 15 August 2026
@TGDSJ110 · 118,464
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
@dnanyakuaibaobgxs · 48,931
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 August 2026
@AQzx_2 · 80,997
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@BG576 · 376,817
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@AQzx_1 · 175,586
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@kanxia · 470,157
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 125,961
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@db2023dbg · 76,486
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@pianzi1 · 53,362
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@uae918 · 87,186
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 August 2026
@dnybgtt · 53,637
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
@w1666 · 102,034
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 120,578
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@dny2023dbg · 77,822
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@dsj665 · 113,606
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@flwph66 · 168,355
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
@GGooGG66 · 150,280
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@dny88 · 65,507
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@dnyxst · 70,799
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@xigang13 · 63,166
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾大事件” (@dnydxw), 71,142 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnydxw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.