🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器,帮你精准找到,想要的群组,频道,视频,音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮,进行搜索!

Channel
东南亚大曝光-悬赏-骗子频道
@gzhrsb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,459subscribers
-2,473 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001449309096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gzhrsb |
| Description | 东南亚行走指南-揭秘大事件-寻人-悬赏-曝光 #东南亚 #马来西亚 #越南 #老挝 #缅北 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #迪拜 #泰国 #曝光 #悬赏 ✍🏻投稿/爆料/悬赏/商务合作: @DNYnn911 欢迎大家订阅,频道内容发布均为投稿,揭露事实,曝光真相! |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gzhrsb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 27,459 | -333 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 27,792 | -466 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 28,258 | -525 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 28,783 | -926 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 29,709 | -223 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 29,932 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.14%
- avg views ÷ 27,459 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 588
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.44%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (8 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,883 |
| Reactions total | 251 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,000
- Videos
- ≈1,680
- Links
- ≈5,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
251 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 31 | 12.4% | |
| 👎 | 29 | 11.6% | |
| 💩 | 25 | 9.96% | |
| 😢 | 25 | 9.96% | |
| 🤮 | 24 | 9.56% | |
| 🖕 | 23 | 9.16% | |
| 🍌 | 22 | 8.76% | |
| 🤬 | 22 | 8.76% | |
| 😡 | 21 | 8.37% | |
| 💔 | 20 | 7.97% | |
| 🥱 | 9 | 3.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
— 专业索引工具 · 整合海量信息资源 — 索引机器 @SUOBOT|@SYJQ 专业的信息索引与搜索平台,能帮你快速发现、重要资讯,出海推广营销助手!telegram频道、群组、视频等内容收录检索。
🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器,帮你精准找到,想要的群组,频道,视频,音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮,进行搜索!
🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器,帮你精准找到,想要的群组,频道,视频,音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮,进行搜索!
— 专业索引工具 · 整合海量信息资源 — 索引机器 @SUOBOT|@SYJQ 专业的信息索引与搜索平台,能帮你快速发现、重要资讯,出海推广营销助手!telegram频道、群组、视频等内容收录检索。
🔍 超级搜索 TG必备搜索神器,帮你精准找到,想要的群组,频道,视频,音乐。 👇👇 点击下方按钮,进行搜索!
#柬埔寨资讯:班迭棉吉省突击检查10处场所:查获23名外国人,发现枪支、DU品及疑似电诈设备 8月9日,班迭棉吉省开展新一轮跨省联合检查行动。由班迭棉吉省副省长普拉克·波利率领联合工作组,在省法院副检察官萨姆里特·索孔协调下,对省内10处场所展开检查,其中2处因涉嫌涉及网络诈骗等违法活动被暂时关闭。 此次行动是在班迭棉吉省省长翁·拉泰直接指令下,由班迭棉吉省检察官库特·瓦纳雷特协调执行。 行动期间,工作组共查获23名外国人,其中包括1名女性。根据省政府报告,23人中有2名台湾籍华人、2名马来西亚籍华人,相关人员被送往波贝宪兵司令部;另有17名中国公民被移交波贝警察监察局处理。此外,还有2名中国公民,其中1人为女性,因持有有效证件,被允许继续留在当地。 此次检查涉及的10处场所情况如下: 地点1:位于奥克罗夫分区Samaki Meanchey村的一栋9层酒店,共有56间客房。检查期间未发现外国人及可疑物品,目前调查组已对…
💔10💩9👎7🖕7🤬6😈6🤮5😢5
#网友反馈 中国驻柬埔寨大使馆乱象。在大使馆门口看到了很多很多现象.有钱的搞定走人豪车接送.没钱的露宿街头蚊子咬的包数不清.双脚腐烂的.拄拐着徘徊的等。 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
💩9🍌8🖕8😡7🤮6🤬5😈5👎4
#柬埔寨新闻 柴桢警方继续扫荡木牌园区中~~有人试图从水田逃窜,都被警察给拦了回来! 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
👎12😈11😢8🤬6🍌5🤮5🖕4😡4
🚨 【黑台曝光:银河国际】充 2 万打出 5 万多遭恶意卡审核:凭实力翻盘却被无耻扣押,毫无格局的杀猪台! 充值 2 万元,自己凭本事一路打到 20 万流水、赢了 5 万多。中间两万本金甚至一度打得只剩 6000 块,完全是靠运气一点点翻盘上去的,结果申请提款后,平台硬生生以“审核中”为借口卡了一天半迟迟不出款。 输得起赢不起的无耻嘴脸: 这种平台赢了钱就扣上“刷流水套利”的莫须有罪名,吃相极其难看。 💡 避雷忠告: 毫无格局、赢钱就找借口不让下款的野鸡台根本走不长远!还在这个平台玩的赶紧提钱跑路,坚决避雷远离。 #黑平台曝光 #银河国际 #提现被黑 #审核中不给提 订阅 全球通缉-曝光-悬赏-骗子频道 ↓ 👉 https://t.me/gzhrsb ☎️投稿爆料,商务合作:@DNYnn911
😈9🤮8😢8😡7🍌6👎6💔5🤬5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @gzhrsb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TTDR8 · 84,663
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@QQ888880000 · 92,949
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@bgtjt · 80,867
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@dsj665 · 108,909
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 116,404
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大曝光-悬赏-骗子频道” (@gzhrsb), 27,459 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gzhrsb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.