Мужчины, что с вами стало?
custom 5229195151863218873555custom 5229235412886649108102custom 522875395564270561680custom 522916224811876364131

Channel
@daysmad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
187,663subscribers
-615 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001559471724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daysmad |
| Description | Всё об отношениях с девушками и саморазвитии. Опыт, знания и исключительно здравый смысл. Связь с автором/предложить контент: t.me/daysmad?direct Консультации: @spacerom Оферта: https://telegra.ph/Oferta-10-03-3 |
| Created | 29 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daysmad |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 187,663 | -186 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 187,849 | -118 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 187,967 | -122 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 188,089 | -112 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 188,201 | -77 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 188,278 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 853,300 |
| Reactions total | 33,421 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33,421 reactions across 25 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5229235412886649108 | 13,555 | 40.6% | |
| custom 5229195151863218873 | 11,165 | 33.4% | |
| custom 5228753955642705616 | 5,544 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5229162248118763641 | 3,157 | 9.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мужчины, что с вами стало?
custom 5229195151863218873555custom 5229235412886649108102custom 522875395564270561680custom 522916224811876364131
до приватки не особо задумывался над этим. вера в деда мороза это всегда сыро, тепло, комфортно, так и сидишь, ждешь деда, а он все не идет) теперь уже стало понятно, что деда мороза нет, а Мэд не злой и не гонит пургу, мотивируя меня, бедненького, оторвать жопу от стула, а рот от стакана с виски и идти выгрызать себе вкусный ништяк. спасибо Мэду, Саше и всей команде за такие вот посты, и за приватку, и за животворящ…
custom 5229235412886649108236custom 522875395564270561669custom 522916224811876364153custom 522919515186321887312
Если у многих современных женщин проблемы с верностью, лояльностью, уважением к мужчинам и в целом нравственностью, то ключевой мужской проблемой была и остаётся ИНФАНТИЛЬНОСТЬ. И выражается она в первую очередь в надежде, что однажды кто-то или что-то наконец-то изменит твою жизнь. Вот наступит нужная дата, произойдёт какое-то знаковое событие, появится правильный человек или окружение (само собой, конечно же), под…
custom 5229235412886649108558custom 5229162248118763641164custom 5228753955642705616116custom 522919515186321887319
У тебя есть выбор. Ты можешь либо дрочить, либо водить женщин по ресторанам, либо же зайти в приватку Мэда, освоить навыки соблазнения и каждую неделю трахать 2-3 красивых и востребованных девчонок. Ровно так же, как наш боец на этом скрине. Ты можешь и дальше быть зажатым, неуверенным и зависеть от чужого мнения, а можешь наконец-то присоединиться к лучшему мужскому сообществу, сформировать в себе стержень и жить …
custom 5228753955642705616223custom 522923541288664910868custom 522916224811876364153custom 522919515186321887315
Прекрасно осознаю, что этот тип просто байтит лохушек на лайки и комментарии. Но тем не менее я встречал огромное количество мужчин, которые действительно мыслят вот в таком ключе. Есть даже такая цитата: «Чтобы понять, насколько крут мужчина, ты должен посмотреть на то, насколько счастлива его женщина». То есть женщина — основной атрибут мужчины, женщина — основной показатель успеха мужчины, женщина — основная при…
custom 5229235412886649108802custom 5228753955642705616170custom 5229195151863218873140custom 522916224811876364145
Это видео посвящается всем тем, кто думает, что можно взять какую-нибудь гулящую Наташку и с помощью любви либо просто со временем обязательно её изменить. Так вот, посмотрите на эту женщину. Сколько ей лет? 40? 45? А она по-прежнему ведёт себя как глупая, голодная и абсолютно беспринципная малолетка. Сиськи на выкат, блядские танцы и яркий макияж, хотя по факту ей уже можно было бы внуков нянчить. Не меняются они …
custom 5229235412886649108879custom 5229162248118763641195custom 5228753955642705616131custom 522919515186321887359
У многих мужчин по факту есть лишь одна глобальная проблема с женщинами — завышенная значимость. Это ситуация, когда в центре твоей жизни находится именно её мнение, её оценка и её поведение. Отнеслась к тебе хорошо, и ты уже на коне. Стала холоднее или не ответила, и ты разбит, страдаешь и думаешь, где что сделал не так. Ну и когда мужчина осознаёт эту проблему, он приходит к мысли, что эту значимость нужно снижат…
custom 5229235412886649108835custom 5229162248118763641205custom 5228753955642705616139custom 522919515186321887328
Вопрос в личке 🥲
custom 52287539556427056161,210custom 5229195151863218873444custom 5229235412886649108187custom 522916224811876364133
Пожалуй, самая блевотная песня за последнее время, которая максимально оскотинивает современных женщин и вбивает им всем в голову, что они королевы. Потом удивляемся, почему в стране 80% браков распадаются, а каждая вторая нитакуся считает, что достойна получать всё только самое лучшее, отдавая взамен минимум.
custom 52292354128866491081,140custom 5229195151863218873352custom 5228753955642705616162custom 522916224811876364164
Блядь, как же заебали нищебродки. Подписчик рассказал историю о том, как познакомился в сети с девчонкой. Буквально пару дней общались, переписывались. И, собственно, на второй день общения она скидывает ему фотографию того, как ей делают маникюр, и говорит: «Скинь мне денег на маник, зай». Понятное дело, что наш подписчик был в ахуе от такой наглости. Говорит, что подумал, будто это вообще какой-то прикол или стеб…
custom 52292354128866491081,070custom 5229195151863218873301custom 5228753955642705616172custom 522916224811876364152
У вас тоже есть ощущение, что Рустам где-то просчитался?
custom 52291951518632188731,150custom 5229235412886649108211custom 5228753955642705616137custom 522916224811876364134
Ну наконец-то нормальный список требований к будущей жене. Я бы лишь добавил к нему ещё буквально несколько штрихов. Так вот, желательно, чтобы она занималась стрип-пластикой и по пятницам и субботам в свободное время танцевала где-нибудь в клубе пиджейкой. Плюс чтобы в прошлом у неё была какая-нибудь наркотическая или алкогольная зависимость, от которой она уже, слава богу, вылечилась. Ну и напоследок, конечно же…
custom 52291951518632188731,190custom 5228753955642705616238custom 5229235412886649108186custom 522916224811876364134
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @daysmad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 162,134 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа” (@daysmad), 187,663 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daysmad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.