Записываю искренние интервью с обычными людьми, которые меняют жизни тысяч других людей. Найти канал «Не принято обсуждать» можно на YouTube.
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=674ec333340096358bfa7838®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -141. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,186–27,369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:43
27,207
-25
16 Aug 2026, 02:03
27,232
-11
14 Aug 2026, 13:07
27,243
-25
13 Aug 2026, 04:35
27,268
-10
12 Aug 2026, 07:46
27,278
-22
11 Aug 2026, 07:11
27,300
-16
10 Aug 2026, 04:56
27,316
-12
9 Aug 2026, 03:54
27,328
-16
8 Aug 2026, 04:27
27,344
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:00
27,348
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:49
27,348
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 27,207 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
39 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
79,711
Reactions total
2,017
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,540
Videos
≈325
Links
≈354
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22m 41s
Average length
2m 50s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,017 reactions across 39 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
843
41.8%
🔥
519
25.7%
❤🔥
163
8.08%
🥰
100
4.96%
👍
88
4.36%
👏
54
2.68%
😍
49
2.43%
🤡
34
1.69%
🎉
24
1.19%
💯
20
0.992%
🤩
20
0.992%
💘
14
0.694%
💩
11
0.545%
🤗
11
0.545%
🤮
10
0.496%
🍓
9
0.446%
🙈
8
0.397%
😁
5
0.248%
🙏
5
0.248%
🤝
5
0.248%
14 further kinds
25
1.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,017reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,760
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,970
over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcaMN5Z
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Красотки, только посмотрите, какая колоритная съёмка шоу «Тарелочницы» получилась у нас в Екатеринбурге☕️😍
Тема огонь🔥🔥🔥и, конечно же, сразу хочу привлечь вас к обсуждению. Через сколько после знакомства вам сделали предложение?👇
Неважно, согласились вы или отказали, неважно, сколько продлился ваш брак. Интересен сам факт, как скоро прозвучало предложение? Своими ответами делитесь в комментариях👏
А я от души благо…
Красотки, не забывайте, что вы получаете не только заветные карты, но и доступ к ЧАТ-БОТУ с моим авторским прочтением каждой карты💞
✨️✨️✨️«КАРТЫ ЖЕЛАНИЙ» — последний раз в открытом доступе:
➡️➡️➡️ https://clck.ru/3V7X9T
🎁В ПОДАРОК: МОЙ ЖИВОЙ МАРАФОН «От хаоса к спокойствию» (с 22 по 29 августа)
Если у тебя уже есть колода, просто приходи на марафон:
➡️➡️➡️ https://clck.ru/3V7X9T
В комментариях делись, о чём для…
Девчонки! Скорее бежим смотреть!
Долгожданная «деревенская» распаковка авторской посуды и текстиля. Предупреждаю: будет так красиво, что вам придётся зажмуриться)).
P.S. Вы же помните, что при всём своём относительно светском образе жизни себя я называю деревенской кошкой? 🐈 Так вот - распаковываю свои заказы для деревенских, пасторальных сервировок в загородном доме в лесу.
#тарелочница #эстетствуем
Девчонки, как же радостно видеть, слышать и понимать, что наши с командой проекты прорастают в вас красивыми идеями, творчеством и плодами созидания💞
Только посмотрите, какую восхитительную утончённую юбку создала для меня Наталья Данилевич, вдохновившись проектом Главная героиня и оформлением нашей колоды Карт желаний✨️я уверена, что у всех, кто соприкоснулся с проектом и с колодой, есть своя маленькая история вдох…
Вас же не удивить банальным: когда закрывается одна дверь, открывается другая?)
Как вы думаете, что произошло, когда в апреле я приняла решение выйти из моей форум-группы в бизнес-клубе, стоимость участия в котором за год - это практически сумма с шестью нулями? Верно: совершенно неожиданно(!) меня буквально через несколько дней пригласили стать участником другой форум-группы с не менее сильным составом. Только тепе…
Девочки, не жмитесь, порадуйте себя! Карты чудесные, упакованы в красивую коробочку, рисунки яркие и четкие. Я свои купила на гастролях Ольги и ни разу не пожалела. Коробочка стоит у меня на столе, я каждый день ее открываю и достаю карту, чтобы поставить перед собой и насладиться рисунком и интересной фразой. Кстати, тасовать карты - это отдельное тактильное удовольствие!
Родная, как себя чувствует твоё сердце? Чтобы легче вступить с ним в диалог — успевай забрать мою колоду «КАРТЫ ЖЕЛАНИЙ» — последние экземпляры🔥🔥🔥
Последний раз в открытом доступе:
➡️➡️➡️ https://clck.ru/3V7X9T
🎁В ПОДАРОК: МОЙ ЖИВОЙ МАРАФОН «От хаоса к спокойствию» (с 22 по 29 августа)
Если у тебя уже есть колода, просто приходи на марафон:
➡️➡️➡️ https://clck.ru/3V7X9T
А в этом видео – о 10 минутах НЕ одиночес…
Ольга, честно, когда первый раз увидела стоимость ваших карт, тоже решила, что дорого.
При этом уже больше полугода в корзине на маркетплейсе лежат карты от 800 до 3500 руб.
И за это время я не одну не заказала, потому что не было отклика, в роде ничего и отзывы красивые, но не зацепило.
И в этот раз как и в первый почувствовала отклик на вашу колоду и решила, что лучше купить то что выбрано сердцем и пользоваться, ч…
❤36👍11❤🔥8🔥5🥰4🙈4💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @chebykina_o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Чебыкина” (@chebykina_o), 27,207 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chebykina_o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.