Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Акушева - к деньгам 🤟🏻

Channel

Акушева - к деньгам 🤟🏻

@akusheva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,027subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001066323722
TypeChannel
Username@akusheva
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akusheva

Growth

4,0274,0514,0397 August 2026 — 4,051 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,051 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,050 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,047 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,044 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,040 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,036 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,027 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 16 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,023–4,055 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 21:364,027-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:164,036-4
17 Aug 2026, 15:164,040-4
14 Aug 2026, 02:144,044-3
10 Aug 2026, 15:264,047-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:124,050-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:474,051no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:364,051first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.06%
avg views ÷ 4,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (13 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,221
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9442.9%
🔥8137.0%
👍3315.1%
👏62.74%
🙏31.37%
🤝20.913%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC151 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Меня тошнило, трясло и вырубало. И это был мой лучший день в работе за последние полгода Звучит как бред? Сейчас объясню. На днях я снимала 4 полноразмерных видео для своего YouTube-канала. Со мной был Валера Овечкин — человек, который знает про YouTube всё. Мы знакомы с 2013 года, и за это время он стал настоящим профи с серебряной кнопкой, звёздными гостями и тысячами подписчиков. И он сломал меня за два часа. В

15🔥5👍4

5 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC210 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочется закрыть бизнес и уйти в найм? У меня тоже такое было. В феврале этого года из-за постоянных изменений и запретов я хотела закрыть бизнес. Качественный отпуск, терапия и моя огромная любовь к делу (и пздц какой настойчивый характер, будь он неладен, этот максимализм в 37 лет!) привели меня к нереальному желанию расти дальше. И важное осознание, с которым мы должны смириться: по-старому расти сейчас невозмож

🔥42

3 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥4

3 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC258 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ТОП-5 ОШИБОК В ВАШЕМ КОНТЕНТЕ, из-за которых просмотры есть, а продаж — ноль. Разбираю ошибки, которые вы совершаете прямо сейчас. В июне проводила диагностику Елене (имя изменено), психосоматолог. Она активно ведёт соцсети, дублирует контент, снимает рилсы, пишет посты — но при всех стараниях результата нет. На контент уходила большая часть ее рабочего дня: постоянные посты, сторис, даже рилсы, а заявок с этого 1-

🔥5👍1🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC352 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍64

27 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC402 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вы всё ещё постите «про погоду, про природу»? Я только что разобрала 7 воронок, которые приносят деньги в 2026-м Я не продаю в лоб, а строю системы, которые продают сами и учу этому предпринимателей. Сегодня на эфире в клубе "Влиятель" разобрали эффективные воронки продаж в соцсетях, которые реально работают в этом году. Те, кто были на эфире, уже поняли главное: соцсети — это не витрина, а парк развлечений. Люди п

4🔥2🤝1🙏1

26 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC385 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Неочевидное правило больших продаж Предприниматели продают продукт. Богатые предприниматели - продают жизнь после использования продукта. Поясню на моём примере. Зачем я сделала пластическую операцию? Если бы я жила на необитаемом острове, без зеркал и медиа, мои грыжи под глазами мне бы никак не мешали. Но я сделала это, чтобы чувствовать себя более молодой, уверенной, чтобы нравиться себе. Я покупаю не удаление

👍8

24 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC407 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фотозагадка: что я делаю уже неделю каждый вечер по 3-4 часа?

5👍4

24 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC415 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мечтать о миллионах — легко. Делать — сложно. Итоги 4 недель, которые это доказали. Каждый день я вижу, как эксперты и предприниматели приходят ко мне с горящими глазами: «Хочу удвоить доход! Хочу выйти на новый уровень!». А через пару недель многие сдуваются. Потому что мечтать — это приятно. А делать — страшно, трудно и иногда больно. Но есть те, кто идёт до конца. Это участницы моей антикризисной группы. Они пр

6

22 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC339 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

РЫНОК БОЛЬШЕ НЕ ПРОЩАЕТ СЛАБЫЕ ПРОДАЖИ Кто-то уже откатился по прибыли на 2–5 лет назад. У кого-то упали чеки, ушли клиенты, перестали работать старые связки. До 30% малого и среднего бизнеса не переживут ближайшие 12 месяцев. Кризис — это не про то, что денег стало меньше. Это распределение денег между теми, кто умеет продавать, и теми, кто ждёт, когда станет полегче. В мае и июне я провела более 40 диагностик, у

🔥31👍1🤝1

20 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC337 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Для тех, кому удобнее читать и слушать подкасты в МАХ https://max.ru/ksenia_akusheva

2

18 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC419 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Целый день работаете — а доход не растёт. Правда, к которой многие не готовы⤵️ У каждого вида труда есть своя рыночная оплата, согласны? Работа клинера оплачивается как работа клинера. Работа ассистента — как работа ассистента. Это не оценочное суждение, это просто реалии рынка. И когда эксперт или предприниматель заполняет свой день задачами помыть пол, отвезти заказ, смонтировать ролик, арендовать площадку - он

🔥5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @akusheva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 622,978 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Афиша Екатеринбурга | Новости
@kudaekb · 76,615
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Акушева - к деньгам 🤟🏻” (@akusheva), 4,027 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akusheva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.