Welcome to the official ChainGPT Pad Announcements channel!
Stay in the loop with all the latest IDO launches, campaigns with partners, airdrops.
💬Discussion Group @ChainGPTNews
🌐Links
Website: https://pad.ChainGPT.org
X: https://x.com/ChainGPT_Pad
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,301–28,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:26
28,321
-14
12 Aug 2026, 08:05
28,335
-23
11 Aug 2026, 06:36
28,358
-21
10 Aug 2026, 09:01
28,379
-22
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
28,401
-25
8 Aug 2026, 03:02
28,426
-20
7 Aug 2026, 05:52
28,446
-9
6 Aug 2026, 23:02
28,455
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.57%
avg views ÷ 28,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
446
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
21 (15 June 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
5,347
Reactions total
215
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
749
Videos
63
Links
776
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
830 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
325
39.2%
🔥
194
23.4%
👍
149
18.0%
🤩
49
5.90%
🎉
39
4.70%
🥰
25
3.01%
👀
16
1.93%
👏
13
1.57%
🤯
11
1.33%
🙏
9
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Launchpad bot protection explained. Learn why bot defense decides who receives your token at launch and how to evaluate a launchpad's filtering before you commit.
https://blog.pad.chaingpt.org/post/launchpad-bot-protection-is-distribution-policy-not-security-tooling
Refund windows in token sales explained. Learn how a refund policy changes buyer mix, sale quality, and post-launch behavior, and how to set one without weakening a raise.
https://blog.pad.chaingpt.org/post/refund-windows-in-token-sales-what-they-actually-buy-a-launch
🚨 ChainGPT Pad is the first launchpad serving Arc, Circle's stablecoin L1 launching this summer!
Arc comes from the company behind USDC. USDC is the native gas, finality lands in under a second, and BlackRock, Visa and Goldman Sachs are already testing on it.
Every blockchain needs a launchpad. Ours is ready before the chain is.
🔹 Builders: applications to launch on Arc are open now
🔹 Users: KYC done + $CGPT stake…
🐝 5,000 Buzzers have joined the @pheasantnetwork Buzzdrop!
$200,000 in $PNT is on the table, and the pool is fixed - the higher you rank, the bigger your share.
📅 Campaign runs until September 13, 12 PM UTC
Stack points with your Buzz Links, on-chain quests, and referrals.
Start Buzzing 👉 [Buzzdrop Page](https://pad.chaingpt.org/pools/pheasant)
📣 KIMA → AERX Migration is LIVE. Deadline: 1 August 2026
If you took part in the KIMA giveaway on ChainGPT Pad, this one is for you.
We've updated the vesting schedule so you can claim your KIMA now and migrate before the window closes.
Do this today:
1. Claim your KIMA on ChainGPT Pad
👉 https://pad.chaingpt.org/pools/400000-in-kima-free-token-giveaway-228?completed=true
2. Download the StablePro Wallet app
Appl…
📢 Pheasant Buzzdrop: Campaign Extended
We've got an update for the community.
The Pheasant Buzzdrop is being extended. The new end date is September 13, 12 PM UTC.
The campaign has had a strong run so far. More than 3,600 Buzzers have joined, the leaderboard has stayed competitive throughout, and the momentum across the community has been hard to miss. So we're doing two things: opening up more time to participate…
You got a smaller buy limit than the person next to you because they staked $CGPT before the sale opened.
Locking $CGPT ahead of time moves you into a higher tier, and each tier raises how much of the token you're cleared to buy. The check runs automatically against your wallet, and the tier table is public on every sale page.
🚨 Meet Saleium: your white label launchpad and token infrastructure, live now.
Create, sell, vest, airdrop and stake your token on your own domain, under your own brand, with on-chain settlement.
One platform, five products: 🪙 Token Creator · 📈 Token Sale · 🔒 Vesting · 🪂 Airdrops · 💎 Staking
Fully self-serve. No listing gate, no sales call, no code. Connect a wallet and start free today.
🛡 CertiK-audited, built o…
🤖 AIVM Brain Waitlist is Live
Big release from our ecosystem today.
AIVM Brain turns your company's entire stack (Slack, Drive, Notion, GitHub, Salesforce and more) into one governed knowledge layer that employees and AI agents share.
What makes it different:
🔐 Every request is tied to an identity. Brain checks who is asking and what they are cleared to access before returning an answer.
🛡 Existing permissions sta…
$400M from Citadel Securities just tagged Crypto.com at a $20B valuation.
Citadel routes a huge share of America's retail stock trades, so a check like that reads as instant credibility.
The catch is that the same firm helping fill your trades now owns a piece of the exchange, and those two roles can pull in different directions.
Deep liquidity still gets earned trade by trade.
You committed $500 to a token sale and got some of it back in your wallet. That's normal, and it has a name.
It's oversubscription: more people wanted in than there were tokens, so every order shrinks to fit.
If demand runs double the supply, you get roughly half your order filled and the rest returned.
The sale just sold out with you in it.
🎁 Claims are open for the $CGPT Community Giveaway!
$50,000 in $CGPT is now yours to claim on ChainGPT Pad, split across 248 eligible stakers by their staking points.
→ Reward pool: $50,000 in $CGPT
→ Network: BNB Chain
→ Vesting: 2-year linear
→ Bonus: every token still vesting keeps earning you staking points
Go grab your tokens 👉 https://pad.chaingpt.org/pools/cgpt-50k-community-giveaway
❤73👍12👀7🥰7
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @chaingptpad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 738,638 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@chaingptpad named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pheasantnetwork named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ChainGPT Official Announcements Channel @ChainGPTNews · 410,660 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChainGPT Pad Official Announcements Channel” (@chaingptpad), 28,321 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaingptpad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.