✈️ Flying in for IBW? Skip the gate crowd and start your trip in a lounge ☕️ As IBT’s official travel partner, we’re offering Dragonpass lounge access for a flat USD 34 when you book your flights with us 🎟 Here’s how 👇 1️⃣ Book your flights at ibt.staynex.io/flights 2️⃣ Email [email protected] and receive your payment link 3️⃣ Get your Dragonpass for one lounge visit at any airport 🌍 ⚡️ Limited passes, so grab …

Channel
Staynex Announcement Channel
@staynexcomannouncement
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
57,186subscribers
-9,604 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001712122975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @staynexcomannouncement |
| Description | The Future of Social Travel - powered by Web3, AI and Membership ✈️ 🔗 Our Links: $STAY Official Token Contract, news & more! https://linktr.ee/staynexcomofficial |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/staynexcomannouncement |
Topic
Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 57,186 | -65 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:15 | 57,251 | -81 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:07 | 57,332 | -88 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:54 | 57,420 | -64 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:48 | 57,484 | -82 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:06 | 57,566 | -106 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 57,672 | -124 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 57,796 | -67 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 57,863 | -140 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 58,003 | -112 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:30 | 58,115 | -62 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 58,177 | -70 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 58,247 | -115 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 58,362 | -84 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 58,446 | -85 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 58,531 | -95 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 58,626 | -102 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 58,728 | -93 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 58,821 | -102 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 58,923 | first reading |
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.472%
- avg views ÷ 57,186 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 270
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.11%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 46 (26 May 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,350 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 651
- Videos
- 67
- Links
- 517
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 19s
- Average length
- 1m 20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
187 reactions across 43 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 37.4% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 28.9% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 6.95% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.67% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.14% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.535% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.535% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇮🇳 Heading to IBW Mumbai on 1 to 2 Nov? Don’t get caught out by event week prices 😅 As IBT’s official travel partner, we’ve got 4 star hotels below OTA rates, and every 3 night package comes with a FREE 10GB eSIM 📶 🌴 The Shalimar Hotel: $222.59 (save $137) 🌿 The Fern Residency Chembur: $404.42 (save $97) 🏙 Ramee Techome: $261.24 (save $42) 💳 Card, bank transfer or crypto 🪙 👉 Book now
❤2🤝1
Token’s wrapped, race weekend’s on, and half of you are probably extending your stay last minute 👀 Need another night, a flight home or something to do this weekend? Tell Staycie, book it the way you used to, or let a real person on our team sort it. Staynex is getting an upgrade. Keep your notifications on 🔔
❤3😱1
🔟🔟 The 10.10 Sale is coming! 10 + 10 = 20% OFF every booking on Sleap.io ✈️ Use code: 1010STAYNEX One day only: bookings made on Sat 10 Oct (00:00–23:59 SGT). Set your reminder. Your next trip just got cheaper 👇 👉 sleap.io
🔥4😘1
Christmas and NYE are closer than they look 🎄 Now's the time to get your trip booked, with an extra 25% off refundable stays on Sleap.io. Holding an NFT? You get an extra 5% on top. 👉 Book on Sleap
🔥2🤩1
Ever wanted to watch the night race from the Paddock? 🏁 Paddock access is open, three nights trackside at Marina Bay. Email our concierge to book yours: [email protected]
❤3👍1
Already thinking about your next trip? Sleap has an extra 25% off refundable stays with check in from 1 November, with free cancellation if plans change. Sleap NFT holders get an extra 5% on top. Lock your November stay 👉 sleap.io
🔥2❤1
Landing tomorrow? Here's your 2049 week checklist 🇸🇬 🛏 Room near the venue 📶 eSIM so you're online the moment you land 🥂 Lounge access before your flight in 🪙 All paid in crypto Missing one? Sort it all in one place 👉 2049.xyz
👍1
One week to TOKEN2049 🇸🇬 If your eSIM isn't sorted, it's three steps. See the image. Two things left after that: where you're staying, and which side events are actually worth your time. Ask Staycie and she'll shortlist them by day. 🏝 Book US$500 or more on the Fizen x Staynex path and you're in the draw for a seven night resort stay. 🌐 2049.xyz/partner/fizen T&Cs apply
❤2
Staynex x IBT26 is official. We're the Official Travel Partner for the whole tour. One account for every city you're hitting, paid with the crypto you already hold. 👉 Start booking
❤3
Booking a trip this month? Pay for it in crypto and you could be watching the Singapore night race from the grandstand 🏁 Here's what's in the pool: 🏁 2 Grand Prix tickets, 9 to 11 Oct 🌴 3 RCI stays, 7 nights each ✈️ 5 DragonPass lounge passes USD 500 and up gets you one entry. Over USD 1,000 gets you two. Entries close 10 October. 👉 Book here T&Cs: staynex.io/conditions
🔥3❤1
🔈 TOKEN2049 Week · One Badge · One Card · One Less Thing to Think About ✉️ Spend your Gate balance with Gate Card wherever Visa is accepted, and get up to 8% cashback. $USDT, $BTC, $ETH, $GT. Apple Pay. Google Pay. No annual fee. 🗓 Staynex’s 2049.xyz is your guide to the week, with Gate as the Featured Crypto Card & Community Partner. Already rated 8.9/10 and named an Editor’s Top Pick, Gate Card is your way to spe…
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @staynexcomannouncement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@staynexcomannouncement named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@solanium_io · 64,574#1
@UTasksBlogENG · 1,242#2
@YOM_announcements · 2,085#3
@serenityshield_news · 1,649#4
@NeoCortexAI_Announcements · 2,061#5
@fairdotclub · 12,230#6
@seafi_announcements · 80,576#7
@finceptor_ann · 22,444#8
@nftbmarket · 3,611#9
@BullPerksAnnouncements · 10,965#10
@dogs · 6,475,477#11
@gram · 6,258,010#12
@walt_news · 3,305,990#13
@onus_globalchannel · 1,514,277#14
@trendingapps · 3,569,185#15
@catgoldminerann · 837,658#16
@daomaker_ann · 14,391#17
@pichifinance · 3,766#18
@galaxylabofficial · 47,665#19
@harmonix_announcement · 765#20
@wolvionx · 299#21
@ivpay_io · 6,530#22
@friend3group · 5,633#23
@rejuvenetwork · 467#24
@basketballverse_announcements · 8,592#25
@brightsetup · 93,882#26
@PolkastarterAnnounce · 16,890#27
@ListaDAO_Announcements · 2,691#28
@NuklaiNews · 548#29
@weegleCAT · 355#30
@erthagame · 7,055#31
@KIPprotocol_announcement · 14,396#32
@TgFastTrending · 904#33
@janibaseotc · 1,257#34
@SugarKingdomOfficialAnnounc · 10,403#35
@TrustSwapANN · 4,021#36
@linklayertechnology · 4,808#37
@WePad_Announcements · 7,981#38
@L8M5iQPkLr · 275#39
@arbipadnews · 2,418#40
@globalcrypto_club · 1,065#41
@CVALPHA_news · 52,871#42
@settleton · 7,809#43
@chaingptpad · 26,455#44
@MeonCoin · 113,224#45
@GoodGamesGuildAnn · 3,675#46
@PentagonGamesXPOfficial · 2,898#47
@ton_ventures · 1,363#48
@artyfactnews · 225,896#49
@PancakeSwapAnn · 28,256#50
@tontias · 2,877#51
@Tredingkingbd · 110#52
@EnginesOfFuryNews · 57,767#53
@blocktides · 779 (as read 21 August 2026)#54
@TONVitebsk · 81#55
@ASI_announcements · 4,327#56
@triangle_builders · 606#57
@Project_ZIFRETTA · 1,860#58
@TonPolandNews · 1,369#59
@toncishub · 29,793#60
@toneahub · 13,132#61
@baelsport · 3,660#62
@alignedlayer · 19,104#63
@fiva_protocol · 9,374#64
@toncoin_id · 188,863#65
@roletabrasileiradupoccreedz · 179#66
@Damina_tech · 27,329#67
@somedogsairdrop · 1,785#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@solanium_io · 64,574
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Staynex Announcement Channel” (@staynexcomannouncement), 57,186 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staynexcomannouncement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.