Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

книжная жаба

@booktoad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,479subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002192644664
TypeChannel
Username@booktoad
Descriptionоснова: https://t.me/dashakozlouskayatg сотрудничество: kozlovskaya@avtormedia.ru A+ Включен в перечень персональных страниц: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6786545f4de6c36845945e29
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/booktoad

Growth

38,47938,54738,5136 August 2026 — 38,547 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,542 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,532 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,527 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,513 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,509 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,497 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,479 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,469–38,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:3438,479-18
11 Aug 2026, 22:5238,497-12
11 Aug 2026, 00:2738,509-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:3238,513-14
8 Aug 2026, 21:1238,527-5
7 Aug 2026, 22:5338,532-10
7 Aug 2026, 01:3038,542-5
6 Aug 2026, 09:4838,547first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.84%
avg views ÷ 38,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,020
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total90,460
Reactions total2,531
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,490
Videos
15
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,531 reactions across 30 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
94137.2%
😁52720.8%
custom 577591621487428143149019.4%
❤‍🔥2519.92%
😭1003.95%
custom 5433927687288673602883.48%
🔥742.92%
🥰481.90%
😱90.356%
💩30.119%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,531reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,090 views234 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Я в каждой голосовалке, когда вижу «Господа головлевы»

😁17936custom 577591621487428143115😭4

12 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,340 views137 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Да блин😆 Бедные Головлевы

😁104😭276

12 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,490 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

ГОЛОСОВАЛКА: ЧТО ЧИТАЕМ ДАЛЬШЕ

  1. «Господа Головлевы» М.Салтыков-Щедрин39%
  2. «Сиддхартха» Г.Гессе16%
  3. «Бремя страстей человеческих» С.Моэм27%
  4. «Жизнь насекомых» В.Пелевин12%
  5. «Поющие в терновнике» К.Маккалоу34%
  6. Т.Драйзер «Сестра Керри»18%
  7. В.Набоков «Камера Обскура»22%

The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😭27🔥17custom 57759162148742814318❤‍🔥73custom 54339276872886736022

12 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈2,720 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Не «жестко оскуфел», а….. рубрика интеллигенты

😁4812🥰4

11 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈2,950 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

рубрика сленг

33custom 577591621487428143110custom 54339276872886736027

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,850 views106 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ТЕСТ НА ЗНАНИЕ «МАРТИНА ИДЕНА» Д.ЛОНДОНА Правила участия и условия победы в картинках Я начну: Как зовут друга Мартина, через которого он впервые попадает в дом семьи Морзов? Артур Морз Знали - ❤️ Не знали - ❤️‍🔥 Знала, кайфовый вопрос - ❤️‍🔥 —- результаты в понедельник

79❤‍🔥25🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,740 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Voice message

Финальные мысли по «Мартину Идену», которые забираю с собой Супервкратце: Талант=одиночество и мотив Скорби и Сатаны. Жду ваши в комменты!

49custom 577591621487428143121🥰7custom 54339276872886736022

11 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,730 views155 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Закончили «Мартина Идена»! Прочитали/не прочитали? 👍/🌟 Давайте финально обсуждать, кто какие мысли уносит с собой после прочтения

custom 5775916214874281431113custom 543392768728867360235❤‍🔥52

11 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈10,600 views75 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Не «х👍й с горы», а….. рубрика интеллигенты

😁50❤‍🔥167custom 57759162148742814312

10 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈3,420 views167 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Дропаю вам варианты, что читаем дальше, свои предлагайте в комменты, из них мы не раз брали то, что в итоге читали! А завтра финально обсуждаем «Мартина Идена»

110❤‍🔥34🔥23

9 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈3,470 views154 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Жабки, голосованием решено дочитать Мартина Идеана на выходных И обсуждаем вечером во вторник! 📖

❤‍🔥81😭4212custom 543392768728867360212custom 57759162148742814314💩3

7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,730 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не «шаро👍биться», а….. рубрика интеллигенты

53❤‍🔥8🥰6

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @booktoad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTCAnonymous Poll1,360 voters approx.

ГОЛОСОВАЛКА: ЧТО ЧИТАЕМ ДАЛЬШЕ

  1. «Господа Головлевы» М.Салтыков-Щедрин39%
  2. «Сиддхартха» Г.Гессе16%
  3. «Бремя страстей человеческих» С.Моэм27%
  4. «Жизнь насекомых» В.Пелевин12%
  5. «Поющие в терновнике» К.Маккалоу34%
  6. Т.Драйзер «Сестра Керри»18%
  7. В.Набоков «Камера Обскура»22%

The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTCFinal Results296 voters

Может добьем Мартина Идена на выходных и в понедельник финально обсудим?

  1. Давай, я за61%
  2. Не успеваю, хочу по расписанию39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,877 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Даша Козловская
@dashakozlouskayatg · 137,719
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“книжная жаба” (@booktoad), 38,479 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booktoad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.