№ 5680381517
Разборы средств по составу, статьи про уход за волосами ищи В ЗАКРЕПЛЁННЫХ
Мой Инстаграм https://instagram.com/vaksksik?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Сниховская Дарья Николаевна
ИНН 77251163
ВИП ведение — от 30 000 ₽
Алгоритмы ухода — 4 000 ₽
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net -984. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,507–63,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Oct 2026, 09:38
62,655
-24
12 Oct 2026, 19:29
62,679
-69
8 Oct 2026, 08:57
62,748
-116
3 Oct 2026, 20:19
62,864
-63
25 Sept 2026, 04:20
62,927
-81
18 Sept 2026, 22:39
63,008
-74
16 Sept 2026, 12:39
63,082
-60
14 Sept 2026, 19:21
63,142
-90
13 Sept 2026, 07:39
63,232
-21
11 Sept 2026, 10:20
63,253
+13
8 Sept 2026, 18:38
63,240
-5
5 Sept 2026, 11:37
63,245
-5
3 Sept 2026, 15:38
63,250
+99
2 Sept 2026, 05:18
63,151
+5
1 Sept 2026, 05:26
63,146
-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:22
63,150
-22
30 Aug 2026, 07:04
63,172
-25
29 Aug 2026, 07:53
63,197
-35
28 Aug 2026, 08:38
63,232
-17
27 Aug 2026, 09:04
63,249
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.45%
avg views ÷ 62,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held
53 (30 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total
107,330
Reactions total
3,655
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈448
Links
≈304
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,922 reactions across 53 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,598
76.6%
🔥
1,196
12.1%
😁
360
3.63%
🤓
316
3.18%
😍
148
1.49%
💋
130
1.31%
🏆
56
0.564%
🙏
56
0.564%
💯
39
0.393%
😱
17
0.171%
🍾
6
0.06%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,922 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 53 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vaksiktyt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
КАК УХАЖИВАТЬ ЗА ВОЛОСАМИ ПОСЛЕ КЕРАТИНА? 🧴
Я представляю какой кайф у вас сразу после процедуры - волосы гладкие, блестящие, пушение ушло, и кажется, что теперь и с уходом можно особо не заморачиваться))
Нооо, мы же с вами знаем, что кератин работает лишь на визуал, а после химического и температурного воздействия длине все еще нужен уход, даже если она выглядит прекрасно
Поэтом, после процедуры останется 2 задач…
ПОЧЕМУ Я ДАЖЕ ХОРОШУЮ ФОРМУЛУ ОТПРАВЛЯЮ НА ДОРАБОТКУ? 😂👇🏻
Сейчас как раз тестирую образцы своего бренда косметики:
Недавно вам показывала липидную маску и крем
А сегодня речь пойдет про маску-реконструктор и увлажняющий спрей
И на них хорошо видно, почему я столько говорю про сочетание активов👩🔬
🧴С РЕКОНСТРУКТОРОМ ПОЛУЧИЛАСЬ ТАКАЯ ИСТОРИЯ
По набору компонентов и насыщенности формула меня полностью устраивает
Н…
ПОЧЕМУ ПОСЛЕ МАСКИ С «БОГАТЫМ СОСТАВОМ» ВОЛОСЫ МОГУТ ВЫГЛЯДЕТЬ ХУЖЕ? 👀
Читайте картинки к посту 👩🎓
Можно купить средство с маслами, протеинами и увлажнителями, а после сушки получить тяжелые пряди или жесткие концы. Хотя состав вроде бы замечательный 🤙
Как так? Все эти компоненты нужны для ухода, но больше активов не означает лучше для ваших волос
Важны их сочетание, количество средства и состояние длины
В кару…
КАК ПОДОБРАТЬ ТЕМПЕРАТУРУ УТЮЖКА ПОД СВОИ ВОЛОСЫ? 🙁
Сразу скажу, что одной температуры, которая подойдет всем, нет 🥲
Одним волосам достаточно невысокого нагрева, а другие на том же режиме почти не выпрямляются, но это не повод сразу выкручивать максимум или бесконечно водить утюжком по одной пряди 😐
Поэтому смотрим не только на цифру на утюжке, но и на то, хватает ли этой температуры именно вашим волосам
Давайте …
Девочки, пользуетесь утюжком? 🤔
Как выбираете температуру под свои волосы или просто нашли режим, на котором все выпрямляется и уже бог с ней, с этой температурой?))
Ставлю минимальную, боюсь повредить14%
Подобрала температуру под свои волосы7%
Добавляю, пока не начнет выпрямлять 😅7%
Даже не знаю, сколько там градусов5%
Не пользуюсь утюжком68%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
СЫВОРОТКИ ДЛЯ РОСТА ВОЛОС - РАБОТАЮТ ИЛИ ДЕНЬГИ НА ВЕТЕР? 👀
Девчонки, у нас на обучении «Волосы твоей мечты» часто спрашивают про сыворотки для роста волос - работают они или нет? Обязательно ли ими пользоваться, если хочется отрастить длину?
И я понимаю, почему возникает этот вопрос - нам обещают рост активируется, и выпадение сокращается, и волосы становятся гуще. Хочется взять сразу две 🤙
Но давайте посмотрим, …
Я ПОДСТРИГЛАСЬ. НО ГЛАВНАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА ТАК И НЕ РЕШИЛАСЬ 😂
В общем, я пошла стричь кончики! Впервые за полгода))
И повод у меня был серьезный. Волосы уже полностью закрывали попу, и в какой-то момент возник закономерный вопрос…
ЗАЧЕМ Я ЕЕ КАЧАЮ, ЕСЛИ ЕЕ ВСЕ РАВНО НЕ ВИДНО? 😂
Решила, что пора убирать длину. Подстригли, смотрю на результат и понимаю - как будто маловато
Попу все еще закрывают, волосы все еще кажутся …
КАК СДЕЛАТЬ ВОЛОСЫ ВИЗУАЛЬНО ГУЩЕ, ЕСЛИ ОТ ПРИРОДЫ ИХ НЕМНОГО?
Часть 2
1️⃣ Увлажняем обезвоженную длину
Если волосы обезвожены, они могут терять в объеме
При увлажнении кортекс, внутренняя часть волоса, поглощает воду и набухает, поэтому волос становится толще на ощупь и визуально
➡️ Для этого можно использовать либо комплексное средство, либо средство, направленное преимущественно на увлажнение + (можно) закрыть…
КАК СДЕЛАТЬ ВОЛОСЫ ВИЗУАЛЬНО ГУЩЕ, ЕСЛИ ОТ ПРИРОДЫ ИХ НЕМНОГО?
Часть 1
Когда волосы от природы негустые, к уходу особый запрос, хочется и мягкую, гладкую длину, и сохранить объем 😅
Но тут легко попасть в ловушку, добавляешь уход для мягкости и гладкости, а волосы утяжеляются, собираются в отдельные пряди и выглядят еще реже 🫠
И что теперь, выбирать между ухоженной длиной и объемом? 😐
С помощью ухода можно добавит…
С ЧЕГО НАЧАТЬ УХОД ЗА ВОЛОСАМИ? 🧴
Пошаговый план на первую неделю
Девочки, у меня в блоге много информации про увлажнение, липиды, маски, несмывашки…
Но как собрать все это воедино? Что нужно именно вашим волосам, с чего начинать и что добавлять потом? 😅
PS. Вставила вам ссылки на более подробные полезные посты по темам 🤫
Давайте разложу по этапам 👇🏻
1️⃣ СНАЧАЛА РАЗБИРАЕМСЯ С ВОЛОСАМИ
До покупок отмечаем:
🤎Тол…
ПОЛЬЗУ ЗАБИРАЕМ, А РЕАКЦИИ ЖОПИМ? 😂👌
Девочки, теперь объясню, почему вообще появился этот опрос))
Я вижу, что под постами не так много реакций и у меня возник вопрос - может вы не успеваете читать контент, либо вам не интересно? 👀
Я сейчас специально делаю посты более практическими - с примерами средств, что кому пробовать, как наносить и что менять
Вкладываюсь в эти материалы, чтобы вы могли применять их в своем…
❤375💋49🔥34😁9😍5🍾3🙏3🏆2
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @vaksiktyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vaksiktyt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Девочки, пользуетесь утюжком? 🤔
Как выбираете температуру под свои волосы или просто нашли режим, на котором все выпрямляется и уже бог с ней, с этой температурой?))
Ставлю минимальную, боюсь повредить14%
Подобрала температуру под свои волосы7%
Добавляю, пока не начнет выпрямлять 😅7%
Даже не знаю, сколько там градусов5%
Не пользуюсь утюжком68%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Уход за волосами - MVBEAUTYHAIR @mvbeautyhair · 9,397#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Екатерина Гребенко @kategrebenko · 26,327 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Парикмахер вещает @push_dish @DianaPushkova · 30,595 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
NATALIA BBOS @facebbos · 20,474 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Katyaspivak @spivakkatyaa · 28,586 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Territory for girls🧚🏻♂️ @diana_mood7 · 38,311 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 7 September 2026
ТОЛЬКО (НЕ) НА ЛИЦО @kravtz_cosmetology · 32,293 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼♀️” (@vaksiktyt), 62,655 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaksiktyt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.