Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼‍♀️

Channel

Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼‍♀️

@vaksiktyt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,655subscribers

-984 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263708048
TypeChannel
Username@vaksiktyt
Description№ 5680381517 Разборы средств по составу, статьи про уход за волосами ищи В ЗАКРЕПЛЁННЫХ Мой Инстаграм https://instagram.com/vaksksik?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= Сниховская Дарья Николаевна ИНН 77251163 ВИП ведение — от 30 000 ₽ Алгоритмы ухода — 4 000 ₽
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held38
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/vaksiktyt

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

62,65563,63963,1477 August 2026 — 63,639 subscribers8 August 2026 — 63,628 subscribers9 August 2026 — 63,584 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63,560 subscribers11 August 2026 — 63,580 subscribers12 August 2026 — 63,604 subscribers13 August 2026 — 63,583 subscribers14 August 2026 — 63,578 subscribers15 August 2026 — 63,551 subscribers16 August 2026 — 63,530 subscribers18 August 2026 — 63,497 subscribers19 August 2026 — 63,444 subscribers20 August 2026 — 63,394 subscribers21 August 2026 — 63,378 subscribers22 August 2026 — 63,375 subscribers24 August 2026 — 63,342 subscribers25 August 2026 — 63,308 subscribers26 August 2026 — 63,273 subscribers27 August 2026 — 63,249 subscribers28 August 2026 — 63,232 subscribers29 August 2026 — 63,197 subscribers30 August 2026 — 63,172 subscribers31 August 2026 — 63,150 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,146 subscribers2 September 2026 — 63,151 subscribers3 September 2026 — 63,250 subscribers5 September 2026 — 63,245 subscribers8 September 2026 — 63,240 subscribers11 September 2026 — 63,253 subscribers13 September 2026 — 63,232 subscribers14 September 2026 — 63,142 subscribers16 September 2026 — 63,082 subscribers18 September 2026 — 63,008 subscribers25 September 2026 — 62,927 subscribers3 October 2026 — 62,864 subscribers8 October 2026 — 62,748 subscribers12 October 2026 — 62,679 subscribers14 October 2026 — 62,655 subscribers7 August 202614 October 2026
38 measurements spanning 68 days, net -984. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,507–63,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 09:3862,655-24
12 Oct 2026, 19:2962,679-69
8 Oct 2026, 08:5762,748-116
3 Oct 2026, 20:1962,864-63
25 Sept 2026, 04:2062,927-81
18 Sept 2026, 22:3963,008-74
16 Sept 2026, 12:3963,082-60
14 Sept 2026, 19:2163,142-90
13 Sept 2026, 07:3963,232-21
11 Sept 2026, 10:2063,253+13
8 Sept 2026, 18:3863,240-5
5 Sept 2026, 11:3763,245-5
3 Sept 2026, 15:3863,250+99
2 Sept 2026, 05:1863,151+5
1 Sept 2026, 05:2663,146-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:2263,150-22
30 Aug 2026, 07:0463,172-25
29 Aug 2026, 07:5363,197-35
28 Aug 2026, 08:3863,232-17
27 Aug 2026, 09:0463,249first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.45%
avg views ÷ 62,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held53 (30 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total107,330
Reactions total3,655
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈448
Links
≈304

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,922 reactions across 53 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,59876.6%
🔥1,19612.1%
😁3603.63%
🤓3163.18%
😍1481.49%
💋1301.31%
🏆560.564%
🙏560.564%
💯390.393%
😱170.171%
🍾60.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,922 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 53 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vaksiktyt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 16:50 UTC≈3,100 views154 reactionsread 14 October 2026

КАК УХАЖИВАТЬ ЗА ВОЛОСАМИ ПОСЛЕ КЕРАТИНА? 🧴 Я представляю какой кайф у вас сразу после процедуры - волосы гладкие, блестящие, пушение ушло, и кажется, что теперь и с уходом можно особо не заморачиваться)) Нооо, мы же с вами знаем, что кератин работает лишь на визуал, а после химического и температурного воздействия длине все еще нужен уход, даже если она выглядит прекрасно Поэтом, после процедуры останется 2 задач…

❤141💯5🔥3😁2💋1😍1🙏1

10 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC≈3,650 views157 reactions1 Starread 14 October 2026
Video

ПОЧЕМУ Я ДАЖЕ ХОРОШУЮ ФОРМУЛУ ОТПРАВЛЯЮ НА ДОРАБОТКУ? 😂👇🏻 Сейчас как раз тестирую образцы своего бренда косметики: Недавно вам показывала липидную маску и крем А сегодня речь пойдет про маску-реконструктор и увлажняющий спрей И на них хорошо видно, почему я столько говорю про сочетание активов👩‍🔬 🧴С РЕКОНСТРУКТОРОМ ПОЛУЧИЛАСЬ ТАКАЯ ИСТОРИЯ По набору компонентов и насыщенности формула меня полностью устраивает Н…

❤136💋11😍6🏆4

10 Oct 2026, 13:13 UTC≈3,130 views72 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

ПОЧЕМУ ПОСЛЕ МАСКИ С «БОГАТЫМ СОСТАВОМ» ВОЛОСЫ МОГУТ ВЫГЛЯДЕТЬ ХУЖЕ? 👀 Читайте картинки к посту 👩‍🎓 Можно купить средство с маслами, протеинами и увлажнителями, а после сушки получить тяжелые пряди или жесткие концы. Хотя состав вроде бы замечательный 🤙 Как так? Все эти компоненты нужны для ухода, но больше активов не означает лучше для ваших волос Важны их сочетание, количество средства и состояние длины В кару…

❤65🔥4😍3

8 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈4,280 views84 reactionsread 14 October 2026

КАК ПОДОБРАТЬ ТЕМПЕРАТУРУ УТЮЖКА ПОД СВОИ ВОЛОСЫ? 🙁 Сразу скажу, что одной температуры, которая подойдет всем, нет 🥲 Одним волосам достаточно невысокого нагрева, а другие на том же режиме почти не выпрямляются, но это не повод сразу выкручивать максимум или бесконечно водить утюжком по одной пряди 😐 Поэтому смотрим не только на цифру на утюжке, но и на то, хватает ли этой температуры именно вашим волосам Давайте …

❤79💯3💋2

8 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈3,660 views26 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Poll

Девочки, пользуетесь утюжком? 🤔 Как выбираете температуру под свои волосы или просто нашли режим, на котором все выпрямляется и уже бог с ней, с этой температурой?))

  1. Ставлю минимальную, боюсь повредить14%
  2. Подобрала температуру под свои волосы7%
  3. Добавляю, пока не начнет выпрямлять 😅7%
  4. Даже не знаю, сколько там градусов5%
  5. Не пользуюсь утюжком68%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥13❤8💋5

7 Oct 2026, 16:45 UTC≈4,840 views206 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

СЫВОРОТКИ ДЛЯ РОСТА ВОЛОС - РАБОТАЮТ ИЛИ ДЕНЬГИ НА ВЕТЕР? 👀 Девчонки, у нас на обучении «Волосы твоей мечты» часто спрашивают про сыворотки для роста волос - работают они или нет? Обязательно ли ими пользоваться, если хочется отрастить длину? И я понимаю, почему возникает этот вопрос - нам обещают рост активируется, и выпадение сокращается, и волосы становятся гуще. Хочется взять сразу две 🤙 Но давайте посмотрим, …

❤122🤓48😁30💋6

1 Oct 2026, 13:58 UTC≈7,220 views401 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Я ПОДСТРИГЛАСЬ. НО ГЛАВНАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА ТАК И НЕ РЕШИЛАСЬ 😂 В общем, я пошла стричь кончики! Впервые за полгода)) И повод у меня был серьезный. Волосы уже полностью закрывали попу, и в какой-то момент возник закономерный вопрос… ЗАЧЕМ Я ЕЕ КАЧАЮ, ЕСЛИ ЕЕ ВСЕ РАВНО НЕ ВИДНО? 😂 Решила, что пора убирать длину. Подстригли, смотрю на результат и понимаю - как будто маловато Попу все еще закрывают, волосы все еще кажутся …

😁252❤141🔥8

1 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC≈5,850 views27 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤20😍6💋1

30 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈6,290 views228 reactions1 Starread 14 October 2026

КАК СДЕЛАТЬ ВОЛОСЫ ВИЗУАЛЬНО ГУЩЕ, ЕСЛИ ОТ ПРИРОДЫ ИХ НЕМНОГО? Часть 2 1️⃣ Увлажняем обезвоженную длину Если волосы обезвожены, они могут терять в объеме При увлажнении кортекс, внутренняя часть волоса, поглощает воду и набухает, поэтому волос становится толще на ощупь и визуально ➡️ Для этого можно использовать либо комплексное средство, либо средство, направленное преимущественно на увлажнение + (можно) закрыть…

❤184🔥30💋11🙏3

30 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈5,500 views130 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

КАК СДЕЛАТЬ ВОЛОСЫ ВИЗУАЛЬНО ГУЩЕ, ЕСЛИ ОТ ПРИРОДЫ ИХ НЕМНОГО? Часть 1 Когда волосы от природы негустые, к уходу особый запрос, хочется и мягкую, гладкую длину, и сохранить объем 😅 Но тут легко попасть в ловушку, добавляешь уход для мягкости и гладкости, а волосы утяжеляются, собираются в отдельные пряди и выглядят еще реже 🫠 И что теперь, выбирать между ухоженной длиной и объемом? 😐 С помощью ухода можно добавит…

❤103🔥18😍7💋1😁1

29 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC≈7,250 views468 reactionsread 14 October 2026

С ЧЕГО НАЧАТЬ УХОД ЗА ВОЛОСАМИ? 🧴 Пошаговый план на первую неделю Девочки, у меня в блоге много информации про увлажнение, липиды, маски, несмывашки… Но как собрать все это воедино? Что нужно именно вашим волосам, с чего начинать и что добавлять потом? 😅 PS. Вставила вам ссылки на более подробные полезные посты по темам 🤫 Давайте разложу по этапам 👇🏻 1️⃣ СНАЧАЛА РАЗБИРАЕМСЯ С ВОЛОСАМИ До покупок отмечаем: 🤎Тол…

❤383🔥58💯18💋6😍2🙏1

28 Sept 2026, 18:34 UTC≈5,610 views483 reactions1 Starread 12 October 2026

ПОЛЬЗУ ЗАБИРАЕМ, А РЕАКЦИИ ЖОПИМ? 😂👌 Девочки, теперь объясню, почему вообще появился этот опрос)) Я вижу, что под постами не так много реакций и у меня возник вопрос - может вы не успеваете читать контент, либо вам не интересно? 👀 Я сейчас специально делаю посты более практическими - с примерами средств, что кому пробовать, как наносить и что менять Вкладываюсь в эти материалы, чтобы вы могли применять их в своем…

❤375💋49🔥34😁9😍5🍾3🙏3🏆2

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @vaksiktyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vaksiktyt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTCAnonymous Poll731 voters

Девочки, пользуетесь утюжком? 🤔 Как выбираете температуру под свои волосы или просто нашли режим, на котором все выпрямляется и уже бог с ней, с этой температурой?))

  1. Ставлю минимальную, боюсь повредить14%
  2. Подобрала температуру под свои волосы7%
  3. Добавляю, пока не начнет выпрямлять 😅7%
  4. Даже не знаю, сколько там градусов5%
  5. Не пользуюсь утюжком68%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTCAnonymous Poll882 voters

Девочки, вы успеваете читать мой канал? Не много ли вам контента? 👀

  1. Успеваю, давай еще 🔥32%
  2. Читаю выборочно, темп устраивает 👌🏻35%
  3. Не успеваю, можно чуть реже 🫠33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTCAnonymous Poll1,190 voters approx.

В чем может быть причина? 🤔

  1. 🧴 Уход слишком тяжелый для таких волос20%
  2. 💧 Средство неравномерно распределили12%
  3. 🔍 Разные участки волос требуют разного ухода29%
  4. 🤯 Могут совпасть несколько причин39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Уход за волосами - MVBEAUTYHAIR
@mvbeautyhair · 9,397
#1
Волосы и уход за ними @pavlova_beauty_blog
@pavlova_beauty_blog1 · 4,743
#2
TSARSKAYA.K 🌙 | Екатерина Царская
@ktsarskaya · 85,286
#3
Glow up with Masha 💋
@roskoshvolosi · 6,131
#4
Парикмахер вещает @push_dish
@DianaPushkova · 30,595
#5
Екатерина Гребенко
@kategrebenko · 26,327
#6
Territory for girls🧚🏻‍♂️
@diana_mood7 · 38,311
#7
Трихолог Копытина Виталия
@VitaKopytina · 13,490
#8
Lera – hair girl ✨
@hair_girl · 2,008
#9
Волосатая тема 🧬
@tataris · 11,509
#10
𝚇𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚊 𝙿𝚛𝚘 𝙷𝚊𝚒𝚛
@keratinbabe · 3,029
#11
KRISSKIN про уход
@krisskin_skincare · 5,988
#12
Бьюти суета
@klavagolman · 51,395
#13
NATALIA BBOS
@facebbos · 20,474
#14
Katyaspivak
@spivakkatyaa · 28,586
#15
ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝
@sem_skin · 12,601
#16
Елагина про уход
@alina_elaginatg · 858
#17
with yereko
@withyereko · 40,523
#18
By Mariaaaaaa_p Blog New
@bymariaaaaaa_pblog · 19,846
#19
симоны гулимоны
@simoni_gulimonii · 8,193
#20
Крис печатает...
@krisistyping · 52,355
#21
Koroleva_Daily
@katekorolevaaa · 5,431
#22
Лизочка любимая подружка 💞✨
@myastrologer · 77,655
#23
Уходом по лицу
@uhodovface · 8,862
#24
Kristina Laktionova
@laktionovaaaaa · 53,262
#25
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,395,314
#26
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 118,123
#27
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,649,235
#28
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 749,805
#29
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 404,199
#30
rutkismary
@rutkismary · 331,786
#31
Даша Козловская
@dashakozlouskayatg · 134,301
#32
KOSTI
@kosti · 558,534
#33
Записки косметического трихолога
@ks_prohair · 4,387
#34
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 102,309
#35
Волосотека 📚
@volosoteka · 2,866
#36
Alexandra Posnova
@posnovaalexandra · 201,766
#37
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 156,846
#38
Katya Golden
@katya_golden · 107,903
#39
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 487,158
#40
Polikova Beauty|Юлия Полякова
@polikova_beauty · 7,981
#41
Твоя Эрия
@youreriaa · 4,704
#42
Проект Шмеля - Катя Конасова
@proektshmel · 121,513
#43
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода
@vrednayamoda · 188,189
#44
жизнь ventus__florem
@ventusfloremlife · 85,594
#45
more_science_inbeauty
@cosmeticsinsider · 4,885
#46
Мне только кончики
@kkkmarya · 24,060
#47
Катя Конасова
@konasovatut · 78,193
#48
PERVICERY
@briusvictoria · 198,666
#49
МАША.СТОРИЗ
@mashastories1 · 118,300
#50
Elena Bogdanovich
@bogdanovich_elena · 117,413
#51
UMKA
@umkatgk · 51,731
#52
Sasha Burimova
@burimovasasha · 80,993
#53
KSENIA CALM 🤍
@kseniacalm · 73,124
#54
KOSMO_WOMAN
@kosmo_woman22 · 70,679
#55
крис про сияние
@krisbeautynews · 53,993
#56
Сабина Филина | Домашние тренировки
@sabintag · 68,244
#57
Nioly, ты как?
@Polly_nioly · 168,252
#58
NADIN NADIN
@NADIN_NADINEE · 248,817
#59
Lab.Vera
@beauty_blogers · 53,536
#60
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 54,910
#61
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,624,261
#62
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,176,210
#63
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 573,730
#64
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 577,278
#65
MUR
@fashion_mur · 207,001
#66
Дневник путешественницы
@kseniamellie · 147,675
#67
pollinasha🍒
@pollinasha_reserve · 52,764
#68
Анна Протасова
@reiraofficial · 98,972
#69
книжная жаба
@booktoad · 38,221
#70

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Екатерина Гребенко
@kategrebenko · 26,327
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 15 September 2026
Парикмахер вещает @push_dish
@DianaPushkova · 30,595
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
NATALIA BBOS
@facebbos · 20,474
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Katyaspivak
@spivakkatyaa · 28,586
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Territory for girls🧚🏻‍♂️
@diana_mood7 · 38,311
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 7 September 2026
ТОЛЬКО (НЕ) НА ЛИЦО
@kravtz_cosmetology · 32,293
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ваксик — главная по волосам 💆🏼‍♀️” (@vaksiktyt), 62,655 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaksiktyt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.