Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Петуха спросить забыли

@rooster_speaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348940656
TypeChannel
Username@rooster_speaks
DescriptionМнение петуха — обо всем на свете
Created14 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rooster_speaks

Growth

186 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:0218no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:2818first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 October 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
2
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

18 Dec 2019, 09:48 UTC616 viewsread 11 August 2026

Эдуард Исмаил-Оглы Багиров поздравляет свою новую телку с днем рожлдения https://t.me/karaulny/189407

12 Dec 2019, 15:34 UTC604 viewsread 11 August 2026

«Что думаю по делу nginx». — Леонид Волков @Leonid_volkov ПЕТУХА НЕ СПРОСИЛИ, ЧТО ОН ТАМ ДУМАЕТ

6 Dec 2019, 10:15 UTC539 viewsread 11 August 2026

«Я б ей вдул, прости господи». Эдуард Багиров (@karaulny), об Изабелле Нильссон Ярванди, шведской активистке, называющей себя потомком викингов. Эдуард Исмаил Оглы, если она вам и даст, то разве топором промеж глаз. Дававать вашим землякам для викинга — зашквар. Тор покарает.

9 Nov 2019, 08:36 UTC544 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я не профессор, у меня нет учёной степени, я далек от академической науки. Но все это не мешает мне судить о том, что сейчас происходит вокруг Гасана Гусейнова вообще и в Высшей школе экономики в частности Дмитрий Гудков @DmitryGudkov НЕ ПРОФЕССОР, ПОТОМУ ЧТО ХУЕСОР. И ДА, ОПЯТЬ ПЕТУХА НЕ СПРОСИЛИ.

7 Nov 2019, 11:45 UTC254 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @niemandswasser

Петуха спросить забыли https://t.me/NoodleRemoverPlus/1976

30 Oct 2019, 12:36 UTC≈4,380 viewsread 11 August 2026

Вообще не вкурил тем с ВБОНом и Гусейновым. Ужасно похоже на какое-то раскачивание ксенофобии, например, к 4 ноября. АЛЕКСАНДР ПЛЮЩЕВ @PlushevChannel ПЕТУХА СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ! ХОТЯ БИЛЕТ ДО ТЕЛЬ-АВИВА НА ВСЯКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ ВОЗЬМИТЕ.

27 Oct 2019, 07:01 UTC522 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пересмотрел вчерашнее нашумевшее видео стендапа из серии #янелох. В результате: стыд за президента и гордость за добровольца. Олег Сенцов ПЕТУХА, ОЛЕЖА, СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ ПРО ЕГО ГОРДОСТЬ.

23 Oct 2019, 09:43 UTC509 viewsread 11 August 2026

Все эти сраные мартышки реально ведь припрутся к нам на Девятое мая. Придётся строить отдельный вольер. Эдуард Багиров, @karaulny ЭДВАРД, А ВЫ В ЗЕРКАЛО ДАВНО НА СЕБЯ СМОТРЕЛИ? ЧО ТАМ ПОКАЗЫВАЮТ?

21 Oct 2019, 17:46 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 11 August 2026

Да, Ассанжа, конечно, держать в тюрме не надо, хоть он и токсичный душнила. Алексей Ковалев @NoodleRemoverPlus ПЕТУХА СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ. А ТАКЖЕ — В ШТАНАХ У ТЕБЯ ДУШНИЛА.

17 Oct 2019, 11:00 UTC446 viewsread 11 August 2026

Валерий Фадеев может сменить Михаила Федотова на посту председателя Совета по правам человека. И это правильно. Какие права - таков и председатель. А лучше бы Александр Бастрыкин. Честнее и эффективнее Алексей Венедиктов @aavst ПЕТУХА СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ. ПРЕСТАРЕЛОГО.

10 Oct 2019, 10:47 UTC429 viewsread 11 August 2026

Давайте сейчас всей мужской Россией начнём ебаться в очко и требовать за это преференций. Да вы, блядь, ебанулись там все, что ли? @karaulny ОХ ЭДИК... ОПЯТЬ НЕ СПРОСИЛИ

9 Oct 2019, 08:55 UTC418 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Зачем мы живем? НУ ВЫ ПОНЯЛИ, ВЛАДИМИР РУДОЛЬФОВИЧ, КОГО СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ НА ЭТОТ РАЗ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rooster_speaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Oct 2019, 07:43 UTCFinal Results131 voters

ПЕТУХА СПРОСИТЬ ЗАБЫЛИ! А как вы считаете — кого нашего каналу надо спрашивать почаще?

  1. Пiвня Аркадия Бабченко зараз запитати!32%
  2. Алексей Ковалев, сниматель всей лапши с хуев8%
  3. Алексей Навальный, король всех, кого спросить забыли20%
  4. Веника давно не спрашивали13%
  5. Айдера Муждабаева! Как же мы без Маленького Мука?15%
  6. Плющева13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2019 to 18 December 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Петуха спросить забыли” (@rooster_speaks), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rooster_speaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.