Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SergeiMedvedev

Channel

SergeiMedvedev

@SergeiMedvedevPublic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

8,200subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557101952
TypeChannel
Username@SergeiMedvedevPublic
DescriptionКанал Сергея Медведева
Created14 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SergeiMedvedevPublic

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,1528,2698,210.56 August 2026 — 8,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,254 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,257 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,256 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,250 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,244 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,234 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,237 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,229 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,269 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,267 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,253 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,235 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,236 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,201 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,185 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,171 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,169 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,164 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,152 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,176 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,178 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,200 subscribers8,2006 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,134–8,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 01:598,200+22
1 Nov 2026, 22:148,178+2
26 Oct 2026, 03:478,176+24
22 Oct 2026, 19:018,152-12
19 Oct 2026, 06:008,164-5
16 Oct 2026, 03:068,169-2
13 Oct 2026, 05:488,171-14
7 Oct 2026, 04:418,185-16
30 Sept 2026, 06:008,201-35
16 Sept 2026, 02:378,236+1
12 Sept 2026, 08:018,235-18
7 Sept 2026, 17:178,253-14
2 Sept 2026, 18:168,267-2
30 Aug 2026, 18:558,269+40
27 Aug 2026, 22:388,229-8
24 Aug 2026, 17:438,237+3
20 Aug 2026, 22:548,234-10
18 Aug 2026, 07:238,244-6
15 Aug 2026, 11:188,250-6
11 Aug 2026, 19:368,256first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.3%
avg views ÷ 8,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,370
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held45 (10 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total34,950
Reactions total996
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
86
Videos
6
Links
483

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5,882 reactions across 45 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,91849.6%
❤1,25721.4%
🔥3716.31%
😢3596.10%
👏3005.10%
🤔1903.23%
😁1672.84%
🤬1171.99%
👎781.33%
😱270.459%
🤝270.459%
🤯200.34%
💔140.238%
😡110.187%
🥱110.187%
👌60.102%
🙏60.102%
❤‍🔥30.051%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,890 views48 reactionsread 7 November 2026

"Андрей Шарый: Это не первая волна общественных протестов в Сербии на моей памяти. Сейчас на улицы вышли дети тех, кто двадцать пять лет назад начал, но не доделал демократическое дело. Первые волны захлебнулись: система оказалась сильнее. В Сербии уже вроде бы устанавливалась более демократическая власть, но через десятилетие после Слободана Милошевича к власти пришёл его фактический наследник Александр Вучич. Посм…

👍35❤12👎1

3 Nov 2026, 16:54 UTC≈3,260 views223 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Справедливо пишет Dmitry Chernyshev -- это война обрушивает не только миф о "второй армии мира", но всю структуру российской державной мифологии, прежде всего связанную со Второй Мировой. То есть мифы о "солдатах-освободителях", конечно, остаются, но это уже пустые оболочки, которые продавать новым поколениям или внешним аудиториям будет все сложнее. Парадоксальным образом, Путин обнуляет не только конституцию, оппоз…

👍165❤32😢10🔥7👎6🤝3

1 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈3,680 views136 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Какие культурные в России пошли террористы. Готовили теракт не на Черкизовском рынке, не на Казанском вокзале, не на стадионе, не в торговом центре и даже не в попсовом Парке культуры, а в музее-заповеднике Царицыно, в холодный осенний день, среди опустевших аллей и зачехленных статуй. А сколько еще прекрасных мест для терактов найдется в столице -- заповедники Кусково, Коломенское, Узкое, сколько еще полков ОМОНа мо…

😁123👏7👎3🤯2🥱1

31 Oct 2026, 13:19 UTC≈4,200 views207 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В нашем доме всегда подписывались на газеты. Отец на интеллигентские "Известия" и "Литературку", бабушка на "вечерку" ("Вечернюю Москву", где в том числе публиковались номера погашенных облигаций сталинских займов), я, смешно сказать, на "Пионерку" ("Пионерскую правду" -- я долго был искренним пионером и комсомольцем). В перестройку остались "Известия" с потрясающим отделом экономики, появились яковлевские "Московски…

❤135👍48😢18👏4👎1🤔1

28 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC≈4,170 views56 reactionsread 7 November 2026

На одном гвозде, на одном гвозде, Мы построили державу на одном гвозде! На гвозде к звезде, мы рулим везде, Старый конь наш бредет До сих пор борозде Фантастический новый Fertoke к Хэллоиуну и не только. Кол и мочало, Путин и Пригожин, ОМОН и Арканар, Бондарчук и Богомолов, Михалков и Гергиев, Вышинский и Землячка -- смотреть и пересматривать, находя цитаты и аллюзии. Отдельный шок -- гигантская бутылка из-под шампа…

🔥29👍13❤10🤔2👏1😁1

25 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC≈5,200 views138 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Долгожданный разговор о "смертономике" с автором термина, а теперь и автором книги под тем же названием Владислав Иноземцев. Обложка огонь: фарш "русское мясо", дата упаковки -- февраль 2022го. масса 1,450,000 человек. По сути, "смертономика" это идеальный экономический и социальный механизм путинской России. Как говорит Владислав, в нем есть большая экономическая рациональность -- срезание навеса из лишних для экон…

👍91😢18❤9😁5👎3🥱3😱3👏2

12 Oct 2026, 12:35 UTC≈6,590 views124 reactionsread 7 November 2026

"Звягинцев создал самое масштабное на сегодня высказывание о России эпохи так называемой СВО. Вышедший годом ранее "Господин Никто против Путина" Павла Таланкина, получивший "Оскара", – фильм талантливый, но по жанру любительский, камерный, интимный. Здесь же мы видим беспощадную фреску страшного суда, попытку ответа русской культуры на катастрофу. И не случайны были десятиминутные овации на премьере в главном зале G…

❤64👍50👏5👎3🤔1🤝1

8 Oct 2026, 21:32 UTC≈5,960 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Сергей Медведев: Сможет ли АдГ сдвинуть немецкую политику в трёх направлениях - антимигрантском, антиевропейском и пророссийском? Дмитрий Стратиевский: Отчасти это уже произошло. Я бы не разделял эти направления на три чёткие области, но движение повестки вправо происходит уже не первый год. Одна из причин падения рейтинга Фридриха Мерца в том, что он попытался подражать АдГ: перенять её лозунги, немного смягчить их…

👍29❤18😢10🤔6👌1

1 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC≈5,890 views104 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Нечто очень похожее происходит сейчас в войне России и Запада. Есть страна-ревизионист и нарушитель, которая своей войной в Украине бросила вызов группе значительно более сильных стран: их совокупный экономический, технологический, военный потенциал в десятки раз выше российского. Однако их ограничивает эгоизм национальных интересов, нежелание брать риски, дефицит лидерства и неумение договориться. В итоге они пока п…

👍76🔥16❤5👏5🤔1🥱1

1 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC≈5,300 views57 reactionsread 7 November 2026

БЕССИЛИЕ ФАВОРИТОВ Сергей Медведев – о том, чем геополитика похожа на велоспорт В минувшие выходные Чемпионат мира по велоспорту в Канаде завершился групповой шоссейной гонкой на 273 километра по холмистому рельефу в Монреале. В отсутствие лидера сезона и лучшего гонщика мира Тадея Погачара, разбившегося месяц назад на испанской «Вуэльте» и досрочно завершившего сезон, гонка внезапно стала непредсказуемой, с 5-7 фа…

👍44❤7👏5😱1

30 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈4,710 views138 reactionsread 7 November 2026

ТК Пастухов о возможных форматах войны России против Европы. "Полгода назад я полагал, что наиболее реалистичным сценарием является гибридная война в формате рельсовой и дроновой войны. Сегодня моя позиция изменилась, и вторжение кажется мне достаточно вероятным сценарием. Но прежде, чем переходить к сути дела, позволю себе экскурс в историю Холодной войны. Когда Рейган пришел к власти, он решил пересмотреть страте…

👍58😢39❤27🤔9👎3👏2

28 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC≈4,260 views218 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Сегодня на записи эфира говорили с Peter Pomerantsev о том, почему так прочен образ России на Западе: "Россия никогда не проигрывает", Russia is too big to fail, "с Россией все равно придется договариваться" -- эти представления совершенно не коррелируют с положением дел на фронте, в тылу, в экономике, технологии, инфраструктуре. И я подумал, что все дело в балласте русской культуры (и истории), который никогда не д…

👍136👏24❤22🤔13😢9👎8🤬3😡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @SergeiMedvedevPublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KUCHER
@StanislavKucher · 30,798
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Boris Pastukhov
@b_pastukhov · 24,656
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
Романова
@oooromanova · 19,818
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
АДАГАМОВ
@adagamov_online · 27,154
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Альфред Кох
@AlfredKochBayern · 41,818
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Николай Травкин
@NTravkin · 25,083
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Andrey Malgin
@AndreyMalginItalia · 18,630
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Пархомбюро
@sparkhomenkovoice · 28,334
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q18245964 on Wikidata, read 1 November 2026
LabelSergei Medvedev
DescriptionRussian scholar

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SergeiMedvedev” (@SergeiMedvedevPublic), 8,200 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SergeiMedvedevPublic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.