https://x.com/tony_tress/status/2022659204105044394
❤35🤓5👏3

Channel
@avacoin_apps
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,297,410subscribers
-14,848 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002226623223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avacoin_apps |
| Description | Marketplace for mini apps |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avacoin_apps |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @avagoldcoin/6333 Jul 2025, 16:21 UTC | @avacoin_apps/63 · this entry3 Jul 2025, 16:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @avagoldcoin/65122 Jul 2025, 14:03 UTC | @avacoin_apps/66 · this entry22 Jul 2025, 14:03 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @avagoldcoin/67329 Sept 2025, 14:08 UTC | @avacoin_apps/69 · this entry29 Sept 2025, 14:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @avagoldcoin/68212 Oct 2025, 15:59 UTC | @avacoin_apps/71 · this entry12 Oct 2025, 16:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @avagoldcoin/7132 Nov 2025, 15:44 UTC | @avacoin_apps/73 · this entry2 Nov 2025, 15:45 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @avagoldcoin | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @avagoldcoin (14–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 June 2025 to 5 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @avacoin_apps — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 1,297,410 | -1,814 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 1,299,224 | -2,633 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 1,301,857 | -2,395 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 1,304,252 | -2,127 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 1,306,379 | -2,313 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,308,692 | -2,686 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 1,311,378 | -880 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 1,312,258 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
956 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 533 | 55.8% | |
| 🔥 | 169 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 11.2% | |
| 👏 | 60 | 6.28% | |
| 🤪 | 30 | 3.14% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 1.46% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.941% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.941% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 0.837% | |
| 🤓 | 5 | 0.523% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 0.418% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.314% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.209% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.105% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.105% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.105% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 956reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2025 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @avacoin_apps. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2025 to 18 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://x.com/tony_tress/status/2022659204105044394
❤35🤓5👏3
1 hour 🌕 $XP8 $XP
❤56👍17🔥14🌚1
We’ve already hit 10,000,000+ games in AVARUSH! And 200,000+ players! 🎉 Yeehaw! All roads lead to AVARUSH — are you among the top players?✨ http://t.me/avarushbot
❤33👍6🔥5😱2
Pss… the $XP listing is today! 🌕 It’s a powerful day — are you ready for the supermoooon? 👀 Listing goes live at 13:00 UTC in the XP8/USDT pair on MEXC: https://mexc.com/exchange/XP8_USDT?_from=search_spot_trade#token-info The token is built on TON https://tonviewer.com/EQAIK9sA6xo2mM1BybZcuBKbm1j5Ocu0jaeg__Lh7RJ_JuuG Are you in front of your screens? Are you with us? ⚡️
❤27🎉9🔥5
1 day left before the $XP listing. Stay tuned and keep your eyes on the screens. To be continued…🌕
👍10❤9🔥8🤩3🌚1🥰1
https://x.com/MEXC_Listings/status/1985633195820535906
🔥6❤3❤🔥1
🔔 MEXC New Listing ‣ #XP8 ‣ #XP8/USDT Trading: Nov 5, 2025, 13:00 (UTC) ‣ Deposit: Opened ‣ The #XP8 Airdrop+ campaign is heating up! Join to share 50,000 XP8! Join Airdrop+: https://www.mexc.com/token-airdrop/2970?utm_source=mexc&utm_medium=registerpageactivity&utm_campaign=XP8activity&utm_source=community&utm_medium=tg Download MEXC and Sign Up Download MEXC APP 🍏 Website 🌐 Join the MEXC Community Telegram ✈️ …
❤18🔥6👍2❤🔥1👏1😱1
🔥 YouTube Contest is ON! 🔥 Drop your Shorts straight on YouTube — make them wild, creative, and all about the $XP listing hype! 1️⃣ Use hashtags #xplabs #xp 2️⃣ Post as many as you want 3️⃣ Drop your video links in the comments 4️⃣ Repost this post! 💰 5 winners share $10,000 in tokens! Winners announced Nov 5 — right before the $XP listing!
❤16🔥10👍5👏3🥰2
🚨 The mascot naming contest is still on! Come up with the most original name and win 250 USDT! 👇💬 Drop your best name ideas: https://x.com/xplabsch/status/1984282122643722277
🔥16❤12👍4👏2🥰1
Time’s flying fr ⏳ Only 24 days left till the $XP listing! You still remember the airdrop conditions… right? 👉 https://t.me/xplabsch/127 Better start warming up — big things are coming 👀
🔥27❤24👍5👏5
tick-tock. u feel it yet?
❤41👍10👏7
🚨 $XP Token Listing in November! TGE is almost here — get ready! 👀 How to Join the XP Token Airdrop: 1️⃣ You MUST pay the annual Service Fee! – It's included with the purchase of any map from the SHOP (🏜Desert $20 or 🏔SkyLands $40). Buy a map and the Service Fee is automatically covered! 2️⃣ Create a NEW account & complete KYC on the exchange where the token will be listed (list of exchanges coming soon). Importa…
❤32👏23🤪18👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avacoin_apps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 797,977 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
9 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AVACOIN Apps” (@avacoin_apps), 1,297,410 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avacoin_apps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.