Channel
@holding_negin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
115,880subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001845627003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @holding_negin |
| Description | 👩🏻💻ارتباط با ما @Holding_neginn هر سوالی داشتی از پشتیبانی بپرس👇 @NeginMehrabi_support_bot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/holding_negin |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 115,880 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 115,880 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 81,214 |
| Reactions total | 1,432 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,432 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 830 | 58.0% | |
| 👍 | 277 | 19.3% | |
| 👀 | 176 | 12.3% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 3.00% | |
| 😎 | 27 | 1.89% | |
| 🙏 | 27 | 1.89% | |
| 😍 | 23 | 1.61% | |
| 🤓 | 8 | 0.559% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.489% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.349% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.279% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.07% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.07% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,432reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پرتکرارترین سوال در مورد طلا هست. پس از این فلز شروع می کنیم و روند کلی برای امسال بهتون ارائه بدم... ما از ریزش طلا و اون خبر و اتفاق بزرگ گفتیم، اما بعدش چی؟ به صورت کلی هر گرم طلا ۱۸ عیار امسال دو عدد 14 میلیون و 40 میلیون خواهد دید✅️ @holding_negin سایت مجموعه ما. حتما کلیک کن و ببین👇👇 neginmehrabi.com
❤7
صبح بخیر...❤️ ۲۴ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
❤41
الان یه نگاه به پیام ها کردم دیروز یکی نوشته بود چرا از بنزین چیزی نمیگم و ... به دو دلیل ۱_نه زمانی که گفتن بنزین شده لیتری ۷۸ تومن حرفی زدم و نه زمانی که گفتن فعلا اجرا نمیشه و کنسله...چرا؟ چون افزایش قیمت بنزین تا این حد باعث میشه اعتراضات خیابانی شروع بشه و از نظر چارت وقتش نیس. شما نظر منو در مورد شرایط بعد از جنگ و پاییز می دونین.. الان وقت شروع اعتراضات نیست. به همین دلیل وقتی هم نه در زمان خبر بنزین حرفی زدم…
❤105👍31🔥8
شماره تماس ازتون داریم با کارشناسان ما به صورت تلفتی در ارتباط باشین. اگر اینترنت قطع شد در دسترس هستیم🖐 اگر تا الان شماره تماس خودتو ثبت نکردی، همین الان برای ادمین ارسال کن ادمین @Holding_neginn
❤35👍7👀4
من گفتنیارو گفتم از روز اول جنگ گفتم که جنگ چجوری پیش میره. اول یه درگیری موقت، بعد صلح موقت و در نهایت جنگ اصلی تحلیلگرها میگن تا یک هفته آینده خبر میاد پول نقد کیف تجهیزات و آذوقه پاوربانک از خودتون مراقبت کنید آخر هفته خوبی داشته باشین🖐
❤66🙏14👍8🔥5👀3
ظاهرا بقیه همکارها یکی یکی دارن به این نتیجه میرسن که اوضاع خوب نیست...
❤23🔥9👍7🤩4
یک نکته مهم... امروز که در مینه مذاکرات هستیم، زنجریه کاملی از فرماندهان نظامی تغییر کرد ستاد کل با قرارگاه خاتم ادغام شد همزمان اسماعیل قاآنی به عراق رفت نظر من: این نشون میده که واقعا هیچ مذاکره ای در کار نیست و ایران خیلی قوی تر از قبل خودشو آماده کرده برای یک جنگ تمام عیار @holding_negin سایت مجموعه ما. حتما کلیک کن و ببین👇👇 neginmehrabi.com
❤59👍10🔥8
هر گرم طلا ۱۸ عیار 19.100.000 تومان هر گرم نقره با عیار 999.9 415.000 تومان
❤24😎6👀5
سود اخزا رسیده به ۴۰ درصد یعنی پولتو بزاری تو درآمد ثابت و اوراق بخری بهت ۴۰ درصد سود میده حالا به نظرت بیرون و در بازارهای مالی چقدر سود در انتظارت هست که اون صندوق یا بانک حاضره ۴۰ درصدشو بهت بده؟ اونا با پول مردم سرمایه گذاری می کنند خب چرا مردم خودشون سرمایه گذاری نکنند که تمام سودشو بگیرن؟
👍71❤25🥰7
تو سوریه به بشار اسد حکم اعدام دادن دوتا کشتی تو باب المندب زدن یک کشتی تو هرمز زدن اوکراین هم زیرساخت روسیه رو زده ترامپ هم گفته امیدی به مذاکرات نداره و غرامت میخواد تتر هم ۱۸۹ شد نفت ۹۰ دلار طلا از گرمی ۱۹ رد شد خلاصه که اوضاع خوب نیس
❤65👀23👍9
صبح بخیر... همچنان بازارها منتظر نتیجه مذاکرات یا جنگ هستند. ۳ روز تعطیلی و پایان ماه صفر در پیش داریم... بورس هم مثبته ولی یه عده که میخوان نقد کنند میفروشن. ما در بورس سیو سود کردیم و فعلا خریدار نیستیم تا وقتش برسه نفت دیروز مثبت خوبی داشت و امروز هم مثبت هست اما طلا که صبح مثبت باز شد، الان کندل روزانه قرمز شده. به صورت کلی برای ورود به انس طلا یه مقدار دیگه صبر می کنم تا حمله شروع بشه و دوسه روز بگذره بعد وار…
❤49😍7🙏7👀2👍2
فردا ۲۰ مرداد... ۱ نفر ظرفیت ایجاد می کنم که وارد #اکوسیستم بشین اما فقط برای ۱ نفر✅️
❤56👍4😎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @holding_negin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هلدینگ نگین” (@holding_negin), 115,880 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holding_negin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.