Бесплатный курс по Telegram = привлекаем ЦА бесплатно👇
https://bit.ly/46Qp6Ih
Маркетинг. Психология продаж.
📌Как выстроить очередь из клиентов, даже без денег на рекламу
📌Лайфхаки контента, который боятся пропустить
Служба заботы: clck.ru/3F8KbA
Created
Between 1 April 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -401. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,493–22,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 08:21
21,553
-25
19 Sept 2026, 07:40
21,578
-13
17 Sept 2026, 00:40
21,591
-16
15 Sept 2026, 04:37
21,607
-11
13 Sept 2026, 13:16
21,618
-20
11 Sept 2026, 14:39
21,638
-23
9 Sept 2026, 00:58
21,661
-18
5 Sept 2026, 19:16
21,679
-15
3 Sept 2026, 15:55
21,694
-14
2 Sept 2026, 05:35
21,708
-9
1 Sept 2026, 02:14
21,717
-9
31 Aug 2026, 00:16
21,726
-4
29 Aug 2026, 03:23
21,730
-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:54
21,733
-10
27 Aug 2026, 02:35
21,743
-6
25 Aug 2026, 23:57
21,749
-12
25 Aug 2026, 01:32
21,761
-10
23 Aug 2026, 14:24
21,771
-18
22 Aug 2026, 02:37
21,789
-16
20 Aug 2026, 18:05
21,805
first reading
Engagement
110 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.43%
avg views ÷ 21,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
524
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 110 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
110 (30 July 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
14,154
Reactions total
400
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈168
Links
≈889
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,708 reactions across 102 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
488
28.6%
❤
391
22.9%
👍
316
18.5%
😁
199
11.7%
💯
69
4.04%
😎
59
3.45%
😢
31
1.81%
🙏
29
1.70%
👏
27
1.58%
👌
17
0.995%
❤🔥
11
0.644%
🤔
11
0.644%
🥰
11
0.644%
😱
9
0.527%
🤬
9
0.527%
🤯
9
0.527%
😍
8
0.468%
🤝
4
0.234%
🌚
3
0.176%
🤗
2
0.117%
4 further kinds
5
0.293%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ситуация👇
В сентябре вы заработали больше, допустим, на 20-50 тысяч рублей обычного.
Куда их потратите?
Сразу говорю: я уважаю ваш выбор, в этом чате с осуждением никто не столкнется! Вложите в бизнес, купите ребенку куртку или отложите на свою давнюю мечту — любой ваш ответ❤️
Напишите, как потратите деньги)
🔥 в телеграме супер.
💎💚 Пишу по Вашим рекомендациям, Александра: всё радует.
И эмоциональная, и моральная, и финансовая отдача - всё есть.
✅️ Вконтакте теперь осваивать надо. Там 3000-группа, но все руки не доходят по полочкам все разложить.
Завтра закрываю набор на бесплатный МК по ВК
У ВКонтакте прайм-эра:
▪️его точно не заблокируют
▪️алгоритмы наконец устаканились и ваш контент ВК продвигает САМ
▪️а значит ловите бесплатных подписчиков, охваты и деньги с продаж в ВК
Я собрала всю новую инфу по ВКонтакте (помним, да, я не блогер, а маркетолог😎) и подготовила вам 2 дня пользы🔥
Завтра и послезавтра в 19:00 Мск встречаемся в эфирах, я выдам весь сок ВК…
Как вести несколько соцсетей и не выгорать👇
Да, если вы ведете телеграм, а хотите добавить инсту - звучит как "зачем я все это затеваю, тут же и рилсы, и карусели, и сторис".
Лично я всегда иду по пути наименьшего сопротивления. Что это значит?
Если я веду ТГ, то в параллель нужно выбрать ведение той соцсети, где нужно примерно столько же усилий.
То есть если в ТГ тексты — значит эти же тексты я где-то использую😅…
Где взять время на ведение нескольких соцсетей👇
Больная тема для многих🫠
Потому что для ведения нескольких соцсетей нужны заготовки контента, чтобы не тратить миллиард часов.
Чтобы перевыкладывать из одной соцсети в другую — и так по кругу.
А то получается вы сделали 3 поста за сентябрь в ТГ, за август 15 — так соберите их и выложите в октябре всё в ВК. Ничего нового изобретать не нужно. Выложите то, что есть!
…
Вам не нужны залетевшие клипы в ВК!
Попалось видео, где девушка с мольбой рассказывает об отсутствии клиентов на её репетиторские услуги.
Проваливаюсь в профиль, а там классика:
▪️цветочки, мой отпуск, мой ребенок
▪️в шапке профиля ничего, прям вообще 😁
▪️ноль экспертных постов
О продающем контенте я вообще молчу 😭
Дорогие мои, упакуйте страничку/группу, если хотите подписчиков и продажи.
Это же шаг, который дае…
Как собирать аудиторию БЕСПЛАТНО в разных соцсетях👆
Записала подкаст для вас с ответом про Inst, ТГ, Threads и ВК.
Что лучше качает: рилсы, карусели или личные посты?
Прослушайте и с каждого реакция, кто дошел до конца🔥
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @alexandra_gureeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alexandra_gureeva edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Трус Юлия про бизнес @trusprobusiness · 37,678 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
TurboText AI. Нейросети @turbotext_ai · 45,150 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Fabula AI • Нейросеть для селлеров @fabula_community · 124,789 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
Канал Игоря Зуевича @zuevichigor · 39,635 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
̶Д̶о̶к̶т̶о̶р̶ Андрей Курпатов @kurpatov_tg · 70,995 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Алина говорит @alina_telling · 28,446 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Карина Рихтере Мамазония @mamazonija · 73,531 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Михаил Христосенко @m_hristosenko · 25,365 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Семейка ботов @FamilyBots · 710,895 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026
Кудряшов Дмитрий @redsmm · 20,818 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
Про продажи | Федорова Ксения @fedorova_o_pro · 34,069 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
Мария Солодар | Интернет-маркетинг и фриланс @marketing_Solodar · 22,142 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Света Афанасьева @engageforsales · 28,914 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко @kotperegovor · 43,420 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Мастерская Сергея Финько @sverhcheloveksf · 28,677 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг. Александра Гуреева” (@alexandra_gureeva), 21,553 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexandra_gureeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.