Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Продавай текстом

@textvsdoll

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,740subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001898328640
TypeChannel
Username@textvsdoll
DescriptionХочешь, чтобы твои подписчики платили тебе каждый день? Не хочешь париться с запусками, вебинарами и прочими танцами? Тогда этот канал для тебя! Читай закреп)
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 30 June 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/textvsdoll

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@nmiac1/9117 Apr 2026, 09:02 UTC@textvsdoll/486 · this entry17 Apr 2026, 09:37 UTC1.0035 minutes
@nmiac1/9729 Apr 2026, 09:31 UTC@textvsdoll/493 · this entry29 Apr 2026, 09:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@nmiac1/996 May 2026, 11:07 UTC@textvsdoll/494 · this entry7 May 2026, 09:24 UTC1.0022 hours
@nmiac1/10319 May 2026, 11:38 UTC@textvsdoll/495 · this entry27 May 2026, 08:38 UTC1.008 days
@nmiac1/1068 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC@textvsdoll/496 · this entry8 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@nmiac1/1079 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC@textvsdoll/497 · this entry9 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@nmiac112 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@nmiac1 (120)
@nmiacm5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@nmiacm (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 March 2026 to 17 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @nmiac1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,7405,7515,745.57 August 2026 — 5,751 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,751 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,738–5,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:415,740-11
7 Aug 2026, 13:025,751no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:575,751first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
57
Videos
4
Links
322

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2936.7%
🔥2531.6%
👍2430.4%
🍌11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC458 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что ты упустишь, если не поторопишься 🔮 Я дальше ухожу заниматься продюсерскими проектами и обозревать это в клубе (Скоро кстати выйдет новый выпуск реалити) И это последняя возможности увидеть изнанку моих проектов и забрать вот эти материалы 👇🏻 - Как собрать личную AI-систему маркетолога: база знаний, шаблоны, агенты. Рутину делают за тебя. Это твоя первая команда, которой не надо платить зарплату и которая не у

🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 14:54 UTC412 viewsread 12 August 2026

В теории.. Изя, мы миллионеры.. Короче, на рынке же есть излюбленный миф.. Надо взяться пошире, чтобы привлекать аудиторию дешевеле и не терять покупателей И вот очередное подтверждение, что так оно не работает: У меня же есть бот "Постодел", который пишет посты Мы добавили один обязательный вопрос при входе в бота: «У тебя есть канал / нет канала / пишешь для клиентов?» И сели смотреть аналитику по оплатам Бар

15 Jun 2026, 11:22 UTC378 viewsread 12 August 2026

Как хакнуть любой рынок 🤭 Пару лет назад для меня случилось настоящее откровение... Я узнал, что существуют "экспертные интервью" (Это крч интервью, когда ты находишь человека, который уже 10 лет владеет рестораном, и он тебе за 2 часа рассказывает про кууууууучу подводных камней, о которых он узнал на практике, кровью и потом.. И если ты открываешь ресторан — тебе это экономить гооооды работы и миллионы рублей п

12 Jun 2026, 18:20 UTC419 viewsread 12 August 2026

В прошлом году я проводил эксперимент (потратил на него 600к) Я запустил 5 компаний в Яндексе и 5 в еще одной соц-сети (которую не буду называть) Я ничего не менял (вообще) В яндексе - одна пачка крео (10 картинок и текстов в каждой компании) В 2й сетке - другая (другие 10) Трафик шел на одну и ту же посадочную (везде общая) Но! самое забавное: При абсолютно одинаковой рекламе... Цена лида в разных компания в

11 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC398 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI маркетологи [1] В смысловом копирайтинге есть главное правило: Хочешь проверить свой же текст? Отдохни от него 1-2 дня Знаешь почему это так важно? Потому что восприятие замыливается и ты не видишь ЯВНЫХ проблем своей воронки/продажника... И получается также, как у меня на курсах Люди делают сайт, приносят ко мне на зум, чтобы я его разобрал, а там: — Все намешано, не вычленен один сегмент — Результаты плоск

9 Jun 2026, 10:05 UTC373 viewsread 12 August 2026

Вебинар с конверсией 17% в оплату Я не знаю как у вас, но я всегда больше всего сторонился вебинаров С одной стороны ясно, что это самый классный конвертор, который дает лучшие конверсии в заявку/продажу.. лучше всего утепляет аудиторию.. ну и т д С другой... Внутри сколько "но".. Если ты пишешь статью, ты спокойно делаешь кучу правок, пока продающий текст не станет идеальным, вовлекающим и сочным Если записывае

8 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC410 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Да говно этот ваш интернет, не нужон он нам.. Сколько общаюсь со своим окружением, люди в нем делятся на 2 типа: 1) Говно делают эти ваши искусственные интеллекты.. Не нужны они нам (Они мне очень напоминают бизнесы в момент дот-комов в 0-вых. Когда нетфликс пошел делать сайт, а его конкуренты дальше продавали диски) 2) ИИ-шка это конечно прикольно, но это такой темный лес... Свое бы дерьмо разгрести, а тут еще в

👍2

27 May 2026, 08:38 UTC576 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как тренер в спорт зале открыл мне глаза на секрет в продажах. Короче, история. Я пару лет назад начал ходить в зал И в первый день у меня были упражнения на грудь. Подхожу к тренажеру. Ложусь Делаю разминочный подход, с пустым грифом. На второй поход прибавляют 5кг На 3й подход еще 5кг На 4й подход еще 10кг. Примерно на 6м повторении я понимаю, что 40 кг - это мой предел. Я кручусь как уж на сковородке, из п

❤‍🔥10👍4

7 May 2026, 09:24 UTC727 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

О чем делать контент, если ты работаешь не поднимая головы 8-10 часов, и ничего интересного не происходит? Пол года мы допиливали до идеала функционал моего бота "Постодел" Ииии.. я готов к официальному анонсу:) Чем он будет тебе полезен? - Пишет по правилам и формуле Развлечение + обучение + продажа (Ведь всегда нужно удерживать внимание аудитории, чему-то ее учить и прогревать к твоим услугам) - Генерирует иде

🔥4

29 Apr 2026, 09:31 UTC664 viewsread 12 August 2026

Если упрощаешь, думай головой. Или... Горе от ума, и почему ты до сих пор не миллионер.. Короче, в конце 1940-х у ВВС США была серьёзная проблема: пилоты теряли контроль над самолётами. (Тогда же появились реактивные двигатели, что только усугубило ситуацию. За ДЕНЬ могло разбиваться по !17 пилотов! ) И дело было явно не в навыках пилотов, все они проходили полное обучение. И не в кач

28 Apr 2026, 12:41 UTC517 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обосраться 99 раз [Через 8 часов набор в клуб будет закрыт] В рынке живет забавный миф.. Мол, если мы сделаем хороший маркетинг, значица — залетать должно вообще все Все креативы зацепятся Все посадочные дадут невероятные конверсии Каждая воронка будет отрабатывать как папа Карло Обычно же.. Ты запускаешь 10 адсетов, собираешь 3 разные посадки, делаешь А/Б тесты Убиваешь кучу времени В итоге окупается только о

🔥2

27 Apr 2026, 12:05 UTC493 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хороший адвокат выбирает выигрышные дела. Хороший продюсер — растущие ниши. Когда-то я не придавал этой фразе особого значения А зря.. Полтора года я (и моя команда) упорно качали "мышцы маркетинга" Как это выглядело на практике? Мы бежали впереди потухающего рынка. Выдумывали гениальные воронки, писали изощренные тексты, дожимали каждую копейку. Да, мы стали сильнее. Но... Потом до меня дошел один очень прост

🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @textvsdoll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Семейка ботов
@FamilyBots · 704,200
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продавай текстом” (@textvsdoll), 5,740 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/textvsdoll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.