Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Campaign Insider | Павел Дубравский

@electionsquad

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,016subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327713511
TypeChannel
Username@electionsquad
DescriptionИзбирательные кампании – это люди, говорящие с людьми. Канал политконсультанта Павла Дубравского. Для связи с автором: @campaignwarrior (менеджер) https://dubravskiy.consulting
Created30 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/electionsquad

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Campaign Insider — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

12,01212,02612,0196 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,018 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,012 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,016 subscribers12,0166 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,010–12,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0212,016+4
9 Aug 2026, 04:2112,012-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:3012,017-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:5012,018-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:3412,026no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4412,026first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 12,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held28 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total62,985
Reactions total1,401
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,940
Videos
295
Links
2,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 08s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,282 reactions across 25 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁38630.1%
👍18414.4%
1239.59%
🙈1088.42%
🤬947.33%
custom 5235701108193633354745.77%
💯614.76%
custom 5303098357772735242544.21%
🔥483.74%
🤔453.51%
🫡342.65%
😢332.57%
🤯221.72%
custom 5305438367624746114120.936%
🙏30.234%
🌚10.078%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 28 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @electionsquad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC868 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Этот агит-ролик

  1. Великолепен15%
  2. Ужасен43%
  3. Норм42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🙈5custom 523570110819363335431

12 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC887 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

А такое как вам? Со звуком беда, конечно.

👍11custom 53054383676247461145🤬2custom 52357011081936333542

12 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈2,030 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Реальная причина снятия партии «Яблоко» с выборов По своей сути, Яблоко выступает с изоляционистских позиций. Заниматься внутренней политикой, а не международными кампаниями. Сосредоточиться на политике внутри страны, а не вовне. Кто ещё представляет такие позиции? Правильно, Джей Ди Вэнс. Он тоже изоляционист. Выступает против кампании США в Иране. «Выход» Яблока из гонки — это попытка не допустить союза Григо

😁90🙈15👍7🤔4🤬3custom 530309835777273524231custom 52357011081936333541

12 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,790 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Интервью Такера Карлсона и Хантера Байдена про тот самый ноутбук 2020 года. https://youtu.be/M58G-zmqifE?is=rq-OXGAHSBrzftRw

🤯8👍2🤔2custom 52357011081936333542

11 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC≈1,620 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nevenchannyyPhoto

Кто будет определять американскую политику после Трампа — молодые левые, новые консерваторы или расколотые элиты старой системы? Беседую с политологом-американистом Павлом Дубравским о перестройке Демпартии, росте молодых левых кандидатов, тарифной политике Трампа и конфликте федеральной власти со штатами. В выпуске — антиирамповская коалиция Такера Карлсона, Джей Ди Вэнс как претендент на посттрампистское наследст

🔥7custom 53030983577727352425👍4custom 52357011081936333541

11 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,770 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @drunkenpolitolog

У Трезвого политолога возник вопрос - а поездка лидера КПРФ Геннадия Зюганова за предвыборной поддержкой к президенту Республики Беларусь Александру Лукашенко - это же иностранное вмешательство в наши выборы? Партия «Родина» уже готовит иск? Также хотелось бы получить оценку произошедшего от следующих субъектов: - Комиссия Совета Федерации по защите государственного суверенитета и предотвращению вмешательства во вн

😁67💯267custom 52357011081936333547custom 53030983577727352423

11 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈2,250 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Худшее, что я видел в агитации за всю жизнь. Притом, другая агитация у него норм. «Поигрались в капитализм и хватит» и то лучше, и сильнее.

😁43🙈9💯8custom 53054383676247461142👍1custom 52357011081936333541

10 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,210 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mashkomnata

Трампа атакуют не демократы и не пресса, а его собственная медийная машина. Бывший голос Fox и оплот Make America Great Again Такер Карлсон высказывается о президенте как о человеке, который предаёт собственную идеологию и теряет контроль над движением, которое сам же и создал. Специально для вас в авторской колонке The Mash Room Times политолог и основатель агентства "Дубравский консалтинг" Павел Дубравский рассказ

custom 530309835777273524212😁6custom 530543836762474611443👍1custom 52357011081936333541

10 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,590 views153 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кхм, а что если снятие «Яблока» с выборов это хитрая игра в пользу «Новых людей», чтобы первые не спойлерили вторых? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

😁72🤔36🤬21🙈14👍5custom 52357011081936333543💯1😢1

10 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈2,210 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bloodysxVideo

Сегодня впервые за долгие годы в центральном сюжете российской политики партия «Яблоко». Верховный суд начинает рассматривает иск партии Родина о снятии федерального списка Яблока с выборов в Госдуму. Примечателен этот сюжет тем, что «Яблоко» — единственная партия на этих выборов, которая выступает за прекращение огня. Суть претензий «Родины»: ▪️Нарушение авторских прав. Речь идёт о материалах с сайта партии. Истц

🤬36👍1410custom 52357011081936333546😁5🫡3

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈3,220 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ееее коммунизм ❤️

😁25🙈1512custom 52357011081936333545🔥3🌚1🤬1custom 53030983577727352421

6 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈3,080 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @docam_okVideo

Президентство Густаво Петро было переполнено разнообразными конфузами. Это и интервью, когда работа его речевого аппарата заставляла усомниться в том, насколько он трезв. Это и сомнительные кадровые назначения, когда весьма эффектная девушка с фальшивой коркой об образовании оказывалась на руководящей государственной должности. Очередной конфуз случился на концерте, организованном по случаю прощания с Петро, чьи пре

😁24custom 53030983577727352425👍42custom 52357011081936333542🤬1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @electionsquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Poll155 voters

Этот агит-ролик

  1. Великолепен15%
  2. Ужасен43%
  3. Норм42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,000 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Joe Biden - выборы 🇺🇸
@biden · 105
18 posts
Губернаторы в сети
@gubnet · 6,880
3 posts
Деловая репутация
@delrepru · 416
2 posts
Те самые англосаксы
@omganglos · 4,900
2 posts
ТолмачёV наZтоящий
@realtolmachev · 1,306
2 posts
Kynev
@alexander_kynev · 18,584
1 post
Белов из Бибирево
@belov_iz_bibirevo · 343
1 post
Филатова | Digital Projects
@digital_workaholic · 58
1 post
Неудаща
@dirtytatarstan · 38,289
1 post
Доктрина Америки | Олег Краев
@docam_ok · 1,381
1 post
El consultor
@elconsultor · 262
1 post
Kingmaker
@elusivekingmaker · 25
1 post
ОЛЬГА 🇷🇺
@grabovets1 · 976
1 post
Интеллектуальная ярмарка им. Беляева
@Intellectualfair24 · 240
1 post
Информация о политике, выборах и общественной жизни России с точки зрения политического юриста.
@molchanovinfo · 177
1 post
НеБелый Дом
@nonwhitehouse · 148
1 post
Авторский канал Никиты Сетова
@nsetov · 1,517
1 post
Путин 2024 ®️
@proPutin2024 · 84
1 post
Как римляне
@republican_papers · 497
1 post
ВАРИАНТ
@variantnews · 132,857
1 post
Арифметика победы | Зиновьев Дмитрий
@victorithm · 917
1 post
Интеллектуальная ярмарка им. Бугрова
@yarmorkann · 293
1 post
YouRule
@yourule_polit · 626
1 post
Заббаров о (не)политике
@zabbarov_nepolitika · 617
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Campaign Insider | Павел Дубравский” (@electionsquad), 12,016 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electionsquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.