Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kras Mash

@kras_mash

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

50,229subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001158574200
TypeChannel
Username@kras_mash
Created26 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kras_mash

Growth

50,22250,25150,236.55 August 2026 — 50,251 subscribers6 August 2026 — 50,251 subscribers6 August 2026 — 50,240 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,239 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,230 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,222 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,233 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,231 subscribers12 August 2026 — 50,229 subscribers50,2295 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,218–50,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:5650,229-2
12 Aug 2026, 02:1250,231-2
11 Aug 2026, 01:5250,233+11
9 Aug 2026, 23:3450,222-8
8 Aug 2026, 23:1250,230-9
7 Aug 2026, 20:4850,239-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:5250,240-11
6 Aug 2026, 01:4650,251no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1050,251first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 50,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,470
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held47 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total397,960
Reactions total4,084
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 36s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,464 reactions across 41 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬68419.7%
🤡58216.8%
😨43712.6%
43612.6%
🤣37010.7%
👍2838.17%
😭2637.59%
👏1925.54%
😁481.39%
🤔391.13%
🗿381.10%
👎351.01%
😡310.895%
🔥220.635%
🫡20.058%
😍10.029%
🥰10.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,084reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈4,170 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Красноярца оштрафовали за ремонт дорог в Преображенском. Геннадий собрал людей и вывел на улицу, чтобы заделать ямы, на которые закрывали глаза коммунальщики. После публикации видео его пригласили в отделение полиции, заявили, что так делать нельзя, и выписали штраф в 500 рублей. Останавливаться Гена не собирается. Вместе с единомышленниками они уже собрали около 20к и нашли спонсора, который привезёт материалы. В

🤡61👍27🤬16😁14👏3🫡21🗿1

12 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈5,110 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Работник склада красноярского алкомаркета ушёл в разнос прямо на работе. Стоять на ногах он не мог — держаться вертикально помогал стеллаж, но только пока руки не устали. Как работать дальше, ответить он не смог. амбассадор бренда ❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX

😁19🤡9🤬31👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC≈5,330 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Метротрам подорожал не из-за переноса сроков, заявили в компании "Моспроект-3" — дело в изменении проекта. Изначально документы составляли с ценниками 2022 года, а сам проект отличался от того, что фактически нужно сделать. Например, на Копылова туннель пришлось копать глубже, а для стройки нужны были другие материалы. Всё это привело к увеличению сроков и конечной стоимости. Возможны ли надбавки в будущем — пока н

🤣47🤡21🤬17

12 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC≈6,190 views143 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Строительство красноярского метротрама стало дороже больше чем на 30 млрд рублей. Из-за продления сроков до 2028-го пришлось менять цену контракта. По утверждённому дополнительному соглашению она увеличилась с 89 до 123 млрд рублей. ❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX

🤡84🤣41🤬123👍3

11 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈7,600 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

"Конь, б***ь!" Мужик встретил медведя у Крючково и выдал почти самое точно описание увиденного в истории человечества. Ошибся только с видом животного — смотрите со звуком. ❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX

🤣89🤡156🤬5😨1

11 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈7,360 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Переводы между клиентами Сбера и оплата услуг ЖКХ в Сбербанк Онлайн стали бесплатными. Лимитов тоже нет. Изменения доступны 111 миллионам клиентов. В компании выяснили, на что россияне чаще всего отправляют деньги, изучив 150 млн обезличенных сообщений к переводам. В 68% случаев за деньгами стоят забота, внимание или поддержка. Почти треть связана с семьёй — это помощь родителям или детям. Ещё около 20% — это благод

🤡26👍75🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈7,270 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Человек погиб во время пожара в бане у кладбища Бадалык, ещё один пострадал. Огонь на Зарничной разошёлся на 12 квадратов, на месте 10 сотрудников МЧС и две машины. ❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX

😨131

11 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC≈7,720 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Красноярец упал в котлован строящейся ливнёвки на Николаевском проспекте и остался без пальцев на обеих руках. Мужчина возвращался с работы зимой 2024-го, потерял равновесие на лестнице и свалился в яму, сверху рухнуло ограждение. Он пролежал на морозе без сознания всю ночь до прихода рабочих. Позже врачи диагностировали травму головы и ампутировали пальцы на обеих руках из-за сильного обморожения. На гендиректора

😨70😭9🤡43🗿2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC≈7,900 views160 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Поисковая собака потерялась в Красноярском крае. Старк работал в лесу у деревни Малая Кускунка в ночь с 8 на 9 августа и пропал. Узнать его можно по оранжевой шлейке. Хвостатый не агрессивный и не кидается на людей. ❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX

😭12519😨13😁3

10 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈8,630 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мужчина сообщил о нападении медведя на своего друга у Маганска и пропал. Предварительно, он взял телефон у местных детей, позвонил в полицию и рассказал, что хищник кинулся на товарища, когда тот собирал грибы. Звонивший не дождался наряда и исчез. Информация разошлась по местным чатам, а сегодня жители деревни Лукино сообщили, что тоже видели агрессивного хищника. Возможно, это другой медведь. ❤Если не загружаютс

😨30🤬4🤡31👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @kras_mash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kras_mash edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,348 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kras Mash” (@kras_mash), 50,229 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kras_mash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.