Channel
@abualiashari
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,417subscribers
-163 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001010683774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abualiashari |
| Description | The official channel of Abu Ali al-Ashari. |
| Created | 5 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abualiashari |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ahmadalhanafi/427814 Nov 2026, 08:31 UTC | @abualiashari/9115 · this entry14 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC | 1.00 | 15 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ahmadalhanafi | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @ahmadalhanafi (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 99 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 8,417 | +19 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 8,398 | -12 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:16 | 8,410 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 8,427 | -21 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 8,448 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 8,457 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 8,462 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 8,463 | +12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 8,451 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 8,452 | -8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 8,460 | -16 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:18 | 8,476 | -20 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 8,496 | -36 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 8,532 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 8,552 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 8,561 | -21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 8,582 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 8,589 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 8,591 | +31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 8,560 | first reading |
118 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (9 July 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 80,216 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 28 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (50.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
“Скучная” мусульманская жизнь — это нормально. Молиться вовремя, работать, читать Коран, делать зикр на прогулке, есть халяль, копить и проводить время дома — в этом и есть настоящий покой. 🔍 t.me/ahmadalhanafi
Вопрос 243 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Устаз, подскажите ин шаа Аллаh, если женщина будучи в браке с неверующим принимает Ислам, а он не принимает. 1) Им недопустимо вместе дальше жить с момента принятия Ислама? Их же брак тот (кафирский) аннулируется? Или дается какой то срок и в течении этого срока они могут жить вместе (со всеми вытекающими семейными взаимоотношениями). 2) Если она захочет выйти замуж за…
Вопрос 242 السلام عليكم و رحمة الله وبركاته. Устаз если человек выращивает арбузы и сам их продает . Надо ли ему давать ушр с урожая? Ответ: وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Да.
Вопрос 241 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Устаз, скажите, разрешено ли покупать/продавать конский навоз? Те есть без примесей саломы, а чисто продукт жизнедеятельности животного. Ответ: وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Да. كره بيع العذرة) رجيع الآدمي (خالصة لا) يكره بل يصح بيع (السرقين) أي الزبل رد المحتار ٦/٣٨٥
Вопрос 240 Ас-саляму алейкум ва рахматуЛлахи ва баракатух! Уважаемый шейх, у меня два вопроса. Первый — о дозволенности создания изображений живых существ с помощью искусственного интеллекта. Сегодня нейросети позволяют создавать изображения людей и животных по текстовому описанию. Например, человек пишет: «Нарисуй всадника на лошади на фоне гор», после чего нейросеть самостоятельно генерирует изображение. Сам че…
Вопрос 239 Ассаляму алейкум уа рахматуллахи уа баракатух, устаз! Пусть Аллах хранит вас и вашу семью, дарует вам благополучие и баракат. Хотел бы уточнить несколько вопросов относительно прав мужа в отношении вещей, приобретённых им для супруги. 1. Имеет ли муж право забрать у супруги какую-либо вещь, которую ранее приобрёл или подарил ей (например, мобильный телефон), если видит, что её использование оказывает о…
Вопрос 238 ассаляму ‘алейкум уарахматуЛлахи уабаракятух. мой отец погиб (пусть Аллах помилует его), он не успел совершить хадж, но есть высокая вероятность, что раз в жизни он для него становился фардом (были деньги, здоровье, время и т.п.) я хочу совершить хадж от его имени - нужно ли мне точно знать и разобраться, был ли он для него фардом или мне достаточно намерения на совершение хаджа от его имени? джазакаЛл…
Вопрос 237 Ассаламу алейкум, устаз Абу Али. Одним из множеств учителей имама Абу Ханифы был имам Мухаммад аль-Бакир (5-й имам в концепции шиитов-имамитов). Возникает вопрос. Был ли сам имам аль-Бакир на убеждениях, что он избранный Аллахом имам, один из 12-ти или он был суннитом?
Вопрос 236 Ассаламуалейкум Устаз Пусть всевышний Аллагь хранит вас от всех бед этой и последующей жизни Амин ! В чет отличие от исбата ханабиля и от исбата салафия Я слышал от шейха Саида Фуды что есть много правильных вариантов исбата
Вопрос 235 السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Что из сиры не знать будет куфром? Если человек знает что много войн было но детально не знает про них то это куфр? Например много важнвх людей есть в сире, является ли обязательно знать их всех? баракаЛлаху фикум
Вопрос 234 Ассалямуалейкум Правда ли что в Ашаритском мазхабе есть мнение что речь Аллаха предвечная и в произношении и в смысле ?
Вопрос 233 Ассалам алайкум. Сыфат Ирада делает тахсыс только мумкина , а как тогда получается тахсыс ваджиба виде махлюка, например занимание места телом это ваджиб , а как тогда связывается с этим сыфат ? Если человек сидит перед мной , его сидение и то что я его вижу , к какой категории относится - ваджиб адий или мумкин аклий или как ?
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @abualiashari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abu Ali al-Ashari” (@abualiashari), 8,417 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abualiashari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.