Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АНТИВАХХАБИЗМ

Channel

АНТИВАХХАБИЗМ

@antiwahhabism

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,330subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215964679
TypeChannel
Username@antiwahhabism
Created9 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/antiwahhabism

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3041,3301,3176 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,316 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,314 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,312 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,311 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,308 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,307 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,308 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,305 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,304 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,322 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,330 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,300–1,334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:001,330+8
13 Sept 2026, 14:191,322+18
9 Sept 2026, 10:151,304-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:451,305-3
26 Aug 2026, 05:011,308+1
23 Aug 2026, 04:341,307-1
19 Aug 2026, 15:261,308-3
16 Aug 2026, 09:081,311-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:451,312-2
9 Aug 2026, 18:421,314-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:211,316no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:081,316first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

424 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21650.9%
5813.7%
🔥4310.1%
😁429.91%
🤬358.25%
😱133.07%
👎122.83%
👏30.708%
😢10.236%
🤔10.236%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 6 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2026, 21:52 UTC778 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @aqida_hanbaly

https://youtu.be/esh8kOyITRY?si=9Hh6dB6FP434nduF

👍7

28 Jan 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,270 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @virus_vahhabizma

Идеология ваххабизма охватила практически весь мир. Она стала неким вирусом, проникающим в умы мусульман, которые желают познавать свою религию. Каждый разумный богослов уже много лет предостерегает от следования за этой идеологией, так как погубила множество людей. Канал «Вирус ваххабизма» https://t.me/virus_vahhabizma раскрывает суть этой опасной идеологии и показывает все аспекты её деструктивного влияния на умы м

👍104👎1

20 Jan 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,330 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @abualiashari

Видно, что саляфитская школа начинает потихоньку рассыпаться изнутри. Мы, как оппоненты этой школы, критикуем её, пишем опровержения. Однако это не принесёт столь сильного результата, как внутренние изменения внутри самой школы. Дело в том, что то, что построено на лжи и подтасовках, не может существовать долго и в конечном итоге развалится как школа. Как только Саудовская Аравия прекратит финансирование саляфизма

🔥228👍5🤔1😁1

1 Jan 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,340 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahmadalhanafi

Шейх Саид Фуда пишет в «Шарх аль‑Кабире» — комментарии к «Акыде ат‑Тахавия», — что ваххабиты дозволяют ложь в отношении своих оппонентов. Он отмечает, что, если рассмотреть постоянные стычки с ними, на практике становится очевидно: они лгут о своих оппонентах и фактически дозволяют это для себя. Они не видят в этом проблем и ничего зазорного. То есть, даже если доказать им, что мы не говорим того, что они нам приписы

👍204😁1😢1

23 Dec 2025, 09:29 UTC≈1,690 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Примерно двадцать лет назад я произнес с минбара, смысл чего был таков: "Я не знаю ни одной еретической группы (мубтади‘) со времён саляфов и до наших дней, которая нанесла бы исламской умме такой вред, как та, что оборвала её связь с Хадрой-Мухаммадия и направила бы свои стрелы против этой благородной святыни под самыми разными предлогами, как это сделали ваххабиты. Это порочное мышление, из которого вырастают поро

👍257😁1

23 Oct 2025, 19:34 UTC≈6,060 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

16👍14👏3👎1

23 Aug 2025, 18:26 UTC≈2,730 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/APA0htT-AV0?si=jXCFdrWD7iwxQhr5

👍62👎1

3 Aug 2025, 05:51 UTC≈2,580 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/iRVvYoZEsVM?si=-I5BM0F_CNEZyBiZ

👍5👎1

24 Jun 2025, 15:07 UTC≈2,600 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://youtu.be/1AxOxtwK6w0?si=xOE1BohlUElIZ9dB

👍12👎1

15 Jun 2025, 15:16 UTC≈2,490 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍4👎3

9 Jun 2025, 20:23 UTC≈2,540 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍28🔥43👎1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @antiwahhabism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АНТИВАХХАБИЗМ” (@antiwahhabism), 1,330 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antiwahhabism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.