Channel
@AhlusSunnahForum
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,353subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001010436868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AhlusSunnahForum |
| Created | Between 1 October 2015 and 31 January 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AhlusSunnahForum |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,353 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 3,352 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,355 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 3,355 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 March 2026 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,361 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Mar‘i ibn Yusuf al-Karmi & Two Senses of Affirming the Upward Direction (Jihat al-Fawq/al-‘Uluww) for Allah Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1156/karmi-affirming-upward-direction-allah __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
Ibn Taymiyyah Inclining to the Heresy of Fana’ al-Nar in Later Life Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/post/2382/thread __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
‘Allamah Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri’s Strict Observance of Pardah With Female Disciples Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1155/allamah-saharanpuri-strict-pardah-disciples __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
‘Allamah Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri’s Prescription to Female Disciples Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1154/allamah-saharanpuri-prescription-female-disciples __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
Tāj al-Dīn al-Subkī (727–771 AH) states: “Amongst the duties of (the sulṭān’s representatives) is to repel the people of innovations and deviant beliefs, and to avert their evil from the Muslims. There is no scope for them within the religion of Allāh Most High to tolerate those who revile the two shaykhs Abū Bakr and ‘Umar, slander ‘Ā’ishah, mother of the believers, and corrupt the beliefs of the adherents of relig…
Imam Abu ‘l-Muzaffar al-Isfarayini (d.471 AH) said: “(From the beliefs of Ahl al-Sunnah wa ‘l-Jama‘ah) is that you recognise that those who are practitioners of taqlid within the laws of Shari‘ah – it is necessary for them to ask. And it is not permissible for them to ask (anyone and) everyone. Had that been allowed, it would have been permitted to act based on their own mind – as there’s no difference between one p…
Exceptions to Not Mentioning the Faults of the Deceased By Mufti Zameelur Rahman Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/post/2377/thread __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
Shaykh Abu ‘l-Hasan ‘Ali al-Nadwi on Changing Attitudes to Modesty & Islamic Values in the Arab World (1951 CE) Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1153/hasan-nadwi-declining-islamic-values __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
Sayyid Ahmad Shahid (1786–1831 CE) and Mawlana ‘Abd al-Hayy Budhanawi (d. 1828 CE) Rectify Incorrect Practices of Pardah in Calcutta (1821 CE) Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1152/sayyid-ahmad-shahid-purdah-calcutta __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7aLtv4Spk89JPYvj16
Research Paper: The Limits of Judicial Dissolution of Marriage (Faskh) and the Phenomenon of Sharīʿah Councils Overextending Their Authority | Mufti Zameelur Rahman Download Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1151/research-paper-faskh-shariah-malpractice __ Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel…
Shaykh Habib al-Rahman al-A‘zami (1901–1992 CE), one of the major scholars of Deoband from the last century and a well-known Hadith expert, states in a 1943 CE booklet responding to an Ahl-i-Hadith figure called Abu ‘l-Qasim Saif Banirisi: “In this connection, he expressed great displeasure about a marginal note (by Wasi Ahmad Surati) on Sunan al-Nasa’i, although there is no reason for displeasure. This is because, …
Mawlana Hakim Muhammad Akhtar (1928–2013 CE) said in a talk delivered in 1999 CE: “If a person's harm extends to others, then one may inform others about his evil. For example, if someone is religiously misguided, writes misguided literature and tries to mislead the ummah, it is obligatory upon the ‘ulama’ to write against him: ‘This person is misguided; do not read his books; do not listen to his words,’ (and so on…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AhlusSunnahForum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 87,411 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ahlus Sunnah Forum” (@AhlusSunnahForum), 3,353 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AhlusSunnahForum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.