Люди спорят о сущности Всевышнего — а вспоминают о Нём лишь в час бедствия. Люди спорят о речи Всевышнего — а Книгу Его оставляют без чтения. Люди спорят о качествах Всевышнего — а сами далеки от нравов благочестия. Люди спорят о путях спасения — а сами сторонятся пути спасения. Люди спорят: кто на манхадже Пророка ﷺ и кто ближе к истине, а сами далеки от его ﷺ нравов и нравов его сподвижников — вот она, горькая …

Channel
كسوف الحقيقة
@booklipsee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002475412402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @booklipsee |
| Description | ترجو النجاة ولم تسلك مسالكها إن السفينة لا تجري على اليبس |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/booklipsee |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 9 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 124.4%
- avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.2
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 175
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 116
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Шейх ибн Таймийя: "وأما جمهور الأمة وأهل الحديث والفقه والتصوف فعلى ما جاءت به الرسل وما جاء عنهم من الكتب والاثارة من العلم وهم المتبعون للرسالة اتباعا محضا لم يشوبوه بما يخالفه" "Большинство имамов, мухадисов, факъихов, суфиев следуют тому, с чем пришёл Пророк ﷺ, и то, что пришло от них, это из книги и знаний. Они являются чистыми последователями Пророка, не добавляя что–либо, противоречащее Шари'ату" «Маджму’ …
Шейх Ибн Таймия говорит о том, что способность праведников летать и ходить по воде не противоречит Шариату! И что наличие способности к этим чудесам, не дает права выходить за рамки Шариата: فأما المستقيمون من السالكين كجمهور مشايخ السلف مثل الفضيل بن عياض , وإبراهيم بن أدهم , وأبي سليمان الدارني , ومعروف الكرخي , والسري السقطي , والجنيد بن محمد , وغيرهم من المتقدمين , مثل الشيخ عبد القادر الجيلاني, والشيخ حماد , و…
АБУАЛИ АШАРИ. - научная деятельность - уроки - книги - критика и несогласие - как быть «за» него - как быть против него https://t.me/IBN_ABI_HAMID
Салафиты назвали ашаритов джахмитами, в то время как саляфы считали джахмитов хуже рафидитов. Но когда дело касается фикха, мы не видим, чтобы они говорили: «Сказал аль-Кулейни в “аль-Кафи”» или «Сказал ат-Туси в “Тахзиб аль-ахкам”». Но они говорят: «Сказал ан-Навави», «Сказал аль-Бухути», «Сказал Закария аль-Ансари» и так далее. Когда дело касается хадиса, они не говорят: «Привёл Мухаммад Бакир в “Бихаруль-анвар”…
Что такое «кайфиййя/كيفية» в отношении сыфатов Аллаха? Абу Амин https://t.me/al_minhaj #вопрос_ответ #акыда
https://telegra.ph/Asar-imama-Malika-ob-istiva-06-02
Человек спросил: «О Абу ‘Абдуллах! Милостивый истава́ над Троном — каково это истава́? (Что это?)» Вдумайтесь: перед вами — имам Даруль-Хиджры, мухаддис Малик ибн Анас, один из величайших ученых этой уммы, чье знание и богобоязненность засвидетельствованы поколениями. И именно к нему обращен этот вопрос — вопрос, который сегодня задают с такой легкостью, будто спрашивают о погоде. При этом, они добавляют: «это же л…
Имам ибн 'Абдиль-Барр, да смилуется над ним Аллах, пишет: وقد كان مالكٌ يُنكِرُ على مَن حدَّث بمثل هذه الأحاديث. ذكَره أصبغُ وعيسى، عن ابنِ القاسم، قال: سألتُ مالكًا عمَّن يُحدِّثُ الحديثَ: «إنَّ اللهَ خَلَقَ آدمَ على صورَته»، والحديثَ: «إنَّ اللهَ يكشِفُ عن ساقِه يومَ القيامةِ»، وأنَّه يُدخِلُ في النارِ يَدَه حتى يُخرجَ مَن أرادَ. فأنكرَ ذلك إنكارًا شديدًا، ونَهى أن يُحدِّثَ به أحدٌ وإنَّما كَرِه ذلك مالكٌ خشيةَ ال…
Имам аз-Захаби: فأما كتاب (المضنون به على غير أهله) فمعاذ الله أن يكون له، شاهدت على نسخة به بخط القاضي كمال الدين محمد بن عبد الله الشهرزوري أنه موضوع على الغزالي، وأنه مختارع من كتاب (مقاصد الفلاسفة)، وقد نقضه الرجل بكتاب (التقافت) «Что касается книги "аль-Маднун бихи ‘аля гайри ахлихи", то упаси Аллах, чтобы она принадлежала ему… Я видел на одном экземпляре, написанном рукой судьи Камаль ад-Дина Мухаммада ибн ‘…
Караматы Имама Ахмада Имам ибн Муфлих аль-Ханбали в «Аль-Адаб аш-Шар’ия» (2/97): пишет: وقالت فاطمة بنت أحمد بن حنبل: وقع الحريق في بيت أخي صالح، وكان قد تزوج إلى قومٍ مياسير فحملوا إليه جهازاً شبيهاً بأربعة آلاف دينار فأكلته النار، فجعل صالح يقول: ما غَمَّني ما ذهبَ مني إلا ثوبَ أبي كان يصلي فيه؛ أتبركُ به وأصلي فيه. قالت: فطفءَ الحريقُ ودخلوا فوجدوا الثوبَ على سرير قد أكلت النار ما حوله والثوبُ سالم. Фатима, доч…
https://youtu.be/9jROiGMEFUg?si=Io_jF-Kal3UV803y
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @booklipsee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,142,722 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كسوف الحقيقة” (@booklipsee), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booklipsee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.