Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сигналы РЦБ Крипто

Channel

Сигналы РЦБ Крипто

@usa100cks

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,046subscribers

-233 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154838044
TypeChannel
Username@usa100cks
DescriptionСигналы РЦБ Крипто - платформа аналитики и новостей по крипто-рынку для трейдинга и инвестиций. Аналитика новостей и идеи. По рекламе: @signalstiven Админ чата: @cbr_support ❗️ Продукт #1 для трейдеров с 2020: Шпион за рынком РФ и Крипты: @StockSpy_bot
Created20 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/usa100cks

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@usa100cks/28052 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC@cbrstocks/839013 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC1.002 minutes
@usa100cks/28070 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC@cbrstocks/839275 Nov 2026, 10:13 UTC1.0012 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@cbrstocks17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutesthis entry (17–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 414 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,04517,31017,177.517,0466 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,005–17,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 03:0717,046-1
10 Nov 2026, 05:5117,047+2
8 Nov 2026, 21:4517,045-6
7 Nov 2026, 16:2017,051-2
6 Nov 2026, 18:3817,053-1
5 Nov 2026, 15:4517,054-6
4 Nov 2026, 18:3817,060+2
3 Nov 2026, 19:3917,058+2
2 Nov 2026, 21:0617,056-5
1 Nov 2026, 22:0617,061-1
1 Nov 2026, 00:4917,062-4
31 Oct 2026, 01:1917,066+4
30 Oct 2026, 03:1017,062-4
28 Oct 2026, 23:3717,066-7
27 Oct 2026, 22:3917,073+5
26 Oct 2026, 19:4117,068-4
25 Oct 2026, 17:2517,072-5
24 Oct 2026, 16:0617,077-4
23 Oct 2026, 16:0017,081-5
22 Oct 2026, 18:3117,086first reading

Engagement

445 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 17,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
121 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.142%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
121
of 445 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 121 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held445 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total245,915
Reactions total203
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 05:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,950
Videos
≈552
Links
≈3,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
42m 42s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

476 reactions across 141 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁23048.3%
❤8618.1%
👍479.87%
👎265.46%
🔥234.83%
👏224.62%
💩142.94%
🤔91.89%
🐳81.68%
🦄71.47%
😢40.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 187 of the 445 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 445 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 121 posts held from the last 30 days (9.92%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 23:03 UTC≈7,250 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Дженсен Хуанг на обсуждении Совета Директоров об отстранении с поста СЕО

❤3

11 Nov 2026, 22:55 UTC≈7,390 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Изменил жене -> изменит и стране (с) Трамп

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 22:40 UTC≈7,650 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#NVDA Нвидиа готовит уход Дженсена Хуанга с поста СЕО — WSJ NVIDIA PREPARING TO OUST NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: WSJ

11 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 12 November 2026

Банк Израиль Дискаунт станет первым израильским банком, который позволит клиентам покупать, хранить и продавать биткоин Банк с активами в $150 млрд также предложит торговлю Ethereum - соответствующая функция появится в его мобильном приложении 26 ноября.

11 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 12 November 2026

⚠️ В сервисе Privy произошел серьезный сбой, специалисты в настоящее время выясняют причины произошедшего.

11 Nov 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,150 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🏦 OKX и владелец NYSE запустят площадку для торговли токенизированными акциями 23 ноября ➤ Совместная платформа OKXICE начнёт работу в рамках пятилетнего экспериментального режима SEC, позволяющего торговать токенизированными ценными бумагами без регистрации в качестве традиционной биржи. ➤ На данный момент подтверждены 70 активов, включая акции Coinbase, Circle и Robinhood, а также 59 ETF. Доступ получат пользоват…

🔥2

11 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC918 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ В Bitcoin Core раскрыли три уязвимости, включая одну высокой степени опасности ➤ Разработчики Bitcoin Core опубликовали информацию о трёх уязвимостях, обнаруженных ещё в 2025 году. Все они были исправлены в октябре прошлого года, но подробности раскрыли только сейчас. ➤ Самая серьёзная ошибка затрагивала майнинг. После реорганизации блокчейна мемпул мог оказаться в некорректном состоянии, из-за чего майнеры теря…

11 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTC844 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🤖 Jordi Visser: следующий большой этап роста крипторынка будет связан с ИИ-агентами Джорди Виссер - макроинвестор с более чем 30-летним опытом, бывший управляющий директор Morgan Stanley и инвестиционный директор Weiss Multi-Strategy Advisers. В недавнем интервью Venture Coinist он поделился несколькими тезисами: ➤ Крипторынок напоминает период после краха доткомов. Многие ранние сторонники разочаровались, спекуля…

11 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC847 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Тем временем аккаунт Телеграма в тиктоке.

💩4😁3

11 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC912 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Forward Industries увеличила запасы Solana до 8,7 млн SOL ➤ С конца сентября компания приобрела и получила через стейкинг около 226 000 SOL. Теперь её резервы составляют 8,7 млн SOL стоимостью примерно $726,5 млн — около 1,5% всего SOL в обращении. ➤ Forward остаётся крупнейшим публичным корпоративным держателем Solana. Для сравнения, у ближайшего конкурента DeFi Development Corp. чуть более 2,6 млн SOL. ➤ Компани…

11 Nov 2026, 08:45 UTC950 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Паша, попробуй не продавать на каждой горке, и возможно такие заявления действительно будут иметь смысл.

😁6🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,030 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

💰 Бывший технический директор Ripple продал почти всю свою криптовалюту из-за страха перед риском ➤ Дэвид Шварц рассказал, что значительно сократил свои криптовалютные накопления, поскольку крайне плохо переносит рыночную волатильность. ➤ На пике он владел примерно 26 млн XRP, 1500 BTC и 40 000 ETH. Сейчас у него осталось всего 3 млн XRP, 1 BTC и 6 ETH. ➤ Шварц объяснил своё решение просто: он «очень, очень не люб…

Showing the 12 most recent of 445 posts we hold for @usa100cks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сигналы РЦБ
@cbrstocks · 117,223
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Trading Family (Crypto PROFIT)
@profit_cryptoss · 19,793
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Tom Capital
@tomcapital · 31,541
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 131,891
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
IF Crypto
@if_crypto_ru · 52,868
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
CryptoKogan
@cryptokogan · 40,598
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
headlines
@headlines_for_traders · 114,606
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Rezan Invest
@rezinv · 19,649
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 September 2026
SosisochnayaGazeta
@sosisochnayagazeta · 71,816
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
MOEX-info
@moex_info · 20,017
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 341,184
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Криптомир с Оксаной Мащенко
@cryptooxana · 20,472
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
Крипто сливы
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,423
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
КриптоЗайцман
@cryptozaycman · 21,214
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
Залим Сохов - ON FLEEK investing
@onfleek419 · 37,067
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Аналитика От Чехова
@antonchehovanalitk · 46,069
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
bitkogan⚡️HOTLINE
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,741
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
🏡 Уютный | Инвестиции
@cozytrade · 99,782
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Stock News
@Stock_News100 · 18,698
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
ЗЛОЙ ФИНАНСИСТ 😡
@finpizdec · 54,361
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
РынкиДеньгиВласть | РДВ
@AK47pfl · 114,402
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
headlines GEO
@headlines_geo · 19,891
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 September 2026
Рублядоллар
@roubledollar · 25,821
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
headlines MACRO
@headlines_MACRO · 19,448
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сигналы РЦБ Крипто” (@usa100cks), 17,046 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usa100cks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.