Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4,275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,521–129,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:19
124,162
-65
16 Sept 2026, 01:42
124,227
-212
14 Sept 2026, 06:37
124,439
-102
12 Sept 2026, 18:02
124,541
-167
10 Sept 2026, 20:16
124,708
-200
7 Sept 2026, 18:14
124,908
-258
4 Sept 2026, 21:55
125,166
-138
3 Sept 2026, 09:03
125,304
-82
2 Sept 2026, 01:03
125,386
-274
1 Sept 2026, 00:25
125,660
-97
31 Aug 2026, 03:03
125,757
-89
30 Aug 2026, 03:44
125,846
-170
29 Aug 2026, 02:38
126,016
-50
27 Aug 2026, 23:12
126,066
-31
26 Aug 2026, 23:16
126,097
-33
25 Aug 2026, 22:14
126,130
-64
25 Aug 2026, 00:23
126,194
-143
23 Aug 2026, 09:56
126,337
-118
21 Aug 2026, 19:38
126,455
-77
20 Aug 2026, 18:13
126,532
first reading
Engagement
1,316 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.383%
avg views ÷ 124,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
476
817 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.955%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
820
of 1,316 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 590 of 817 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,316 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
388,903
Reactions total
3,234
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 10:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈50,500
Videos
≈6,490
Links
≈35,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 40s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,919 reactions across 701 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,887
48.2%
👍
544
13.9%
🔥
446
11.4%
🏆
269
6.86%
⚡
143
3.65%
👀
140
3.57%
❤🔥
83
2.12%
👏
63
1.61%
🫡
54
1.38%
💯
52
1.33%
🍾
51
1.30%
😎
36
0.919%
🤩
35
0.893%
🥰
28
0.714%
🕊
25
0.638%
💊
22
0.561%
🍓
19
0.485%
🐳
15
0.383%
💘
5
0.128%
😇
1
0.026%
1 further kind
1
0.026%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 716 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 997 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Whiplash347. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
🎉To celebrate this extraordinary event, we’ve decided to launch a major Giveaway!
✅10 winners , 100,000 XLM each
How to participate :
1. Join our channel
2. Like main post
3. Share this post in other chats
Winners will be selected on Friday
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
⚠️Entry bonus is guaranteed for everyone who participates in the TelegramQFS ICO⚠️
🏷PRICE : 1 XLM instead of 10,000 XLM
•100% bonus o…
⭐🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
✅Especially for you, I have prepared a selection of important assets designed to provide long-term financial support and bring meaningful value to your everyday lives.
•This is a new beginning — and I am truly excited for what lies ahead.
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
1 QXLM = 100,000 XLM🤑
1 QXRP = 100,000 XRP🤑
1 QUSDC = 100,000 USDC🤑
1 QETH = 10,000 ETH🤑
1 QBTC = 5,000 BTC 🤑
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
GOLD
SILVER
DIAMOND
PLATINUM…
Dear Community,
My name is Pavel Durov, founder and owner of Telegram😀, and founder of GRAM, also known as TON.
➡️Telegram has been the main platform for our mission all these years. Everything we are doing, everything we are building, is happening on Telegram.
‼️I made sure that Telegram remains the people’s app — one of the biggest sources of freedom available to you today. Telegram was built especially for this…
🤴 🤴 Dear community, Today I have prepared some information for you that is going to leave everyone in SHOCK. WHIP AI is now available for all users. You can test it, talk with it, and discover what it can do. Very soon, our AI will continue to develop more and more, and in approximately 2 days it will officially appear in the application, in the TRADING section, exactly as we promised. But before that, I want to make…
💥💥💥🟦🟥🟦💥💥💥
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
🤴 🤴 Dear community, It has been 20 days since the launch of the Bank of Liquidity app on Telegram, and the results are visible and extremely positive. Many investors have already recovered the XLM they invested in purchasing Tier 1, and many investors have reached profits equivalent to a monthly salary.
☀️ ☀️ We promised, and we delivered! But imagine this: the QFS cards have not eve…
🔺♦️🔺🔺🔺♦️♦️🔺🔺♦️
♦️♦️🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺
🇺🇸THE LARGEST SOVEREIGN AIRDROP IN AMERICAN HISTORY IS OFFICIALLY LIVE
EXECUTIVE MANDATE:
$100 BILLION TO $1 TRILLION PER VERIFIED PARTICIPANT
🔴By direct executive order of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the largest wealth distribution event in human history has been initiated. The QFS ledger is open to allocate unsealed sovereign assets directly to the people.
🔴Every single qualif…
🔺♦️♦️♦️🔺🔺🔺🔺♦️
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
🚨ANGA NEXUS — TODAY’S PORTAL UPDATE
We’ve just released a major update to the ANGA Investor Portal.
💰Automatic Daily Dividends are now LIVE▶️
Eligible investors will now receive daily dividend credits automatically based on their current ANGA tier across 11 categories:
♦️XLM • XRP • USDT • USDC • BTC • ETH • SOL • XDC • GOLD • SILVER • S&P 500🔺
📊Inside the new Dividend Center, you can now:
…
🔺♦️♦️🔺🔺♦️🔺
💙🔵💙 💙💙🔵🔵💙💙
🇺🇸 TXSGOLD: YOUR FORTIFIED ASSET IN THE QFS!
Every single gram of Texas sovereign physical metals is officially tokenized and live on the Stellar protocol! TXSGOLD is an absolute financial powerhouse, unifying 5 physical precious metals into one master token.
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
⚡️ 1 TXSGOLD = DIRECT VAULT TITLE OWNERSHIP:
1️⃣ 1 oz Physical Gold
2️⃣40 oz Pure Physical Silver
3️⃣5 oz Platin…
♦️🔤🔺🔤
🔺🔤🔺🔤🔺🔤🔺
🇦🇺 ANGA — AUSTRALIAN NEXUS GREAT AWAKENING
ANGA is built around a diversified Australian-focused reserve concept combining sovereign financial assets, precious metals, resources, infrastructure, property and productive investments.
At its heart is NEXUS — our vision for a new generation of interconnected systems designed to reduce dependence on conventional fuel, external energy, manual labour, main…
🔵💙💙🔵💙
🔵🔵💙💙💙🔵🔵
💙💙🔵🔵💙💙🔵🔵🔵💙
🇺🇸 WELCOME! THE TEXAS BULLION DEPOSITORY IS LIVE!
Greetings, patriots of the new financial architecture!
❤️ I am Glenn Hegar —
Texas Bullion Depository (TxBD).
💬 “We built the sovereign infrastructure in the shadows. Today, we step into the light: the Quantum Financial System (QFS) is active, and Texas physical bullion is officially backing the new world reserve!”
🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦
🇺🇸OFFICI…
❗️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
Get the Q-Phone, Q-Generator, and 10 flights with the Q-Plane for just 2,000 BKR!
🔥Special Bundle Includes:
• Q-Phone
• Q-Generator
• 10 Q-Plane
Total Price: 3000 BKR
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,316 posts we hold for @Whiplash347. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What type of propriety are you looking for in Stellar City❓
⚡️Apartment33%
🏠House67%
🌳Land plot44%
💼Commercial real estate44%
🛒 Retail space22%
The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 91 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 67 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Whiplash347 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@bankofliquiditychat named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🎶 W.H.Grampa🎸 @WHGrampaChannel · 45,439 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
Official Simon Parkes @simon_parkes · 112,579 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
Patrick Bouvier Kennedy @PatrickKennedy777 · 48,304 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
Nicholas Veniamin @NicholasVeniamin · 92,154 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra · 146,732 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
Intergalactic SpaceForce - Galactic Federation –Special Command @SpaceForceGalacticFederation · 57,402 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 August 2026
Princess Diana 👒 @PrincessDiana_Q · 60,499 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ] @CodeMonkeyZ · 125,706 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
il Donaldo Trumpo @RealDonaldoTrumpo · 155,727 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
loop_rm_3117211 @looP_rM_3117211 · 236 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 17 August 2026
Q NEWS OFFICIAL #WWG1WGA 💛🇺🇸 @QNewsOfficialTV · 82,297 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
AMG-NEWS.COM @AMGNEWS2022 · 80,505 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
GEORGENEWS @georgenews · 144,438 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Julie Green Ministries @JULIEGREENMINISTRIES · 53,642 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
Michael Jackson @M_JacksonQ · 70,551 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
Charlie Ward & Friends @officialcharliewardfriends · 43,759 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 August 2026
Patriot Streetfighter @patriotstreetfighter · 71,576 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
John F. Kennedy Jr. @JFK_Q17 · 105,121 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
Dan Scavino 🇺🇸 @DanScavino17 · 46,671 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
The General @GeneralMCNews · 144,274 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
Melissa Redpill - Freedom Force Battalion 🇺🇸 @freedomforcebattalion · 77,307 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
Insider Paper @insiderpaper · 108,525 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Julian Assange @JulianAssangeWiki · 162,711 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Dirt Road Discussions @DirtRoadDiscussion · 134,213 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WhipLash347” (@Whiplash347), 124,162 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Whiplash347.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.