Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RVhighlights

@RVhighlights

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,880subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001584896343
TypeChannel
Username@RVhighlights
Created23 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RVhighlights

Growth

27,88027,90127,890.56 August 2026 — 27,901 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,901 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,900 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,897 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,896 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,895 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,885 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,887 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,880 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,877–27,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:1827,880-7
12 Aug 2026, 02:3227,887+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:0827,885-10
10 Aug 2026, 03:5227,895-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:5127,896-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:3727,897-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:4427,900-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:0027,901no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:5427,901first reading

Engagement

176 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 27,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
176 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
176
of 176 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held176 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total571,198
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 47s
Average length
2m 33s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

According to Frank 26 the three zeros are confirmed

12 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoinDeskGlobalPhoto

Fidelity moves to add staking, quarterly payouts to near $900 million ether ETF The fund would keep 85% of gross staking rewards, with the remaining 15% going to service providers.

12 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The 2026 budget a laws to delete zeros from the Iraqi currency

Showing the 12 most recent of 176 posts we hold for @RVhighlights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 79,053 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Shadow of Ezra
@ShadowofEzra · 149,087
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
Julian Assange
@JulianAssangeWiki · 163,872
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
il Donaldo Trumpo
@RealDonaldoTrumpo · 158,392
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
BRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,851
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
The General
@GeneralMCNews · 145,930
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
Q) The Storm Rider /Official Page
@qthestormrider777 · 158,237
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RVhighlights” (@RVhighlights), 27,880 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RVhighlights.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.