💙🤑 I LOVE YOU GUYS!! You are the only reason I'm still working and building... You are my dream. NOT QFS. NOT LIQUIDITY. You are The Family. You are why WE HOLD the line.
❤74🔥23💯13
Signed Craig Maclachlan

Channel
@TheNew_QFS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,867subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002277221706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheNew_QFS |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheNew_QFS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 1,867 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 1,861 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 1,861 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,113 |
| Reactions total | 1,732 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,732 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 905 | 52.3% | |
| 🔥 | 322 | 18.6% | |
| 🎉 | 77 | 4.45% | |
| 👍 | 77 | 4.45% | |
| 🥰 | 69 | 3.98% | |
| 🏆 | 63 | 3.64% | |
| 🙏 | 63 | 3.64% | |
| ❤🔥 | 49 | 2.83% | |
| custom 5462902520215002477 | 21 | 1.21% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 1.15% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5417924076503062111 | 9 | 0.52% | |
| custom 5249244235294591930 | 8 | 0.462% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 0.462% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 0.404% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.404% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.289% | |
| custom 5449759615346548186 | 4 | 0.231% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,732reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheNew_QFS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💙🤑 I LOVE YOU GUYS!! You are the only reason I'm still working and building... You are my dream. NOT QFS. NOT LIQUIDITY. You are The Family. You are why WE HOLD the line.
❤74🔥23💯13
Signed Craig Maclachlan
🤑 NEWMETALS. COMING SOON... THE FIRST and ONLY METAL PROTOCOL on STELLAR. Tomorrow.. (be ready)
❤36🔥15
Signed Craig Maclachlan
💪 Listen up, Digital Soldiers... we've been holding the line in the fiat trenches. We've fortified the banks. We've secured the IRAs. But the architects have been working on something else in the blind. Something tangible. Something that doesn't just store value—it forges it. What if I told you there's a new asset class coming? One that combines the immutable scarcity of the blockchain with the raw, physical weigh…
❤47🔥34🙏5
Signed Craig Maclachlan
⚖️ “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction" 📇 We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for.. protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like... 🔴 This is why you chose to invest in what we are building here. 🔴 This is why you opened your NEWBANK a…
❤47👍12🔥8❤🔥5🕊4custom 54497596153465481863💯2
Signed Craig Maclachlan
💙🤑 GOOD MORNING FAMILY!
❤116🏆10👍10🎉6💯3
Signed Craig Maclachlan
🍀🏦 NEWBANK IS READY TO PRE-FLIP‼️ OPEN NEWBANK APP NOW OPEN NEWBANK APP NOW
🎉68❤41🔥11🤩6❤🔥4custom 54497596153465481861
Signed Craig Maclachlan
⛔️ THERE WILL BE NO CRYPTO CLARITY ACT. THE ONLY CLALRITY ACT WE NEED IS — STELLAR CLARITY ACT. Once that happens? Game OVER. LIQUIDITY is OURS.
🔥73❤42🏆17🙏10⚡5custom 54179240765030621113💯2
Signed Craig Maclachlan
👀 WHO SAW THE NEW APP UPDATE? 🔴 P2P PAYMENTS 🔴 WEEKLY LEADERBOARD REWARDS with the NEWBANK asset. 🔴 PUSH-UP NOTIFICATIONS 🔴 MODIFIED REFERRAL SYSTEM 🔴 SECURITY UPGRADE
🔥42❤22👍9😍7
Signed Craig Maclachlan
✔️ DONE. 50,000 XLM DISTRIBUTED to 982 NEWBANK users. ➕➕ XLM12 (347,347 units) 🎉🎉 CONGRATULATIONS.
🥰69❤47🔥40👍7custom 54179240765030621116custom 54629025202150024774🤩1😍1
Signed Craig Maclachlan
Let's make it 30,000 XLM 🔥 no.. 40.. 50 — 50,000 XLM TO YOU
❤62🔥17🕊11🙏7👍5
Signed Craig Maclachlan
🎉 Hey everyone, 🟢 We’ve been watching the dashboards light up these past few weeks, and honestly? It’s been pretty incredible to see how many of you have been leveling up your tiers and securing your positions. We’re building something here that’s bigger than just an app—we’re building your bridge to the next financial system. 🏦 Here’s the thing about NEWBANK: we didn’t just choose Stellar because it’s fast (though…
❤65🏆15custom 52492442352945919308🔥7🙏6👍4🎉3custom 54629025202150024771
Signed Craig Maclachlan
💥 HOWLY.. You guys really want that supply GONE. I'll leave it for 2 more hours. We only have 12k XLM remaining on NEWBANK. Let's finish it for a HUGE BONUS.
❤40🏆6❤🔥4👍2
Signed Craig Maclachlan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheNew_QFS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 944,418 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The New QFS” (@TheNew_QFS), 1,867 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheNew_QFS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.