3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 731–732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 09:22
731
-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:12
732
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:46
732
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
225.3%
avg views ÷ 731 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
13 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
21,409
Reactions total
374
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
374 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
195
52.1%
👍
80
21.4%
🔥
58
15.5%
🎉
19
5.08%
🙏
12
3.21%
🥰
10
2.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nasdaqstellarau. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
NASDAQ Family 💙🎉
The time you've been waiting for has arrived!
After a fully random selection from all eligible Tier 3 NPAY investors (1,000+ NPAY tokens), we have chosen the first 5 investors who will receive Early Access to the NPAY Card for testing. 💳✨
🎊 Congratulations to our selected investors!
🏆 @Huron54
GA6UJOSZ2HTNLQYQEJTW7IUI6UZTG5JMF3EODD3C3VD2DWKMBXCVCJQY
🏆 @DearGodPlease
GCLCRSOXY7RGAP47D6MNWKH52FHEN…
NASDAQ Family 💙🚀
We are excited to share that development is moving forward at an incredible pace.
Every day, we're getting closer to the next major milestone, and as many of you already know...
The next logical steps is liquidity. 💳
To help us prepare for that moment, we've decided to do something very special.
🎉 5 NPAY Card Early Access Testers 🎉
🎉 5 NPAY Card Early Access Testers 🎉
🎉 5 NPAY Card Early Acce…
NASDAQ Family 💙
🌐 The official NPAY website has just launched!
Use it to:
📲 Add all NPAY trustlines via QR codes or other supported methods.
📖 Learn more about the functionality, features, and purpose of the NPAY token.
We hope it makes getting started with NPAY easier than ever.
🔗 Visit now: https://nasdaqpay.org
NASDAQ Family 💙✨
We have some amazing news to share.
Something big is coming soon.
If you’re wondering what it’s about…
it’s connected to NPAY cards 💳
and early access ⚡
We’re getting closer to a phase many of you have been waiting for, and this will mark an important step forward.
More details very soon. Stay ready. 👀
NPAY Community 💙
We’re excited to share another major milestone in our NPAY ecosystem.
🎉 The NPAY Dividends have officially been revealed!
To celebrate, we've expanded the reward system from 3 currencies to 5:
🇺🇸 USD
🇪🇺 EUR
🇬🇧 GBP
🇦🇺 AUD
🇯🇵 JPY
And because this is a celebration of the latest milestone, we're introducing a limited-time event within the project!
✨ Special Community Event
For the next week, the r…
NASDAQ Family 💙
We are pleased to share an important improvement we have made across the NASDAQ ecosystem.
Over the past weeks, we have listened carefully to your feedback regarding missing dividends, trustline issues, and delayed reward processing. We know how important it is for these matters to be handled quickly and consistently.
As a result, we have implemented a new internal support process.
✅ Missing divid…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤
We have heard you.
💬 For months, the strongest request from our community has been simple:
When will rewards become usable?
When will liquidity become spendable?
When will investors finally be able to access what they have earned?
That is exactly why NPAY is being introduced.
💳 NPAY — The Bridge to Spendable Liquidity
Everything built until now was designed around the future financial network expec…
NASDAQ Family
We are happy to share that for the new ICO, we will soon begin a special NPAY Beta Testing phase.
To make sure everything works smoothly, we will be selecting a small handful of beta testers to help us test the new NPAY system. 🏆
All testers will be chosen from our existing investors, and everyone selected will be rewarded with salaries along with additional benefits.
Applications and submissions wi…
NASDAQ Family
We hear you.
We know what matters most right now: access, usability, and a clearer path toward spendable rewards.
That is why we have been working quietly behind the scenes on something new — a payment-focused step designed to bring the ecosystem closer to real-world use.
Simple. Practical. Powerful.
This is only a first look.
More details coming very soon. 👀
👍13🔥12❤9🎉2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nasdaqstellarau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 137,039 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NASDAQ STELLAR” (@nasdaqstellarau), 731 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasdaqstellarau.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.