Absolutely everyone here in the channel has been here for a year!

Channel
Telegram Open Network
@tonstellarnetwork
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
506subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002216298013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonstellarnetwork |
| Created | 22 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonstellarnetwork |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 506 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 505 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 506 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 506 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 56.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 1 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The funniest part is that he says we were hacked, but that’s not true. I even sent a transaction to Whip with the real Telegram accounts, yet he still chose to work with impostors!
💯2👍1
My Boss JFK Jr works with CZ. The other Binance guy Teng started on CZ ages ago.. I have Pavel in Devs Chat with FBI & USSS. These other accounts are linked to Ralph, Dmitri and The Extortion Ring. Teng just backed them. They can try play their retard games.
Don't be deceived, dear investors!
❤2
We have not been hacked by anyone. I sent transactions from our first project done in collaboration with him. The secret key will never be hacked by anyone!
❤3
Please share this with everyone who has invested here, tell them to sell everything before it's too late!
👍2
Please write to Whip @WhipLash3ty47 and ask him to unblock us so we can resolve this issue as soon as possible!
❤2👏2
Do not invest any money in this project. It’s a scam!
👏2❤1
‼️✈PROJECT ANNOUNCEMENT – BY PAVEL DUROV, FOUNDER & CEO OF TELEGRAM ✈‼️ ➡️In a world that is becoming increasingly hostile to personal privacy — where surveillance is growing, and attacks on digital freedom are escalating — Telegram will once again take the lead. 😇We are preparing to launch a project that will redefine what security means in the digital age.✅ 🌐➡️It is called Quantum Guardian Supercomputer — and it…
❤4
Hello, dear subscribers, My name is Pavel Durov, and I want to inform you not to invest in any project promoted on this Telegram channel https://t.me/QTelegramSecretP . It is run by an impostor, not the real Pavel Durov. Additionally, more than 5,000 people on the channel are bots, they aren’t real. Do not lose your money! I tried to talk about this with Whip, and my brother also tried, but he simply blocked both o…
❤1🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @tonstellarnetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Whiplash347 · 127,297
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram Open Network” (@tonstellarnetwork), 506 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonstellarnetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.