Channel
@WhipLash347CNNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002726914075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WhipLash347CNNews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 5 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WhipLash347CNNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 36 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 38 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 23.4% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 $XLM位列12种有望快速获批ETF的代币之一！🌟 Stellar重磅消息！根据Galaxy Digital的消息，在市值排名前100的代币中，只有12种可能符合SEC即将推出的快速通道ETF批准计划——而$XLM赫然在列。 📌 为什么这很重要： ✅ 目前SEC手中有91个ETF申请等待审批。 ✅ $XLM与SOL、ADA、XRP和LINK等重量级代币一同成为潜在的ETF领先者。 ✅ ETF的推出有望为Stellar带来大量机构资金，推动其在快速增长的RWA（现实世界资产）领域的应用。 🔥 Stellar已积极进军240亿美元的RWA市场，ETF上市可能成为下一轮大涨的催化剂。 👇 抢先掌握市场动态： 👑 t.me/Whiplash347 💥 t.me/WhipLash347CryptoNews 🇨🇳 @WhipLash347CNNews 🇷🇺 @WhipLash347RUNews 🇪🇸 @WhipLash34
❤1🎉1👍1🔥1
🚀 $XLM 看涨反转 —— 目标迈向 $1 📈 Stellar（$XLM）正在形成“倒头肩形态”——这是高时间框架中的经典看涨反转信号。 关键位置： ✅ 支撑位：$0.33（强力斐波那契0.618区域 & 抄底区域） ✅ 颈线位：$0.47–$0.50 ✅ 突破后的目标价：$0.68 → $0.83 → $0.95 → $1.00 📈 市场数据： ✅ 衍生品交易量上涨28% → 达到 $4.22亿 ✅ 未平仓合约持续上升 → 达到 $3.17亿 ✅ Binance 多空比：1.26 ✅ OKX 多空比：1.4 👉 尽管散户保持谨慎，但顶级交易者明显在布局多单。 清算数据显示空头正面临压力，表明市场动能正向多头倾斜。 ☑️ 如果 $XLM 守住 $0.33 支撑位，并成功突破 $0.50 的颈线位，通往 $1 的道路将畅通无阻。 大资金正在加速建仓，技术图表信号一致 —— Stellar 的突破只是时间问题。🚀…
❤1👍1🔥1🤩1
⭐️ $XLM 目标$0.45反弹，尽管面临阻力 💎 Stellar 的 XLM 在测试 $0.40 阻力位后保持稳定。尽管该代币一度跌至 $0.376，但很快反弹至 $0.384 —— 交易量超过 4 亿美元，显示出强劲的市场参与度。 📊 主要驱动因素： ✅ 由于新的加密基金申请，机构资金流入正在上升 🏦 ✅ VersaBank 确认其 USDVB 代币化存款将运行在 Stellar 上 🏦 ✅ 资金费率转为正值 ➡️ 交易者关注上涨动能 📈 ⚡️ 技术展望： ✅ 支撑位：$0.36–$0.38 ✅ ✅ 阻力位：$0.40，下一目标为 $0.45 🚀 ✅ 相对强弱指数（RSI）为 43 = 谨慎中略有改善 📊 💡 为何重要： 维持支撑并迅速反弹，可能增强机构信心，并巩固 Stellar 在现实世界应用中的角色。冲向 $0.45 以上的旅程或许才刚刚开始 🌍 👇 抢先掌握最新动态： 👑 t.me/Whiplash3…
❤1👍1🔥1🤩1
🔥🚨 $XLM 危机四伏 —— 但多头坚守阵地！🚨🔥 Stellar（$XLM）刚刚经历了24小时的过山车行情 🎢： ✅ 价格从 $0.398 暴跌至 $0.380 ❌ ✅ 成交量飙升 115%，达 $4.02 亿 📈 ✅ 出现大规模清算，但买盘如堡垒般守住 $0.380 🛡 ⚔️ 战场解析： ✅ 阻力墙在 $0.393 🧱 ✅ 支撑位在 $0.380 💪 ✅ 底部成交量达 9500 万枚代币 —— 需求强劲 🔥 尽管抛压沉重，XLM 顽强反弹至收盘价 $0.389，展现出强大韧性 🚀 🌍 一只新的美国加密 ETF 或将聚焦 Stellar，为其带来新的机构资本 🏦。 图表也显示 XLM 正在 $0.50 以下蓄势待发 —— 突破一触即发，交易员高度关注 👀 💡 巨鲸与机构之间的较量愈演愈烈 🐋。随着动能转移，下一次突破可能势不可挡！🚀 👇 把握市场先机： 👑 t.me/Whiplash347 💥 t.me/Wh…
❤1🎉1👍1🔥1
💥 Stellar $XLM 代币化正在改变游戏规则！🌍✨ Stellar 发展基金会（SDF）迈出了大胆的一步，投资了受英国监管的平台 Archax，推动现实世界资产（RWA）代币化的采用进入全新阶段。 🏦 Archax 已在 Stellar 上推出了代币化的阿伯丁货币市场基金。 📈 RWA 市场正在蓬勃发展 —— 从目前的 260 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将增长至 1 万亿美元！ ⚡️ Stellar 以其快速、低成本、全球化的区块链，为这一未来提供了可能。 为什么这很重要： ✅ 将房地产、债券、基金甚至艺术品带入区块链 ✅ 为机构与散户投资者开启新大门 ✅ 基于受英国金融行为监管局（FCA）监管的 Archax，建立在合规与信任之上 🌟 Stellar + Archax = 一场强强联手，连接传统金融与区块链革命。代币化的未来比以往任何时候都更接近我们！🚀💫 👇 把握先机，走在前沿： 👑 t.me/Whipl…
❤1👍1👏1🔥1
⚡️ Stellar $XLM – 正在测试支撑位，但机遇就在前方！🚀 在 7 月份经历了一波超过 +100% 的大涨（从 $0.25 ➝ $0.50 🎯）后，XLM 目前面临一些震荡，在跌破短期支撑线后，已下探至约 $0.426。📉 但重点在于 👉 报复性上涨后的回调是正常现象。眼下看似疲软的走势，实际上可能是在为下一波大涨做准备。🌊 🔥 关键信息： ✅ $XLM 在 7 月强势上涨 💥 ✅ 短期回调虽然看起来吓人 😬 但其实是健康的 ✅ 聪明资金往往会在下跌时进行布局 🏦 ✅ 长期基本面与应用持续增长 🌍 是的，图表显示 XLM 正在测试关键水平 ⚖️ —— 但 Stellar 的生态系统比以往更强大，历史也告诉我们，每一次回调都带来了新的增长机会。📊 👉 XLM 短期内可能在“薄冰”上行走 ❄️，但从更大的格局来看，仍保持看涨趋势。每一次下跌，都是 Stellar 下一轮上涨的发射台。🌟 👇 保持领先： 👑…
❤1👍1🔥1🤩1
💫 $XLM 与稳定币：引领 2500 亿美元的金融革命 🌍💵 稳定币已不再是小众工具 —— 它们正在彻底改变全球金融体系，而 Stellar（$XLM）正是这场变革的核心。🌟 📈 随着美国通过全新的 GENIUS 法案，稳定币市场迅速膨胀至 2500 亿美元。清晰的监管规则带来了信心，机构资金大举进入，采用速度前所未有地加快。🚀 为什么这对 $XLM 至关重要： 1️⃣ 真实世界的影响 🌐 – 在 Stellar 网络上，人们使用稳定币（如 USDC）进行日常支付、汇款和援助发放。 2️⃣ 即时且低成本 ⚡️ – Stellar 网络让跨境支付几乎零费用、极速到账。 3️⃣ 出入金通道 💳 – 借助 Stellar 与 MoneyGram 的合作，任何人都能在全球范围内实现稳定币与现金的兑换。 4️⃣ 下一代金融 🔗 – 从代币化债券（Etherfuse）到可生息资产，Stellar 正在驱动“稳定币 2.0”时代。 …
👍2❤1🔥1🤩1
🚀 为 Stellar $XLM 带来下一代多链动力！ ⭐️ 重大里程碑：NEAR Intents 现已支持 @StellarOrg 🎉 💡 这意味着什么？ 通过这次升级，用户现在可以从 20 多条链、100 多种代币 直接交换到 Stellar，包括： ✨ BTC ✨ ETH ✨ SOL ✨ XRP ✅ 无需跨链桥 ✅ 无需封装代币 ✅ 无需多次跳转 只需一次请求 → 无缝体验 ⚡️ 🌐 为什么重要？ 跨链桥一直是安全性和用户体验的薄弱环节。 现在，多亏了 NEAR Intents，多链的未来是以“意图”为驱动的 —— 更顺畅、更快速、更安全。 🔥 这将为 Stellar 应用、DeFi 和全球采用打开巨大的潜力。 开发者只需一次集成，就能将数十个生态系统中的流动性和用户直接引入 Stellar。 多链革命已经到来 —— Stellar 处于核心位置！ 🌟 👇 走在前沿： 👑 t.me/Whiplash347 💥…
❤1👍1🔥1🤩1
🚀 Stellar（$XLM）即将突破！💫 📊 XLM 图表上正在形成一个经典的反向头肩形态——这是最可靠的看涨形态之一！目前价格🔹正徘徊在关键阻力位 $0.50 以下。 🔥 如果能够强势突破这一关口，XLM 有望冲向 $0.77 ——这是上一个市场周期高点以来从未见过的价格！📈 💡 为什么这很重要： 🪙 $0.77 是该形态的目标测量涨幅 📈 如果有大量成交量支撑，潜在涨势强劲 🌍 Stellar 正持续拓展其在跨境支付和金融科技领域的合作伙伴关系 ⚠️ 注意突破确认 📊 ——放量突破并成功回踩支撑，或将成为多头进场的信号！ ✨ 技术面与基本面双双利好，XLM 有望成为下一轮市场行情中的领头羊之一！🚀 👇 抢先掌握市场动向： 👑 t.me/Whiplash347 💥 t.me/WhipLash347CryptoNews 🇨🇳 @WhipLash347CNNews 🇷🇺 @WhipLash347RUNews 🇪…
❤1🎉1👍1🔥1
🚀 Stellar（$XLM）迈入主流舞台 —— BitPay 扩大全球加密支付版图！🌍💳 💡 BitPay —— 全球最大的加密支付处理商之一 —— 正在持续扩展其版图，新增多条区块链网络，而 Stellar（$XLM）依旧是其支付生态系统中的关键角色。 ⁉️ 最新动态： 🔹 Solana 加入阵容，支持 SOL、USDC 和 USDT —— 为用户提供更多支付选项。 🔹 Stellar（$XLM）已与 Visa、Avalanche 和 Ethereum 一同整合。 🔹 极速交易和极低手续费，使这些网络在全球结算中保持领先地位。 🏦 重磅合作伙伴： Visa ✅ | Fiserv ✅ | Stellar ✅ | Avalanche ✅ | Solana ✅ Stellar 越来越多地被选用于稳定币交易和跨境支付 —— 从零售品牌到全球银行皆然。 🔥 随着集成不断增加，$XLM 正在持续巩固其作为顶级支付区块链的地位，为…
❤1🎉1👍1🔥1
🚀 Stellar（$XLM）势头强劲 —— $1 目标近在眼前！ 🌟 📈 $XLM 本周已飙升近 +15%，在山寨币乐观情绪和 XRP 最近上涨的推动下，当前交易价格约为 $0.45，正突破关键阻力位，或将引发一轮大规模牛市。🐂 🎯 关键目标： ✔️ 第一站：$0.64 📊 ✔️ 突破区：$1 💥 ✔️ 长期牛市目标：$10 🌕 📊 RSI（相对强弱指数）为 59.57 —— 仍有大量上涨空间，尚未进入超买区间，同时交易量持续上升。势头明显倾向 Stellar。📈 💡 XLM vs XRP： 当前市值为 138.2 亿美元 的 Stellar 正快速追赶。未来有可能超越 XRP 吗？图表显示山寨币排名可能即将洗牌。🔄 ⚡️ 如果当前的动能持续，$XLM 或将成为本轮牛市的顶级表现币种之一 —— $1 里程碑可能比预期更早到来！💎 👇 保持领先： 👑 t.me/Whiplash347 💥 t.me/WhipLash…
❤2👍1🔥1🤩1
📊 XLM 价格预测：是什么推动 $XLM 上涨或下跌？🚀 Stellar（$XLM）不仅仅是另一种山寨币 —— 它是跨境支付和金融普惠的重要角色。但是什么真正驱动了 XLM 的价格？我们一起来看看 👇 🔧 实用性 = 价值 XLM 在 Stellar 网络上被用于处理交易的次数越多，对它的需求就越大。📈 👉 企业在现实世界中的采用 = 提振价格！ 📈 市场趋势很重要 当比特币和以太坊上涨或下跌时，XLM 通常也会跟随。 加密市场的宏观走势决定了整体节奏 🎢 💬 社区与市场情绪 合作伙伴关系、系统升级和正面新闻 = 🔥 FUD（恐惧、不确定和怀疑）和市场恐慌 = 😬 Stellar 拥有强大的社区，有助于增强信心。 🛠 技术发展 网络升级使交易更快、更便宜、更安全 = 对 XLM 看涨 别忘了：Stellar 正在不断扩大与银行的整合 🏦 ⚖️ 监管观察 有利的监管政策 = 更多采用 ✅ 严格监管打压 = 遭遇阻力 …
🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WhipLash347CNNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WhipLash347CNNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇨🇳 WHIPLASH347 新闻” (@WhipLash347CNNews), 36 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhipLash347CNNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.