https://x.com/i/spaces/1kKzDDYeZLrJv

Channel
Build on Stellar
@BuildOnStellar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
826subscribers
-1,042 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001502828386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BuildOnStellar |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BuildOnStellar |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 826 | -155 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 981 | -212 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 1,193 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 1,198 | -84 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 1,282 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,283 | -109 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,392 | -300 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 1,692 | -33 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,725 | -47 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,772 | -89 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 1,861 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 1,862 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 1,868 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 1,868 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
If you have an idea worth building, build it on Stellar. Indicate your interest: https://t.co/eQcWTK29wa
👍1
And when you're ready for your next venture, SCF is still behind you. Top-performing SCF alum can qualify for follow-on awards up to a $150,000 lifetime total, with higher caps on a case-by-case basis.
Mainnet isn't the finish line. Teams that hit mainnet can move into Growth Hack, an eight-week program on user acquisition and retention, with liquidity support and a route to SDF marketing and investment matching beyond it.
Then you build with real infrastructure behind you. Funding lands in four tranches as you clear milestones, the Audit Bank covers your security audit, and UX review and user testing sharpen the product. Three to six months later, you're live on mainnet.
The RFP Track means demand secured before your first commit. Every quarter, delegates publish specific tools and infra Stellar wants built, with funding attached. You choose one, win it, and start building for a customer that already exists.
From there, a Build Award takes it further. Pitch something novel on the Open Track, bring Stellar's building blocks into your product on Integration, or claim an RFP and build what the ecosystem needs.
It starts the moment your idea is real. Ambassador chapters identify promising ideas early through Instawards: fast, targeted capital for teams with a clearly scoped plan worth backing before the full Build process begins.
Have an idea worth building? Stellar can carry it from validated concept to funded, audited, live on mainnet, and scaling, with capital and support at every stage along the way. Here's what that path actually looks like.
👍1
Institutions use blockchain because it makes their operations better, period. At Stellar House São Paulo, @FTDA_US SVP Mike Reed explained why Franklin Templeton leverages the Stellar network.
👍1
Blink and you'll miss it. Unless you've been paying attention. https://x.com/i/status/2085431506286108906
👍1
🔐 $E STAKING — DEVELOPMENT UPDATE Many have been asking: “Are we ready for E Staking yet?” The answer: It is currently in the development and testing phase. 🛠️ We are ensuring that the staking process operates securely, transparently, and verifiably on the Stellar network. 🧪 During the testing phase, the community will be able to participate with a very small amount of $E once testing opens. 💰 MARKET UPDATE To …
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BuildOnStellar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@QuantumStellarInitiative · 32,102
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 September 2026
@veloupdates · 156,600
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@Whiplash347 · 124,162
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Build on Stellar” (@BuildOnStellar), 826 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BuildOnStellar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.