Channel
@WhipLash347CryptoNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
514subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002407191135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WhipLash347CryptoNews |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WhipLash347CryptoNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 514 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 516 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 516 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
198 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 38.9% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 22.7% | |
| 🎉 | 13 | 6.57% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.04% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 $XLM Among 12 Tokens Set for Fast-Track ETF Approval! 🌟 Big news for Stellar! According to Galaxy Digital, only 12 out of the top 100 tokens may qualify for the SEC’s upcoming fast-track ETF approval plan — and $XLM is on that exclusive list. 📌 Why it matters: ✅ 91 ETF requests are waiting at the SEC. ✅ $XLM joins heavyweights like SOL, ADA, XRP, and LINK as potential ETF frontrunners. ✅ ETFs could un…
❤5👍4🎉3🔥2
🚀 $XLM Bullish Reversal – Path Toward $1 📈 Stellar $XLM is forming an inverse head & shoulders pattern — a classic bullish reversal on higher timeframes. Key Levels: ✅ Support: $0.33 (strong Fibonacci 0.618 zone & buy-the-dip region) ✅ Neckline: $0.47–$0.50 ✅ Targets after breakout: $0.68 → $0.83 → $0.95 → $1.00 📈 Market Data: ✅ Derivatives volume up 28% → $422M ✅ Open interest rising → $317M…
❤4🤩2🎉1👍1🔥1
⭐️ $XLM Eyes $0.45 Rally Despite Resistance 💎 Stellar’s XLM is holding steady after testing the $0.40 resistance. While the token slipped to $0.376, it quickly rebounded to $0.384 — with trading volumes above $400M, showing strong market participation. 📊 Key Drivers: ✅ Institutional flows rising thanks to new crypto fund filings 🏦 ✅ VersaBank confirms its USDVB tokenized deposits will run on Stellar 🏦 ✅ F…
👍4❤3🔥1🥰1
🔥🚨 $XLM Under Fire – But Bulls Hold the Line! 🚨🔥 Stellar $XLM just went through a 24h rollercoaster 🎢: ✅ Price crashed from $0.398 → $0.380 ❌ ✅ Volume exploded +115% 📈 to $402M ✅ Massive liquidation hit, but buyers defended $0.380 like a fortress 🛡 ⚔️ Battlefield Breakdown: ✅ Resistance wall at $0.393 🧱 ✅ Support bunker at $0.380 💪 ✅ 95M tokens traded at the floor — proving strong demand 🔥…
❤5👍2🔥2👏1
💥 Stellar $XLM Tokenization is Changing the Game! 🌍✨ The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) has made a bold move by investing in UK-regulated platform Archax, pushing the adoption of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) to the next level. 🏦 Archax has already launched a tokenized Aberdeen money market fund on Stellar. 📈 The RWA market is booming — from $26B today to a projected $1 TRILLION by 2030! ⚡️ Stellar’s fast…
❤4🔥4👍2👏1
⚡️ Stellar $XLM – Testing Support, But Opportunity Ahead! 🚀 After a massive +100% July rally (from $0.25 ➝ $0.50 🎯), XLM is now facing some turbulence, dropping to around $0.426 after breaking below its short-term support line. 📉 But here’s the thing 👉 pullbacks are normal after parabolic moves. What looks like weakness today could actually be setting the stage for the next big wave upward. 🌊 🔥 Key insights: …
❤4👍3🔥2🤩1
💫 $XLM & Stablecoins: Powering a $250B Revolution 🌍💵 Stablecoins aren’t niche anymore — they’re transforming global finance, and Stellar $XLM is at the heart of it. 🌟 📈 With the new GENIUS Act in the US, the stablecoin market exploded to $250B. Clear rules brought confidence, institutions jumped in, and adoption is accelerating like never before. 🚀 Why this matters for $XLM: 1️⃣ Real-world impact 🌐 – On Stellar, p…
❤5🔥4👍2🤩2
🚀 Next-Level Multichain Power for Stellar $XLM ! ⭐️ Big milestone: NEAR Intents now supports @StellarOrg 🎉 💡 What does it mean? With this upgrade, users can now swap directly into Stellar from 20+ chains and 100+ tokens — including: ✨ BTC ✨ ETH ✨ SOL ✨ XRP ✅ No bridges ✅ No wrappers ✅ No extra hops Just one request → one seamless experience ⚡️ 🌐 Why it matters: Bridges have always been a weak point for security a…
❤4🔥3👍2🎉1👏1
🚀 Stellar $XLM Poised for a Breakout! 💫 📊 A classic inverse head & shoulders is forming on XLM’s chart — one of the most reliable bullish patterns! Right now, the price 🔹 is hovering just below the key resistance at $0.50. 🔥 A decisive break above this level could open the door to $0.77 — a price we haven’t seen since the previous market cycle highs! 📈 💡 Why this matters: 🪙 $0.77 is the measured move target f…
❤4👍2🔥2👏1
🚀 Stellar $XLM Joins the Big Leagues — BitPay Expands Global Crypto Payments! 🌍💳 💡 BitPay — one of the world’s largest crypto payment processors — keeps expanding its reach, adding new blockchains while Stellar ($XLM) remains a key player in its payment ecosystem. ⁉️ What’s New: 🔹 Solana joins the lineup with support for SOL, USDC, and USDT — giving users more payment options. 🔹 Stellar $XLM is already integrated a…
🔥4❤2👍2🎉1
🚀 Stellar $XLM Gains Momentum – $1 Target Now on the Horizon! 🌟 📈 $XLM has surged nearly +15% this week, riding the wave of altcoin optimism and XRP’s recent rally. Trading now around $0.45, Stellar is breaking key resistance levels and setting up for a potential massive bull run. 🐂 🎯 Key Targets: ✔️ First stop: $0.64 📊 ✔️ Breakout zone: $1 💥 ✔️ Long-term bull cycle goal: $10 🌕 📊 RSI sits at 59.57 – s…
❤3👍2🔥2🎉1
📊 XLM Price Prediction: What Drives $XLM Up or Down? 🚀 Stellar ($XLM) is not just another altcoin — it’s a key player in cross-border payments and financial inclusion. But what actually moves the price of XLM? Let’s break it down 👇 🔧 Utility = Value The more XLM is used to power transactions on the Stellar network, the more demand it gets. 📈 👉 Real-world adoption by businesses = price boost! 📈 Market Trends Matter…
❤4🎉1👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WhipLash347CryptoNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 554,447 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WhipLash347CryptoNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WhipLash347 NEWS” (@WhipLash347CryptoNews), 514 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhipLash347CryptoNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.