Это тестовый канал криптокабана, мы меняем название и временно привязались старое сюда, не обращайте внимания. Наш канал доступн по ссылке @TheCryptoBoar
😁15👏1
Channel
@NOT_mining
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
218subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139666170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NOT_mining |
| Description | В |
| Created | 5 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NOT_mining |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 218 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 218 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
23 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 15 | 65.2% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2024 to 9 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это тестовый канал криптокабана, мы меняем название и временно привязались старое сюда, не обращайте внимания. Наш канал доступн по ссылке @TheCryptoBoar
😁15👏1
Live stream finished (54 seconds)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (16 seconds)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (32 seconds)
Live stream started
Мультичек на 3 TON ($6.31). Сумма одного чека: 0.01 TON ($0.02) Количество активаций: 300
👍2
Сегодня мы обсудим новый Airdrop от выдающегося проекта NEAR Protocol. Сразу скажу, что Airdrop уже подтвержден, и его пропускать точно никому не советую. Я лично участвую в нем очень активно. Я в принудиельном порядке подсадил на это приложение всех своих знакомых, даже тех, кто раньше обходил тему крипты стороной. Как можно начать собирать до 100 токенов HOT прямо сейчас и сколько на этом можно заработать? Многи…
👍1
Это свидетельствует о высоком уровне команды проекта и их оперативном взаимодействии с биржами, что обещает успешный листинг и возможность зафиксировать прибыль. Airdrop по своей сути очень похож на те, что проводились четыре года назад, на том же рыночном цикле. Тогда, например, кошелек Trust Wallet раздавал по 100 токенов просто за установку приложения, а приглашение друзей увеличивало заработок до 1 000 долларов. …
👍2
Сколько можно заработать на этом? Ваш доход будет зависеть от количества участников, размера средств, выделенных командой на Airdrop, и капитализации монеты после ее выхода на биржу. Не менее важным фактором является текущая фаза рынка. Я уверен, что разработчики сделают все возможное, чтобы листинг состоялся в наиболее благоприятное для рынка время. Поэтому назвать конкретную сумму невозможно, но для человека, котор…
🚀 Новости для участников канала! 🚀 Отправил немножко TON и NEAR нашим дорогим майнерам, все скрины, разумеется, не уместились. Как получать такие выплаты? Все просто: 1. Регулярно читать публикации и информацию, которая в них появляется. 2. Быть частью нашего сообщества. 3. Быть частью сквадов нашего канала, мы активно участвуем в следующих проектах: - Присоединиться к добыче HOT 👊 - Наша деревня в HOT 👊 - Тут про…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @NOT_mining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 699,867 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NOT_mining named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал” (@NOT_mining), 218 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NOT_mining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.