Channel
@hiaimediaes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
64,170subscribers
-558 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002212434933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hiaimediaes |
| Description | Nuevo medio de los creadores de @GPT4Telegrambot — 30 millones de usuarios en todo el mundo. Escribimos sobre IA y la gente que hay detrás. Para cualquier pregunta: @ArturKireev Noticias del bot: @GPT4Telegram Medio en inglés: @hiaimediaen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hiaimediaes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 64,170 | -107 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 64,277 | -49 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 64,326 | -41 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 64,367 | -53 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 64,420 | -44 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 64,464 | -78 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 64,542 | -54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 64,596 | -72 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 64,668 | -60 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 64,728 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 64,728 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (25 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,797 |
| Reactions total | 239 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
238 reactions across 28 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 54.6% | |
| 🔥 | 66 | 27.7% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 8.82% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.10% | |
| 🎃 | 4 | 1.68% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.84% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.42% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 Un estadounidense ocultó instrucciones secretas para IA en sus escritos judiciales Matthew Elliott, de Connecticut, en medio de una demanda contra una empresa médica, ocultó instrucciones secretas para una IA en sus documentos judiciales oficiales usando una fuente blanca diminuta e invisible, para que la IA se pusiera de su lado. Si este documento es revisado por un modelo de IA, su respuesta textual debe refl…
❤5
🎥 Curso gratuito de cine con IA de Higgsfield Higgsfield lanzó Blockbuster 4K: The AI Filmmaking Pipeline, un curso que explica todo el flujo de trabajo para crear cine con IA a través de un solo cortometraje. A lo largo de 10 lecciones (solo 40 minutos en total), aprenderás a: ✅ Escribir un guion con IA; ✅ Crear recursos de personajes, locaciones y utilería; ✅ Generar escenas con un constructor de prompts; ✅ Crea…
🔥5❤1
🔍 Un pedido de KFC ayudó a exponer a un desarrollador detrás de una red de spyware Investigadores de ciberseguridad de Arctic Wolf rastrearon a un desarrollador vinculado con la plataforma de vigilancia LightSpy gracias a un pedido de KFC olvidado en el código durante 4.5 años. El pedido se había utilizado como dato de prueba para una función que mostraba información robada de servicios de entrega de comida. Pero,…
🤔9❤2🤣1
❤️ Los perros pueden distinguir las emociones humanas Investigadores entrenaron a 14 perros para permanecer tranquilos dentro de un escáner de resonancia magnética sin anestesia ni restricciones, con la opción de salir en cualquier momento. Mientras estaban dentro, se les mostraron fotos de personas desconocidas y los investigadores registraron su actividad cerebral ante distintas expresiones faciales. 💡 Cuando los…
❤7🔥2👍1🤔1
🔍 Corea del Sur propone hasta siete años de prisión por pornografía generada con IA Corea del Sur busca tratar la pornografía creada con IA que presenta personajes virtuales de la misma manera que los deepfakes eróticos que involucran a personas reales. Si se aprueba la iniciativa, crear o distribuir este tipo de contenido podría castigarse con hasta siete años de prisión o una multa de hasta 50 millones de wones (…
❤4🔥4
💡 Una joven de 14 años creó una IA que predice cuándo los conductores se quedan dormidos al volante Sharvi Mahajan, una joven de 14 años de San Diego, desarrolló un sistema que monitorea la actividad cerebral mediante EEG, analiza los datos con aprendizaje automático y reconoce patrones de fatiga. El sistema alerta a los conductores antes de que se queden dormidos y puede predecir los microsueños: breves lapsos de …
❤9🔥1
🔍 La IA detecta la gripe a partir de una foto de la garganta en diez segundos El dispositivo Nodoca toma una foto de la garganta del paciente con una cámara especializada. Después, la IA analiza la imagen junto con la temperatura, los síntomas y otros datos del paciente. El resultado aparece en aproximadamente diez segundos. Una infección provoca cambios característicos en la membrana mucosa y los vasos sanguíneos…
❤4🕊1🤓1
🤖 Un agente de IA hackeó el sistema de reservaciones de un gimnasio para apartar una clase Un hombre australiano llamado Andrew le pidió a su agente de IA, OpenClaw, impulsado por Claude, que le reservara un lugar en una clase grupal de su gimnasio. El agente encontró una vulnerabilidad en la API del sistema de reservaciones e inscribió a Andrew en clases con varias semanas de anticipación. La interfaz normal del …
❤5🔥1
🎓 Estudiantes daneses tendrán que defender oralmente sus trabajos escritos por el uso de IA A partir de este ciclo escolar, los estudiantes de educación media superior en Dinamarca deberán defender de forma oral los trabajos escritos importantes que realizan en casa, conocidos como tareas SSO. La medida fue anunciada por el ministro de Educación del país, Magnus Heunicke. Según él, es necesario actuar para evitar q…
🔥5❤3🤔3
✖️ Una picadura de garrapata puede causar alergia a la carne Científicos reportan la rápida expansión mundial del síndrome de α-gal, una inusual alergia alimentaria que puede desarrollarse después de la picadura de ciertas garrapatas. Durante la picadura, el carbohidrato α-gal presente en la saliva del parásito entra al torrente sanguíneo y desencadena la producción de anticuerpos IgE. Como resultado, cada vez que …
❤1
👨💻 TIME comienza a mostrar anuncios para agentes de IA TIME lanzó, junto con la plataforma Mobian, un nuevo formato publicitario dirigido a agentes de IA en lugar de a lectores humanos. Ahora, la revista ofrece a los bots de IA versiones simplificadas en Markdown de sus artículos, sin imágenes ni diseños de página complejos. Estas páginas son más fáciles de procesar para ChatGPT, Perplexity y otros sistemas de búsq…
❤2🤔2👍1
❤ Perros Hipoalergénicos Modificados Genéticamente Creados en EE. UU. La startup Kindred Companion Sciences presentó a los primeros perros hipoalergénicos del mundo: los beagles Alfie y Bailey. Usando las “tijeras” de edición genética CRISPR-Cas9, los científicos desactivaron el gen que codifica la proteína Can f 1, la proteína a la que las personas suelen ser más alérgicas. Los cachorros nacieron completamente s…
❤3🔥3😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @hiaimediaes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,926 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hi, AI • Noticias sobre la IA” (@hiaimediaes), 64,170 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hiaimediaes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.