Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 491,478–493,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
491,695
-4
12 Aug 2026, 21:34
491,699
-21
12 Aug 2026, 19:13
491,720
-270
12 Aug 2026, 00:42
491,990
-3
11 Aug 2026, 23:52
491,993
-91
11 Aug 2026, 19:25
492,084
-48
11 Aug 2026, 16:26
492,132
-251
11 Aug 2026, 00:05
492,383
-9
10 Aug 2026, 22:25
492,392
-4
10 Aug 2026, 21:42
492,396
-89
10 Aug 2026, 16:12
492,485
-106
10 Aug 2026, 01:21
492,591
-20
9 Aug 2026, 20:11
492,611
+4
9 Aug 2026, 19:58
492,607
-98
9 Aug 2026, 12:37
492,705
-73
9 Aug 2026, 01:51
492,778
+24
8 Aug 2026, 18:02
492,754
-5
8 Aug 2026, 17:40
492,759
-58
8 Aug 2026, 12:01
492,817
-13
8 Aug 2026, 02:55
492,830
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.96%
avg views ÷ 491,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
49,000
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.108%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
24 (8 June 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
636,710
Reactions total
688
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,757 reactions across 24 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,348
76.7%
👍
198
11.3%
🔥
47
2.68%
👏
44
2.50%
👎
22
1.25%
🥰
19
1.08%
👌
11
0.626%
💯
11
0.626%
🥱
11
0.626%
🤔
10
0.569%
🤓
9
0.512%
🤣
7
0.398%
👀
6
0.341%
🤩
5
0.285%
🎉
3
0.171%
😁
3
0.171%
🤨
3
0.171%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,757reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 24 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peliculas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🍿 El blockbuster de verano que no le debe nada a ninguna franquicia
📆 Estreno: 14 de agosto de 2026
🎭 Género: #CienciaFicción · #Thriller · #Aventura
✈️ Añadir película
Un evento cósmico arranca Oak Street de los años 80 y la planta en un lugar lleno de dinosaurios. Suena a disparate, y lo es. Pero con David Robert Mitchell al volante (el mismo de It Follows) me fío del caos controlado.
Anne Hathaway y Ewan McGreg…
🍿 La odisea de Nolan ya supera los 1.000 millones... y China ni ha abierto la taquilla
📆 Estreno: 17 de julio de 2026
🎭 Género: #Épica · #Aventura · #Drama
✈️ Añadir película
Christopher Nolan ha cruzado los mil millones sin China en cartelera. Semanas de IMAX agotado, servidores de venta colapsando, filas que aguantan tres semanas. Eso no es marketing; es gravedad.
Y luego está Robert Pattinson, que ya es meme vi…
🍿 Bad Lieutenant: Tokyo, o cómo Miike convierte una franquicia maldita en una bomba de relojería
📆 Estreno: Próximamente
🎭 Género: #Crimen · #Drama · #CineNegro
✈️ Añadir película
La saga Bad Lieutenant funciona por acumulación de caos: Abel Ferrara con Keitel en 1992, Werner Herzog con Cage en 'Teniente corrupto' en 2009. Ahora Takashi Miike toma el relevo y me parece la elección más loca y perfecta posible.
Miik…
🍿 Spider-Man acaba de reescribir la historia del cine
📆 Estreno: 29 de julio de 2025
🎭 Género: #Acción · #Aventuras · #Superhéroes
✈️ Añadir película
360 millones en EE.UU., superando a 'Vengadores: Endgame'. Tom Holland lleva cuatro pelis creciendo en taquilla, sin ajuste de inflación, sin red.
Destin Daniel Cretton ha tomado el arco más íntimo de la saga (Peter sin recuerdos, sin MJ) y lo ha convertido en el may…
🍿 El sicario devoto. Mahershala Ali se inventa su propia película de acción
📆 Estreno: 25 de septiembre de 2026
🎭 Género: #Acción #Drama #Thriller
✈️ Añadir película
Mahershala Ali lleva siete años esperando a que Marvel arrancase su Blade. No arrancó. Así que él y el director Bassam Tariq (los dos habían empezado a trabajar juntos en ese reboot) decidieron hacer algo propio: Your Mother Your Mother Your Mother, un…
🍿Wicker: Alexander Skarsgård convertido en marido de mimbre y, oye, me intriga
📆 Estreno: 30 de octubre de 2026
🎭 Género: #Comedia · #Fantasía · #Romance
✈️ Añadir película
Una pescadora medieval maloliente encarga al cestero del pueblo un marido hecho de mimbre. Suena a delirio de madrugada, pero el tráiler lo vende con una seguridad pasmosa. Olivia Colman con esa cara de resignación cómica suya es garantía sufici…
🍿El Coyote, Sísifo y el mejor póster del año
📆 Estreno: 28 de agosto de 2026
🎭 Género: #Animación · #Comedia
✈️ Añadir película
Un coyote empujando su propia bomba cuesta arriba, como Sísifo con su roca. Me compra sin reservas. Hay más filosofía existencialista en esa imagen que en años de marketing de animación vacío.
La película llega con Will Forte como abogado de oficio y John Cena de villano corporativo. La d…
🎬Todd McFarlane lleva años "a punto" de terminar la peli animada de Spawn
"Casi lista" significa que tiene voces, storyboard y poco más. Keith David repite como Spawn y Mark Hamill se suma como Twitch. Casting impecable para algo que, literalmente, todavía no tiene animación.
McFarlane lleva prometiendo el live action desde 2021, sin guion aprobado. El hombre ama su personaje tanto que prefiere dejarlo en un cajón …
🎬 Ryan Gosling como Ghost Rider: la manifestación más cara de la historia del cine
📆 Estreno: 2028
🎭 Género: #Acción · #Superhéroes · #Marvel
Llevaba años diciéndolo en entrevistas y resultó que no era hype vacío. Ryan Gosling quería ser Ghost Rider y fue a buscarlo él mismo. Eso me compra bastante: los proyectos que nacen de obsesión genuina suelen tener otra energía. Y tener a Shawn Levy en la silla de dirección …
🍿 El cubo de palomitas ya no es el cubo de palomitas
AMC espera ingresar más de 100 millones solo con recipientes coleccionables este año. El doble que en 2023. El modelo es brutal..., merchandising que paga el alquiler cuando las entradas apenas dan.
El ataúd metálico de 'Nosferatu' o el facehugger de 'Alien: Romulus' tienen algo de gracia. El problema llega cuando la calidad cae y el cubo es plástico barato con u…
❤39🤓1
Signed garcia
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @peliculas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 567,379 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“películas y series 🍿” (@peliculas), 491,695 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peliculas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.