Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Geekdegafas

Channel

Geekdegafas

@Geekdegafas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,774subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008591515
TypeChannel
Username@Geekdegafas
Description📱 Tu canal de tecnología favorito https://www.youtube.com/@GeekdegafasYT El canal puede incluir publicaciones con enlaces de afiliados.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Geekdegafas

Growth

7,7747,8037,788.56 August 2026 — 7,803 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,803 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,795 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,783 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,778 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,779 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,774 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,770–7,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 16:597,774-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:157,777-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:527,779+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:337,778-5
13 Aug 2026, 06:577,783-12
10 Aug 2026, 00:567,795-8
6 Aug 2026, 19:507,803no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:347,803first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 7,774 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held41 (24 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total53,323
Reactions total988
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,620
Videos
251
Links
22,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,055 reactions across 35 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
43441.1%
👍33231.5%
🔥918.63%
👏747.01%
🤣282.65%
🤔242.27%
🆒121.14%
😨121.14%
🤬80.758%
🤩70.664%
🥴70.664%
🙊40.379%
🍾30.284%
😍30.284%
😢30.284%
😱30.284%
👌20.19%
🥰20.19%
❤‍🔥10.095%
🏆10.095%
4 further kinds40.379%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,070reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC392 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Sony ha presentado un "nuevo" teléfono. Es el Xperia 10 VIII y... no sé, me quedo sin palabras. Conócelo aquí: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9A9ffn2JXQ

👍4🤔2😨1

24 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC769 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Pues... Os tengo que hablar de los Galaxy S27 y el Exynos 2700. Forma parte del vídeo de noticias de esta semana: https://youtu.be/uxGL_TnZMIs?t=225&si=ERqUgxvTOGUUUQ0f

5👍3😐1

24 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC792 views24 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Huawei... ¡OTRA VEZ HUAWEI! Y ya van muchas en los últimos años. El nuevo dispositivo de la compañía china llega este mes y podría ser la auténtica sensación para los que buscan algo fresco y diferente. Es una de las 6 noticias. Vídeo disponible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxGL_TnZMIs

15👍8🤣1

21 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Puede parecer fácil responder a esta pregunta, pero, si lo piensas bien, la respuesta tiene 5 letras: NADIE. ¿Quién podrá derrotar y superar a Apple y Samsung? Vídeo disponible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIUQp8tHzbY

👍11🤣31

20 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,470 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

En 10 días Nintendo Switch 2 subirá su precio hasta los 499€. Así que, si no tienes la tuya, ahora es el momento: https://amzn.to/3ULlkOH (Link afiliado).

🤣10🔥4🆒2👍1👏1

20 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,390 views18 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

En menos de un mes tendré en mis manos el nuevo iPhone 18 Pro Max. Eso sí, hay varias cosas que debes tener en cuenta. Y creo que alguna no te va a gustar en absoluto. De hecho, es por eso que voy por el grande y no el compacto. Vídeo disponible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBawCWiQBtY

👍153

19 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,320 views21 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Cada año aparecen varios aspirantes al trono de Android, solo unos pocos llegan dispuestos a cambiar las reglas. Hoy descubriremos si el Pixel 11 Pro es una decepción, un gran teléfono… o el nuevo rey. Análisis ya disponible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG2vgkvS66E

👍12🔥63

19 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,190 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Se adelanta el vídeo una hora. Sale en breves.

👍7🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,250 views31 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Hoy hay análisis. El más largo del año. 24 minutos de pura tecnología. Tenéis mi palabra de que merecerá la pena del principio a final. 🇪🇸 19:00 🇮🇨 🇵🇹 18:00 🇦🇷 🇺🇾 🇧🇷 14:00 🇺🇸 🇨🇱 🇨🇺 🇵🇾 🇨🇦 🇧🇴 🇵🇷 🇻🇪 13:00 🇪🇨 🇵🇪 🇵🇦 🇲🇽 🇩🇴 🇨🇴 12:00 🇳🇮 🇨🇷 🇬🇹 🇧🇿 🇭🇳 🇸🇻 11:00

👍237🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,300 views20 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Samsung debe cambiar, ya que hay cosas que son insostenibles. Pero... un rayo de luz está empezando a brillar cada vez más y es posible que en 2027 veamos una ¿nueva? Samsung. Te lo cuento todo aquí: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBqLB1LGCWs

15👍4🤩1

17 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,390 views12 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

En el vídeo de noticias de esta semana os hablo de muchas cositas, pero los protagonistas son los Poco F9 Series y el precio que podrían tener... ¡Prepara la cartera! Ya disponible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMO_2rAhR8k

🔥7😨3👍2

17 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,350 views19 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Es muy probable que el iPhone 17 suba de precio con la llegada de los iPhone 18 Pro. La escasez de memorias va a pasar factura. Además, parece que no habrá iPhone 18 hasta 2027. Por tanto, es un momento perfecto para comprar tú iPhone en K-tuin: http://et3.etr.im/Ctbb #publi

16👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Geekdegafas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,573,741 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Noticias de Telegram
@TelegramES · 147,676
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
FERCH TECH
@ferchtech · 100,742
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
Xataka
@xataka · 49,508
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Tips de Telegram
@TelegramTipsES · 1,528,681
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geekdegafas” (@Geekdegafas), 7,774 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geekdegafas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.