TRUMP STILL WANTS TO BUY MORE BITCOIN FOR U.S. STRATEGIC RESERVE — PATRICK WITT "There has been a lot of discussion about how we might be able to do that." @BlackBlockMarkets

Channel
Black Block Markets
@BlackBlockMarkets
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70,039subscribers
+1,740 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001051601532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlackBlockMarkets |
| Description | BlackBlock Markets exists to observe how capital moves before it becomes obvious Manager: @BlackBlockMarketsAdmin |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlackBlockMarkets |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 22:58 | 70,039 | -571 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 12:09 | 70,610 | +1,390 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:18 | 69,220 | -1,200 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:35 | 70,420 | -361 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:49 | 70,781 | -656 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 71,437 | +1,282 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 70,155 | -123 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:19 | 70,278 | -684 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:28 | 70,962 | -978 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 71,940 | +759 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 71,181 | +862 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 70,319 | +775 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 69,544 | -824 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 70,368 | +1,027 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 69,341 | +2,941 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 66,400 | +715 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:27 | 65,685 | +814 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 64,871 | -1,260 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 66,131 | -1,724 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 67,855 | first reading |
Engagement
202 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.8%
- avg views ÷ 70,039 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,200
- 50 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 50
- of 202 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 202 (18 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 657,563 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 08:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 170
- Videos
- 123
- Links
- 17
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 32m 45s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.495%
- 1 of 202 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 23,100
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 2,950
- over 201 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
U.S. debt is set to rise by $2,400,000,000,000 in 2026 alone. That's more than Bitcoin's entire market cap. Printer is coming! @BlackBlockMarkets
WEALTH MANAGERS ADD BITCOIN EXPOSURE! $100B HighTower Advisors increases Bitcoin spot ETFs exposure by 50% in 3Q, reaches $155M. Also increased Saylor's Strategy stake to $9M @BlackBlockMarkets
Trump Media & Tech bought 6,172 Bitcoin in 3Q, now holds 15,649 BTC worth $1.17B • 100% pledged as collateral. • Counterpart can use the coins at their will. @BlackBlockMarkets
Altcoin trading volume has returned to normal levels. Through September, total altcoin volume spiked up to 4x Bitcoin's, marking a period of altcoin froth. As is often the case, this speculative alt activity coincided with the local market top, with $BTC peaking around 87k. @BlackBlockMarkets
JUST IN: $8 BILLION INVESTMENT ICON CATHIE WOOD SAYS #BITCOIN IS READY TO OUTPERFORM GOLD “GOLD IS LOSING MOMENTUM” “BTC AND GOLD HAVE HAD ALMOST ZERO CORRELATION SINCE 2019” “THE CORRELATION STANDS AT JUST 0.1” BITCOIN IS ABOUT TO STEAL GOLD’S SPOT. IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF TIME 🚀 @BlackBlockMarkets
💰💰 BlackRock transferred 5,320 $BTC ($396.49M) and 40.72K $ETH ($86.17M) to Coinbase Total moved: ~$482.66M. @BlackBlockMarkets
THE MANIPULATION IS OVER. YOU MADE IT THROUGH THE FEAR. YOU MADE IT THROUGH THE LIQUIDATIONS. YOU MADE IT THROUGH MONTHS OF PEOPLE CLAIMING THE CYCLE WAS DEAD. NOW IT’S TIME FOR WHAT YOU’VE BEEN WAITING FOR. BITCOIN IS SHIFTING INTO FULL BULLISH MODE. NEW ALL-TIME HIGHS. @BlackBlockMarkets
CHINA BUYS GOLD FOR 24 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS • China's central bank bought $3.3B in Oct. • 129 tonnes added in 2026 worth $16.6B Fiat debasement continues. @BlackBlockMarkets
BREAKING: The US Treasury will buy back up to $95 billion of its own debt over the next 3 months. This is fresh liquidity going back into the financial system, which is bullish for markets. @BlackBlockMarkets
$BTC Buy 500 days before the halving. Sell 500 days after the halving. That’s all there is to it. @BlackBlockMarkets
🚨 JUST IN: TOM LEE JUST SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT #BITCOIN IS ABOUT TO GO PARABOLIC AS DEMOCRATS ARE ALREADY TURNING PRO-CRYPTO! “THEY BLOCKED CRYPTO LEGISLATION RIGHT BEFORE THE MIDTERMS” “NOW THEY’RE ACTUALLY PUSHING TO GET IT PASSED” NOTHING CAN STOP THIS MOMENTUM. THE ROCKET IS READY TO LAUNCH 🚀 @BlackBlockMarkets
Showing the 12 most recent of 202 posts we hold for @BlackBlockMarkets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Altcoin_News_Today · 14,86618 postsGAMEFI Launches
@GameFiLaunches · 13,46713 postsCrypto Trading
@CryptoVTrading · 25,98412 postsCrypto Invest next 100x
@CryptoInvest100X · 28,1102 postsBitcoin Insights
@BitcoinInsightsDaily · 67,7351 postBitunix Trading Signals
@Bitunix_Trades · 68,1581 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ChartsSignalsTrading · 100,3161 postCrypto Invest next 100x
@CryptoInvest100X · 28,1101 postCrypto Pro Updates
@CryptoProUpdates · 33,9551 postOnly Finance
@OnlyFinance_Pro · 81,1061 postRainbet.com
@Rainbetcom · 75,5191 postElite Trade Signals – Crypto | Forex | Gold
@Signals2day · 18,0221 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BlackBlockMarkets named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 7 September 2026 – 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Black Block Markets” (@BlackBlockMarkets), 70,039 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackBlockMarkets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.