Channel
@BitcoinInsightsDaily
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54,781subscribers
+3,071 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001044917397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitcoinInsightsDaily |
| Description | Bitcoin is a global macro asset. This channel is dedicated to Bitcoin only. Structure. Liquidity. Macro. No noise. Admin: @JaleBTC @BitcoinInsightsDaily |
| Created | Between 1 February 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitcoinInsightsDaily |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 54,781 | -206 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 54,987 | -533 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 55,520 | +3,308 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 52,212 | -557 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 52,769 | +1,059 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 51,710 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 51,710 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (18 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,990 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🇺🇸 $14 TRILLION BLACKROCK CEO LARRY FINK SAID LIVE ON CNBC THAT BITCOIN BOTTOM IS IN AND IT'S ABOUT TO GO PARABOLIC NOW “BITCOIN’S LEVERAGE HAS WASHED OUT, AND STABILITY HAS IMPROVED” “I AM VERY BULLISH” @BitcoinInsightsDaily
BITCOIN IS GOING TO $400,000 The chart is speaking and most people aren't listening Buckle up @BitcoinInsightsDaily
Bitcoin network activity surged after the Coldcard firmware exploit, with active addresses rising to 0.98 million per day, the highest level since December 2024. 👉 This spike reflects fear-driven on-chain activity, as users moved funds and migrated wallets to improve security. The increase is an operational security response, not a sign of changing market sentiment or investor conviction. 🔒₿ @BitcoinInsightsDaily
THE MOMENT EVERYONE GAVE UP ON BITCOIN WAS THE BOTTOM. And it just printed at $60,000. Same thing happened in 2018. Same thing happened in 2022. Maximum fear. Maximum doubt. Maximum capitulation. Then the bear market ended. The people who bought when everyone was screaming doom… Were the ones who changed their lives. $60,000 was that moment. The bear market is over. The next chapter starts now. @BitcoinInsigh…
BITCOIN IS BOUNCING OFF TRENDLINE SUPPORT 🔥 LAST TIME THIS HAPPENED, BTC EXPLODED 800%. HISTORY IS REPEATING. VERY BULLISH 🚀 @BitcoinInsightsDaily
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump Media transfers 2,628 BTC to Crypto.com as estimated losses reach $555 million. @BitcoinInsightsDaily
Observation how Bitcoin formed bottom range 2018/2022/2026 @BitcoinInsightsDaily
💰 Bitcoin always closed August red in a Midterm year. Every time. August starts in 1 day. Prepare accordingly. @BitcoinInsightsDaily
Forget the classic Golden Cross. I built the True Bitcoin Golden Cross. Instead of using lagging moving averages, it tracks realized profit vs. realized losses. It called every Bitcoin bear market bottom with near-perfect accuracy. @BitcoinInsightsDaily
JUST IN: Spain's largest bank, Banco Santander, reports owning $4.3 million in spot #BTC @BitcoinInsightsDaily
THE REAL BULL RUN HAS OFFICIALLY STARTED. NO MORE PARTIES. NO MORE DISTRACTIONS. FOR THE NEXT 3–6 MONTHS, YOU NEED TO BE LOCKED IN. EVERY DECISION YOU MAKE FROM THIS POINT FORWARD MATTERS. YOU EITHER LOCK IN NOW… OR CLOCK IN FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. @BitcoinInsightsDaily
$BTC BOTTOM IS IN BIGGEST BULL RUN STARTS NOW @BitcoinInsightsDaily
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @BitcoinInsightsDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 628,338 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Insights” (@BitcoinInsightsDaily), 54,781 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinInsightsDaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.