15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -506. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 23,165โ23,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 02:13
23,241
-33
30 Aug 2026, 05:44
23,274
-72
29 Aug 2026, 08:36
23,346
-96
28 Aug 2026, 11:44
23,442
-12
27 Aug 2026, 13:11
23,454
-9
26 Aug 2026, 10:11
23,463
-19
25 Aug 2026, 07:54
23,482
-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:57
23,485
-14
22 Aug 2026, 15:25
23,499
+8
21 Aug 2026, 07:33
23,491
-5
20 Aug 2026, 10:36
23,496
-7
19 Aug 2026, 13:02
23,503
-35
18 Aug 2026, 13:58
23,538
-103
17 Aug 2026, 11:07
23,641
-106
16 Aug 2026, 03:30
23,747
first reading
Engagement
126 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
12.9%
avg views รท 23,241 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.275%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 126 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 114 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
126 (10 August 2026 โ 30 August 2026)
Views total
376,598
Reactions total
983
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
983 reactions across 113 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
336
34.2%
๐คก
157
16.0%
๐ฅ
134
13.6%
๐
128
13.0%
๐คฃ
78
7.93%
๐
48
4.88%
๐
21
2.14%
๐ฉ
9
0.916%
๐
9
0.916%
๐
9
0.916%
๐
8
0.814%
๐ฅฐ
8
0.814%
๐
5
0.509%
๐ฆ
5
0.509%
๐
4
0.407%
๐ค
4
0.407%
๐คช
4
0.407%
๐ญ
3
0.305%
๐ฏ
3
0.305%
๐
2
0.203%
6 further kinds
8
0.814%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 114 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 983reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BTC:
Nothing changed from last weeks Sunday report and my opinion remains unchanged.
We are perfectly moving in the described range and $82,000 was rejected few days ago. Any panic ? No way, I wasnโt expecting it to break out on the first try either
So relax and drink tea, 71-82k continues to be the range
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
Good morning
What are your thoughts on this Chinese Trader in Trading Arena ?
He called the short at 79,700 in public , and before he was long on BTC and SOL and closed with great profit
I think people should pay more attention to this Chinese, I like his posts
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
$BTC: Bears will become very loud in the next days, and bulls will feel the pressure and the market is designed to trap those late bulls and punish them for being late to the party. A manipulation to flush away the weak hands is very likely.
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
For all who havenโt understood yet:
BTC between 71-82k is sideway
It can take days or few weeks more
Result Iโm expecting is breakout
In the meantime: 71-82k sideway move
Very simple
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
Friends
I was away for some hours and when I returned I saw the chat thinking the world is crashing, when I checked the price itโs at $79,200
Wow, thatโs the moment I realized how many RETAILS (Peasants) have their entry at 79k area, and even worse, I think many of them are over leveraged
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
So in very SIMPLE words:
4-8h bearish divergences are VALID, and we should not ignore, but will their damage be massive? Not at all, this is only showing that RSI needs to correct while prices want to move higher, let it correct a bit before continue higher, and thats why I mentioned I see the floor MAX to 71k and again I would not bet on 71k! But to make it simple: Bitcoin remains extreme bullish and short term we โฆ
#BITCOIN:
Left Chart: Bearish Divergence on 4-8h
Result is: Short term pressure, VERY NORMAL
Right Chart: Bullish Divergence on Weekly
Result: Strong INCREASE, VERY NORMAL
@DoctorProfit_Crypto
๐6๐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @drprofitcryptosignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
๐งง Rose Premium Signal ๐น @RoseSignalsPremium ยท 97,888 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 16 August 2026
Binance Killersยฎ VIP Signals @BinanceKillersVipChannel ยท 47,979 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โDr. Profit Vip ๐โ (@drprofitcryptosignal), 23,241 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drprofitcryptosignal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.