Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭

Channel

Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭

@DoctorProfit_Crypto

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,546subscribers

-477 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036133746
TypeChannel
Username@DoctorProfit_Crypto
DescriptionElite trader - I trade psychology | #BTC |
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DoctorProfit_Crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 11 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7387 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC@drprofitcryptosignal/653111 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7393 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC@drprofitcryptosignal/653713 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7434 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC@drprofitcryptosignal/657819 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7515 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC@drprofitcryptosignal/66592 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7697 · this entry5 Oct 2026, 22:43 UTC@drprofitcryptosignal/68415 Oct 2026, 22:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@drprofitcryptosignal/68446 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC@DoctorProfit_Crypto/7700 · this entry6 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@drprofitcryptosignal155 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (155–0)
@drprofitsignal84 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minute@drprofitsignal (60–24)
@vipdrprofit72 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (62–10)
@drprofitfreebycf7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minutethis entry (7–0)
@doctorprofits_vip5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.982 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 65 of the 70 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 180 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 11 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @drprofitsignal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 11 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

21,54622,10621,8267 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net -477. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,462–22,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 02:0221,546-195
9 Nov 2026, 09:1821,741-111
8 Nov 2026, 00:5021,852-83
6 Nov 2026, 20:4621,935-19
5 Nov 2026, 23:1921,954-9
5 Nov 2026, 00:4621,963-5
3 Nov 2026, 23:5621,968-8
3 Nov 2026, 00:3621,976-14
2 Nov 2026, 02:5421,990-12
31 Oct 2026, 23:4422,002-6
30 Oct 2026, 20:5622,008-25
29 Oct 2026, 19:1822,033-5
28 Oct 2026, 20:3822,038-7
27 Oct 2026, 16:2222,045-11
26 Oct 2026, 17:4822,056-3
25 Oct 2026, 15:0622,059+6
24 Oct 2026, 17:0622,053-7
23 Oct 2026, 14:5422,060+15
22 Oct 2026, 15:4522,045+10
21 Oct 2026, 10:0922,035first reading

Engagement

370 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 21,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
66
of 370 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held370 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total158,530
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,530
Videos
≈37
Links
≈268

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 66 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 11 November 2026

$BTC: Buying more BTC with realized short profits on the above stocks right now at $73,700 @DoctorProfit_Crypto

11 Nov 2026, 00:07 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#COINBASE Taking full profit on the short from last year with an entry of $334. Its already down 60% since entry and a profit of 302% with a leverage of x5 The position is fully closed now @DoctorProfit_Crypto

11 Nov 2026, 00:03 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#NFLX: Considering the target as done, I am taking half of position size profit, the other half remains open. It has crashed 45% since short entry so far! @DoctorProfit_Crypto

10 Nov 2026, 23:57 UTC≈1,960 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#INTEL Three months ago, I placed several short orders on Intel at $119. Today, it’s trading at $58. I’m taking profits on 50% of the position and letting the remaining 50% run, with take-profit orders set between $35 and $40 @DoctorProfit_Crypto

10 Nov 2026, 21:39 UTC≈2,210 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$BTC: Every time Bitcoin hit the MA50 Weekly within a bull market, it marked the bottom for Bitcoin. The last time, it did not respect the support was during the Black Swan COVID event. And every time we broke below it within a bull market, it meant that the bear market started and it was always accurate. So now, this should have been the bottom, if not, it simply means Bitcoin was never in a bull market in the re…

9 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

You either buy early, or with the mass . Premium always on top of the food chain @DoctorProfit_Crypto

9 Nov 2026, 15:23 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$ONDO buy set up spot ONDO price is a gift right now, still higher than my entry in July, but with the current correction it reached the area where I planned to re-purchase in case market allows to visit. And in fact, ONDO is now in the exact area I was looking for to re-purchase! This will be my fifth largest bag after 1. ETH, 2. BTC, 3. CRCL, 4. COIN, 5. ONDO I am buying big amounts here. @DoctorProfit_Crypto

9 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,420 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

$ETH: Buying spot now at $2,120 @DoctorProfit_Crypto

9 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 11 November 2026

Portfolio allocation 70% BTC ETH CRCL COIN 20% FUTURES (Stocks/Crypto) 5% GOLD SILVER 5% CASH (Recurring) Anything of Cash higher than 5% I invest into BTC, ETH, CRCL, COIN, as today. @DoctorProfit_Crypto

Showing the 12 most recent of 370 posts we hold for @DoctorProfit_Crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,210 voters approx.

For the next 30 Days

  1. Bullish64%
  2. Bearish38%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 370 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 24,971
#1
Always Win Premium
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,264
#2
AltSignals VIP
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,742
#3
Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 20,428
#4
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,336
#5
Cash Haters 💰
@Cash_Haters · 7,207
#6
CRYPTO AMAN VIP
@aman_crypto_signals · 6,565
#7
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,738
#8
CryptoHolic©
@CryptoHolicss · 5,060
#9
Crypto King
@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis · 5,252
#10
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,453
#11
Rose 🌹
@rose · 84,971
#12
Inner Circle VIP FREE
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,524
#13
USA News
@USANewsTg · 8,193
#14
Crypto AMAN VIP Freemium
@cryptoamanvipfreemium · 3,823
#15
CCC.io Private Club VIP/Premium Free
@CryptoCoinsCoachCF · 4,559
#16
Klondike Premium Freemium
@klondike_freemium · 2,159
#17
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,187
#18
Crypto Swings Den of Honor Free
@DenofhonorbyCF · 2,306
#19
Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰
@DenmarkSnipers · 14,730
#20
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 321,132
#21
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,206
#22
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 94,769
#23
Top Crypto News
@TopCryptoNewsTg · 14,834
#24
Financial News
@FinancialNewsTg · 15,629
#25
Crypto Sharks®
@CryptoSharksTelegram · 16,192
#26
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,581
#27
#Bitcoin Radar
@Radar_Bitcoin · 7,349
#28
Wolfx Signals Vip
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,686
#29
Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹
@rosecryptochannelpremium · 14,093
#30
Rose Vip Signal | 1 BTC -> 100 BTC
@rosecryptochannelsignals · 9,422
#31
Bitcoin Magazine
@BitcoinMagazineTelegram · 9,790
#32
Rose Crypto Signals | Official Channel
@RoseSignals_Premium · 10,747
#33
the bitcoin diner
@thebitcoindiner · 14,803
#34
Bitcoin Assassins©
@BitcoinAssassins · 15,036
#35
Wolf of Trading® - ViP
@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP · 6,447
#36
Rose Crypto Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@cryptorosechannelll · 5,779
#37
Blue Bison Crypto®
@BlueBisonCrypto · 5,033
#38
Blockchain Clowns
@BlockchainClowns · 4,953
#39
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,613
#40
Token Hunters | TH
@TokenHunters_TH · 5,121
#41
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 25,035
#42
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,289
#43
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 115,653
#44
Crypto News
@CryptoNewsBroadcast · 2,478
#45
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 145,028
#46
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
#47
Bitcoin News
@BitcoinWorldwideNews · 3,009
#48
Crypto cove - By Banana Bot
@Crypto_Cove_Signals · 3,906
#49
Humans No Context
@outofcontexthumans · 1,855
#50
Donald Trump 🇺🇸
@realdonaldtrumpchannel · 2,291
#51
BRICS News
@BRICSNewspaper · 9,193
#52
World of Statistics
@worldofstatstg · 2,671
#53
CF Leverage Trading VIP Free
@TradingbyCFfreeCF · 971
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 24,971
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 20,428
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 September 2026
Doctor Profit Dr Profit
@drprofitsignal · 48,589
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 93,360
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,738
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,581
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 25,035
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Rose 🌹
@rose · 84,971
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ✅ ®
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 18,544
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 92,352
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,262
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Cryptocurrency - MurasX
@channelmurasx · 21,501
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
Binance signals
@binance_futures · 24,634
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
Waqar Zaka Group 📊
@waqarzaka_channel · 178,047
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
CrypNuevo updates 🔨
@CrypNuevoTA · 18,611
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 October 2026
BULLSTAR - SIGNALS
@BULLSTAR1 · 78,359
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 119,356
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭” (@DoctorProfit_Crypto), 21,546 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoctorProfit_Crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.